Decay threshold of acetylated rattan (Calamus manan) against soft rot

Norul Hisham Hamid , Mike Hale

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2013, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2) : 375 -380.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2013, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2) : 375 -380. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-013-0362-9
Original Paper

Decay threshold of acetylated rattan (Calamus manan) against soft rot

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

We investigated the resistance of acetylated rattan against soft rot and other soil inhabiting micro-organisms in comparison with wood of beech and Scots pine. Calamus manan of 10 and 13 years old under rubber tree canopy was acetylated to different levels by reaction times (0.25 to 30 hours) and was tested for soft rot decay for 32 weeks. Acetylated rattan at decay protection thresholds of 15.4% and 16.2% weight gain (WG) were fully protected, as shown by both weight loss and strength loss criteria. The static bending properties of untreated rattan decayed by soft rot were significantly lower than for acetylated rattan.

Keywords

acetylation / cultivated rattan / soft rot / static bending properties

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Norul Hisham Hamid, Mike Hale. Decay threshold of acetylated rattan (Calamus manan) against soft rot. Journal of Forestry Research, 2013, 24(2): 375-380 DOI:10.1007/s11676-013-0362-9

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Anonymous. 1994. BS EN 350-1 Durability of wood and wood based products-natural durability of solid wood-Part 1: Guide to the principles of testing a classification of the natural durability of wood.

[2]

Anonymous. 1997. BS EN 84 Wood preservatives-accelerated ageing of treated wood prior to biological testing-leaching procedure.

[3]

Anonymous. 2001. DD ENV 807 Wood preservative-determination of the effectiveness against soft rotting micro-fungi and other soil inhabiting micro-organisms.

[4]

Beckers EPJ, Militz H, Stevens M. Resistance of acetylated wood to basidiomycetes, soft rot and blue stain. International Research Group on Wood Preservative, Helsingoer (Denmark), 11–16 Jun 1995, 1994

[5]

Beckers EPJ, Militz H, Stevens M. Acetylated solid wood laboratory durability test (Part II) and field trials. International Research Group on Wood Preservative, Helsingoer (Denmark), 11–16 Jun 1995, 1995

[6]

Bhat KM, Thulasidas PK, Mohamed CP. Strength properties of ten south Indian canes. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 1992, 5(1): 26-34.

[7]

Bowyer JL, Shmulsky R, Haygreen JG. Wood durability and protection. Forest Products and Wood Science: an introduction (Fourth edition), 2003 261 286

[8]

Brelid PL, Simonson R, Bergman O, Nilsson T. Resistance of acetylated wood to biological degradation. Holz als Roh-und Werkstoff, 2000, 58: 331-337.

[9]

Eaton RA, Hale MDC. Fungal decay. Wood: decay, pests and protection. 1993, London, New York: Chapman & Hall, 76 97

[10]

Hill CAS, Foster SC, Farahani MRM, Hale MDC, Ormondroyd GA, Williams GR. An investigation of cell wall micropore blocking as a possible mechanism for the decay resistance of anhydride modified wood. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2005, 55(1): 69-76.

[11]

Hill CAS, Jones D. Dimensional changes in Corsican pine sapwood due to chemical modification with linear chain anhydrides. Holzforschung, 1999, 53(3): 267-271.

[12]

Hill CAS, Ormondroyd GA. Dimensional changes in Corsican pine (Pinus nigra Arnold) modified with acetic anhydride measured using a helium phcnometer. Holzforschung, 2004, 58(5): 544-547.

[13]

Hill CAS. Wood Modification: chemical, thermal and other processes. 2006, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 233

[14]

Hon DNS. Chemical modification of lignocellulosic materials. 1996, New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., New York

[15]

Karim SR, Hill CAS, Ormondroyd GA. Dimensional stabilization of rubberwood (Hevea brasiliensis) with acetic or hexanoic anhydride. Journal of Tropical forest Science, 2006, 18(4): 261-268.

[16]

Kumar S. Chemical modification of wood. Wood and Fibre Science, 1994, 26(2): 270-280.

[17]

Liese W. Challenges and constraints in rattan processing and utilization in Asia. Unasylva, 2001, 205(52): 46-51.

[18]

Minato K, Takazawa R, Ogura K. Dependence of reaction kinetics and physical and mechanical properties on the reaction systems of acetylation II: physical and mechanical properties. Journal of Wood Science, 2003, 49(6): 519-524.

[19]

Mohebby B, Militz H. Soft rot decay in acetylated wood-chemical and anatomical changes in decayed wood, 2002

[20]

Peterson MD, Thomas RJ. Protection of wood from decay fungi by acetylation-an ultrastructural and chemical study. Wood and Fibre, 1978, 10(3): 149-163.

[21]

Rowell RM, Dawson BS, Hadi YS, Nicholas DD, Nilsson T, Plackett DV, Simonson R, Westin M. Worldwide in-ground stake test of acetylated composite boards, The International Research Group On Wood Preservative, Helsingoer (Denmark), 11–16 Jun 1995, 1997

[22]

Rowell RM. Hon D N S, Shiraishi N. Chemical modification of wood. Wood and cellulosic chemistry. 1991, New York: Marcel Dekker Inc, 703 756

[23]

Rowell RM. Acetylation of wood: Journey from analytical technique to commercial reality. Forest Products Journal, 2006, 56(9): 4-12.

[24]

Suttie ED, Hill CAS, Jones D, Orsler RJ. Chemically modified solid wood I. Resistance to fungal attack. Material und Organisme, 1998, 32(3): 159-182.

[25]

Zhou HM, Qian DZ, Wang AF. A study on the physical and mechanical properties of acetylated and untreated bamboo. Journal of Nanjing Institute of Forestry, 1985, 3: 13-34.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

134

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/