Spatial analysis and structure of a cross-timber stand in the TallGrass Prairie Preserve (Pawhuska, Oklahoma)

Abstract

I analyzed the spatial distribution and structure of trees in a cross timber forest in the Tallgrass Prairie Preserve (Pawhuska, Oklahoma, USA). I mapped and measured diameter of all stems, saplings (>1.5 m tall) and dead trees in a 4-ha plot. The stand was dominated by Quercus stellata and Q. marilandica. In total, I mapped 7,636 trees, consisting of 6,785 Q. stellata, 846 Q. marilandica, 2 Celtis occidentalis, 1 Fraxinus pensilvanica and 2 Prunus americana. For saplings, I mapped 54 Q. stellata and 21 Q. marilandica. The size class distribution of the two dominant species did not differ. The dominant mortality class was “standing dead”, while I only found saplings less than 2 m tall. The spatial distribution of the species indicated segregation in the use of the environment, generating a clumped univariate distribution of stems of the same species within radii of 30 m, but repulsion outside 30 m. This segregation can be explained by the different ecological requirements of each species.

Keywords

conservation / point pattern analysis / Quercus stellata / Q. marilandica / size class distribution

References

[1] Anon. 1986. SPSS/PC+ V.6.0. Base manual. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.

[2] Alekseev A.S., Zherebtsov R.R.. Regularities of spatial distribution of damaged vegetation under conditions of regional and local air pollution (with reference to the impact zone around the Pechenganikel mining and smelting plant). Russian Journal of Ecology, 1995, 26: 428-435.

[3] Allen M.S., Palmer M.W.. Fire history of a prairie/forest boundary: more than 250 years of frequent fire in a North American Tallgrass prairie. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2011, 22: 436-444.

[4] Arévalo J.R.. The distribution of trees and saplings at the edge of cross timbers forests, Oklahoma, USA. Natural Areas Journal, 2002, 22: 99-107.

[5] Arévalo J.R., Álvarez P., Narvaez N., Walker K.. The effects of fire on the regeneration of a Quercus douglasii stand in Quail Ridge Reserve, Berryessa Valley (California). Journal of Forest Research, 2009, 14: 81-87.

[6] Bazzaz F.A.. Grace J.B., Tilman D.. Plant-Plant interactions in successional environments. Perspectives in plant competition. 1990, London: Academic Press, 240 263

[7] Becker P., Rabenold P.E., Idol J.R., Smith A.P.. Water potenti gradients for gaps and slopes in a Panamanian tropical moist forest’s dry season. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 1988, 4: 173-184.

[8] Borchert M.I., Davis F.W., Michaelsen J., Oyler L.D.. Interactions of factors affecting seedling recruitment of blue oak (Quercus douglasii) in California. Ecology, 1989, 70: 389-404.

[9] Bruner W.E.. The vegetation of Oklahoma. Ecological Monographs, 1931, 1: 99-188.

[10] Busing R.T.. Estimation of tree replacement in an Appalachian Picea-Abies forest. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1996, 7: 685-694.

[11] Clark D.B., Clark D.A., Read J.M.. Edaphic variation and the mesoscale distribution of tree species in a neotropical rain forest. Journal of Ecology, 1998, 86: 101-102.

[12] Clark S., Hallgren S.W.. Dynamics of oak (Quercus marilandica and Quercus stellata) reproduction in an old-growth cross timbers forest. Southeastern Naturalist, 2003, 2: 559-574.

[13] Collins S.L., Klhar S.C.. Tree dispersion in oak-dominated forest along an environmental gradient. Oecologia, 1991, 86: 471-477.

[14] Condit R., Hubbell S.P., Foster R.B.. Recruitment near conspecific adults and the maintenance of tree and shrub diversity in a neotropical forest. American Naturalist, 1992, 140: 261-286.

[15] Connell J.H.. Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past. Oikos, 1980, 35: 131-138.

[16] Duncan R.D.. Competition and the coexistence of species in a mixed podocarp stand. Journal of Ecology, 1991, 79: 1073-1084.

[17] Dyksterhuis E.J.. The vegetation of the western cross timbers. Ecological Monographs, 1948, 18: 325-376.

[18] Francaviglia R.V.. The cast iron forest: a natural and cultural history of the North American cross timbers. 2000, San Antonio: University of Texas, 276.

[19] Hamilton R.G.. Using fire and bison to restore a functional tallgrass prairie landscape. Transactions of the 61st North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference. 1996, Washington, D.C.: Wildlife Management Institute, 208 214

[20] Hatton T.J.. Spatial patterning of sweet briar (Rosa rubignosa) by vertebrate species. Australian. Journal of Ecology, 1989, 14: 199-205.

