Insights into seasonal variation of litter decomposition and related soil degradative enzyme activities in subtropical forest in China

Abstract

We used a litterbag method to investigate litter decomposition and related soil degradative enzyme activities across four seasons in a broad-leaved forest and a coniferous forest on Zijin Mountain in sub-tropical China. Across four seasons, we quantified litter mass losses, soil pH values, and related soil degradative enzyme activities. Litter decomposition rates differed significantly by season. Litter decomposition rates of broadleaf forest leaves were higher than for coniferous forests needles across four seasons, and maximal differences in litter decomposition rates between the two litter types were found in spring. Obvious differences in litter decomposition rates of the two litter types were found in winter, which were similar to rates in spring. Litter decomposition rates of the two litter types in autumn were significantly higher than in spring. Soil degradative enzyme activities were lowest in winter and highest in summer in most cases across four seasons.

References

[1] Cornelissen JHC. An experimental comparison of leaf decomposition rates in a wide range of temperate plant species and types. Journal of Ecology, 1996, 84: 573-582.

[2] Daniel RM, Curran MP. A method for the determination of nitrate reductase. Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods, 1981, 4: 131-132.

[3] DeForest JL. The influence of time, storage temperature, and substrate age on potential soil enzyme activity in acidic forest soils using MUB-linked substrates and L-DOPA. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2009, 41: 1180-1186.

[4] Dick WA, Cheng L, Wang P. Soil acid and alkaline phosphatase activity as pH adjustment indicators. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2000, 32: 1915-1919.

[5] Elberling B. Annual soil CO₂ effluxes in the High Arctic: The role of snow thickness and vegetation type. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2007, 39: 646-654.

[6] Fioretto A, Papa S, Fuggi A. Litter-fall and litter decomposition in a low Mediterranean shrubland. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2003, 39: 37-44.

[7] Freppaz M, Williams BL, Edwards AC, Scalenghe R, Zanini E. Simulating soil freeze/thaw cycles typical of winter alpine conditions: Implications for N and P availability. Applied Soil Ecology, 2007, 35: 247-255.

[8] Ghose TK. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1987, 59: 257-268.

[9] Hobbie SE, Chapin FS. Winter regulation of tundra litter carbon and nitrogen dynamics. Biogeochemistry, 1996, 35: 327-338.

[10] Hobbie SE. Temperature and plant species control over litter decomposition in Alaskan Tundra. Ecological Monographs, 1996, 66: 503-522.

[11] Hoorens B, Aerts R, Stroetenga M. Does initial litter chemistry explain litter mixture effects on decomposition?. Oecologia, 2003, 137: 578-586.

[12] IPCC the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M. Climate Change. The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 45.

[13] Jenkinson DS, Adams DE, Wild A. Model estimates of CO₂ emissions from soil in response to global warming. Nature, 1991, 351: 304-306.

[14] Kalbitz K, Schmerwitz J, Schwesig D, Matzner E. Biodegradation of soil-derived dissolved organic matter as related to its properties. Geoderma, 2003, 113: 273-291.

[15] Kandeler E, Tscherko D, Spiegel H. Long-term monitoring of microbial biomass, N mineralisation and enzyme activities of a Chernozem under different tillage management. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1999, 28: 343-351.

[16] Kirschbaum MUF. The temperature dependence of organic-matter decomposition-still a topic of debate. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2006, 38: 2510-2518.

[17] Klopatek JM. Litter decomposition contrasts in second- and old-growth Douglas-fir forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA. Plant Ecology, 2008, 196: 123-133.

[18] Laiho R. Decomposition in peatlands: Reconciling seemingly contrasting results on the impacts of lowered water levels. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2006, 38: 2011-2024.

[19] Monson RK, Lipson DA, Burns SP, Turnipseed AA, Delany AC, Williams MW, Schmidt SK. Winter forest soil respiration controlled by climate and microbial community composition. Nature, 2006, 439: 711-714.

[20] Moorhead DL, Sinsabaugh RL. Simulated patterns of litter decay pre dict patterns of extracellular enzyme activities. Applied Soil Ecology, 2000, 14: 71-79.

[21] Nannipieri P, Ceccanti B, Cervelli S, Matarese E. Extraction of phosphatase, urease, proteases, organic-carbon, and nitrogen from Soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1980, 44: 1011-1016.

[22] Ohshima T, Tamura T, Sato M. Influence of pulsed electric field on various enzyme activities. Journal of Electrostatics, 2007, 65: 156-161.

[23] Olson JS. Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology, 1963, 44: 322-331.

[24] Palm CA, Sanchez PA. Nitrogen release from the leaves of some tropical legumes as affected by their lignin and polyphenolic contents. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 1991, 23: 83-88.

[25] Pascoal C, Cássio F. Contribution of fungi and bacteria to leaf litter decomposition in a polluted river. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2004, 70: 5266-5273.

[26] Perucci P, Casucci C, Dumontet S. An improved method to evaluate the o-diphenol oxidase activity of soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2000, 32: 1927-1933.

[27] Schimel JP, Weintraub MN. The implications of exoenzyme activity on microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: a theoretical model. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2003, 35: 549-563.

[28] Schmidt SK, Costello EK, Nemergut DR, Cleveland CC, Reed SC, Weintraub MN, Meyer AF, Martin AM. Biogeochemical consequences of rapid microbial turnover and seasonal succession in soil. Ecology, 2007, 88: 1379-1385.

[29] Schutter M, Dick R. Shifts in substrate utilization potential and structure of soil microbial communities in response to carbon substrates. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2001, 33: 1481-1491.

[30] Torres PA, Abril AB, Bucher EH. Microbial succession in litter decomposition in the semi-arid Chaco woodland. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2005, 37: 49-54.

[31] Trasar-Cepeda C, Camiña F, Leirós MC, Gil-Sotres F. An improved method to measure catalase activity in soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 1999, 31: 483-485.

[32] Trenberth KE. Conceptual framework for changes of extremes of the hydrological cycle with climate change. Climatic Change, 1999, 42: 327-339.

[33] Uchida M, Mo W, Nakatsubo T, Tsuchiya Y, Horikoshi T, Koizumi H. Microbial activity and litter decomposition under snow cover in a cool-temperate broad-leaved deciduous forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2005, 134: 102-109.

[34] Wang CY, Feng XG, Guo P, Han GM, Tian XJ. Response of degradative enzymes to N fertilization during litter decomposition in a subtropical forest through a microcosm experiment. Ecological Research, 2010, 25: 1121-1128.

[35] Wang CY, Guo P, Han GM, Feng XG, Zhang P, Tian XJ. Effect of simulated acid rain on the litter decomposition of Quercus acutissima and Pinus massoniana in forest soil microcosms and the relationship with soil enzyme activities. Science of the Total Environment, 2010, 408: 2706-2713.

[36] Wang CY, Han GM, Jia Y, Feng XG, Tian XJ. Insight into the temperature sensitivity of forest litter decomposition and soil enzymes in subtropical forest in China. Journal of Plant Ecology-UK, 2012, 5: 279-286.

[37] Yanai Y, Toyota K, Okazaki M. Effects of successive soil freeze-thaw cycles on soil microbial biomass and organic matter decomposition potential of soils. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2004, 50: 821-829.