[21] He F., Legendre P., LaFrankie J.V.. Distribution patterns of tree species in a Malaysian tropical rain forest. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1997, 8: 105-114.

[22] Hoagland B.W., Butler I.H., Johnson F.L., Glenn S.. Anderson R.C., Fralish J.S., Baskin J.M.. The cross timbers. Savannas, Barrens, and Rock Outcrop Plant Communities of North America. 1999, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 231 245

[23] Horn H.S.. Cody M.L., Diamond J.M.. Markovian processes of forest succession. Ecology and Evolution of communities. 1975, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press, 196 211

[24] Johnson F.L., Risser P.G.. Some vegetation-environment relationships in the upland forests of Oklahoma. Journal of Ecology, 1972, 60: 655-663.

[25] Kroh G.C., Nisbet J.. Some structural aspects of a western cross timbers forest in north central Texas. Texas Journal of Science, 1983, 35: 41-45.

[26] Little E.L.. The vegetation of Muskogee County, Oklahoma. American Midland Naturalist, 1938, 19: 559-572.

[27] Matlack G.R.. Microenvironment variation within and among deciduous forest edge sites in the eastern United States. Biological Conservation, 1993, 66: 185-194.

[28] Mensing S.A.. The impact of European settlement on blue oak (Quercus douglasii) regeneration and recruitment in the Tehachapi mountains, California. Madroño, 1992, 39: 36-46.

[29] Miller H.A., Lamb S.H.. Oaks of North America. 1984, Happy Camp, California: Naturegraph Publishers, Inc., 560.

[30] Moeur M.. Characterizing spatial patterns of trees using stem-mapped data. Forest Science, 1993, 39: 756-775.

[31] Norton D.A.. Seedling and sapling distribution patterns in a coastal podocarp ofrest, Hokitika Ecological District, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 1991, 29: 563-466.

[32] Oliver C.D., Larson B.C.. Forest Stand Dynamics. 1990, New York: McGraw-Hill, 467.

[33] Penfound W.T.. The savvana concept in Oklahoma. Ecology, 1962, 43: 774-775.

[34] Rice E.L., Penfound W.T.. The upland forest of Oklahoma. Ecology, 1959, 40: 593-608.

[35] Rice E.L.. Bottomland forests of Oklahoma. Ecology, 1965, 46: 708-714.

[36] Ripley B.D.. Modelling spatial patterns. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 1977, 39(2): 172-212.

[37] Risser P.G., Rice E.L.. Diversity in tree species in Oklahoma upland forest. Ecology, 1971, 52: 876-880.

[38] Russell M., Honkala B.H.. Silvics of North America: 2 Hardwoods. 1990, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service. Agric. Handbook, 654.

[39] Silvertown J.W.. Introduction to plant population ecology. 1982, London: Longman, 209.

[40] Smeins F.. Shiftlet T.N.. Cross timbers -Texas-Little bluestem-post oak-SRM 732. Rangeland cover types of the United States. 1994, Denver. Colorado: Society of Range Management, 107 108

[41] Stoyan D., Stoyan H.. Fractals, random shapes and point fields. Methods of geometrical statistics. 1994, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 406.

[42] Swiecki TJ, Bernhardt E. 1993. Factors affecting blue oak sapling recruitment and regeneration. Prepared for Strategic Planning Program. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, p. 132.

[43] Szwagrzk J.. Small scale spatial patterns of trees in a mixed Pinus sylvestris-Fagus sylvatica forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 1992, 51: 469-476.

[44] Tarr J., Botkin G., Rice E.L., Carpenter E., Hart M.. Abroad analysis of fifteen sites in the tall-grass prairieof Oklahoma. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science, 1980, 60: 39-42.

[45] Therrell M.D., Stahle D.W.. A predictive model to locate ancient forests in the cross timber of Osage county, Oklahoma. Journal of Biogeography, 1998, 25: 847-854.

[46] Vacek S., Lepš J.. Spatial dynamics of forest decline: the role of neighbouring trees. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1996, 7: 789-798.

[47] Wethington M.K.. A spatial and temporal analysis of forest and grassland changes at the Tallgrass Prairie Preserve. 1994, Stillwater: Oklahoma State University.

[48] Weigand T., Moloney K.A.. Rings, circles and null-models for point pattern analysis in ecology. Oikos, 2004, 104: 209-229.

[49] Woods K.D.. Reciprocal replacement and the maintenance of codominance in a beech-maple forest. Oikos, 1979, 33: 31-39.

[50] Zar J.H.. Biostatistical analysis, 1984 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 718.