Discrepancy in fine root turnover estimates between diameter-based and branch-order-based approaches: a case study in two temperate tree species

Abstract

Fine root turnover plays a key role in carbon (C) budgets and nutrients cycles in forest ecosystems. However, the difference between branch-order-based and diameter-based approaches in estimating fine root turnover is still unclear. We studied root biomass turnover based on multiplying root standing biomass by turnover rate (inverse of median root longevity) in two Chinese temperate tree species, Fraxinus mandshurica Rupr. and Larix gmelinii Rupr. The minirhizotron (MR) technique was used to estimate longevities for first and second order roots, and total roots (R _total) apparent on the MR tube surface. The corresponding biomass for each root group was estimated by soil monolith. The difference in biomass turnover between R _total and the sum of the first and second order roots was used to represent the discrepancy between diameter- and order-based approaches. First order roots had shorter life spans and higher biomass turnover rates than the second order roots in both species. Biomass turnover estimated by the order-based method for F. mandshurica and L. gmelinii were 155.4 g·m⁻²·a⁻¹ and 158.9 g·m⁻²·a⁻¹, respectively, in comparison with 99.5 g·m⁻²·a⁻¹ and 117.7 g·m⁻²·a⁻¹ estimated by the diameter-based method, indicating that the diameter-based approach underestimated biomass turnover. The most probable reason was that the order-based method enhanced separation of the heterogeneous root population into relatively homogenous root groups with varying turnover rates. We conclude that separating fine root pool into different branch orders can improve the accuracy of estimates for fine root turnover, as well as the understanding of the belowground C allocation and nutrient cycling at ecosystem level.

Keywords

Fraxinus mandshurica / root life span / root longevity / Larix gmelinii / minirhizotron / soil monolith

References

[1] Andersson P., Majdi H.. Estimating root longevity at sites with long periods of low root mortality. Plant and Soil, 2005, 276: 9-14.

[2] Baddeley J.A., Watson C.A.. Influences of root diameter, tree age, soil depth and season on fine root survivorship in Prunus avium. Plant and Soil, 2005, 276: 15-22.

[3] Burton A.J., Pregitzer K.S., Hendrick R.L.. Relationships between fine root dynamics and nitrogen availability in Michigan northern hardwood forests. Oecologia, 2000, 125: 389-399.

[4] Cheng Y.H., Han Y.Z., W Q.C., Wang Z.Q.. Seasonal dynamics of fine root biomass, root length density, specific root length and soil resource availability in a Larix gmelinii plantation. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2005, 29: 403-410.

[5] Eissenstat D.M., Yanai R.D.. Waisel Y., Eshel A., Kafkafi U.. Root life span, efficiency, and turnover. Plant roots, the hidden half, 2002 3rd Edn. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc, 221 238

[6] Espeleta J.F., West J.B., Donovan L.A.. Tree species fine-root demography parallels habitat specialization across a sandhill soil resource gradient. Ecology, 2009, 90: 1773-1787.

[7] Gong Z.T., Chen Z.C., Luo G.B., Zhang G.L., Zhao W.J.. Soil reference with Chinese soil taxonomy. Soils, 1999, 31: 57-63.

[8] Guo D.L., Mitchell R.J., Hendricks J.J.. Fine root branch orders respond differentially to carbon source-sink manipulations in a longleaf pine forest. Oecologia, 2004, 140: 450-457.

[9] Guo D.L., Li H., Mitchell R.J., Han W.X., Hendricks J.J., Fahey T.J., Hendrick R.L.. Fine root heterogeneity by branch order: exploring the discrepancy in root turnover estimates between minirhizotron and carbon isotopic methods. New Phytologist, 2008, 177: 443-456.

[10] Guo D.L., Mitchell R.J., Withington J.M., Fan P.P., Hendricks J.J.. Endogenous and exogenous controls of root life span, mortality and nitrogen flux in a longleaf pine forest: root branch order predominates. Journal of Ecology, 2008, 96: 737-745.

[11] Guo D.L., Xia M.X., Wei X., Liu Y., Wang Z.Q.. Anatomical traits associated with absorption and mycorrhizal colonization are linked to root branch order in twenty-three Chinese temperate tree species. New Phytologist, 2008, 180: 673-683.

[12] Hendrick R.L., Pregitzer K.S.. The dynamics of fine root length, biomass, and nitrogen content in two northern hardwood ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1993, 23: 2507-2520.

[13] Hendricks J.J., Hendrick R.L., Wilson C.A., Mitchell R.J., Pecot S.D., Guo D.L.. Assessing the patterns and controls of fine root dynamics: an empirical test and methodological review. Journal of Ecology., 2006, 94: 40-57.

[14] Iverson C.M., Ledford J., Norby R.J.. CO₂ enrichment increases carbon and nitrogen input from fine roots in a deciduous forest. New Phytologist, 2008, 179: 837-847.

[15] Jackson R.B., Mooney H.A., Schulze E.D.. A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 1997, 94: 7362-7366.

[16] Johnson M.G., Tingey D.T., Phillips D.L., Storm M.J.. Advancing fine root research with minirhizotrons. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2001, 45: 263-289.

[17] Joslin J.D., Gaudinski J.B., Torn M.S.. Fine-root turnover patterns and their relationship to root diameter and soil depth in a ¹⁴C-labeled hardwood forest. New Phytologist, 2006, 172: 523-535.

[18] King J.S., Albaugh T.J., Allen H.L.. Below-ground carbon input to soil is controlled by nutrient availability and fine root dynamics in loblolly pine. New Phytologist, 2002, 154: 389-398.

[19] Lee E.T., Wang J.W.. Statistical methods for survival data analysis, 2003 3rd Edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 64 77

[20] Majdi H., Damm E., Nylund J.E.. Longevity of mycorrhizal roots depends on branching order and nutrient availability. New Phytologist, 2001, 150: 195-202.

[21] Majdi H., Pregitzer K.S., Morén A.S., Nylund J.E., Ågren G.I.. Fine root turnover in forest ecosystems. Plant and Soil, 2005, 276: 1-8.

[22] Mei L.. Fine root turnover and carbon allocation in manchurian ash and davurian larch plantations. 2006, China: Northeast Forestry Universiy

[23] Norby R.J., Jackson R.B.. Root dynamics and global change: seeking an ecosystem perspective. New Phytologist, 2000, 147: 3-12.

[24] Peek S.M.. Esser K., Löttge U., Beyschlag W.. Explaining variations in fine root lifespan. Progress in Botany. 2007, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 382 398

[25] Pregitzer K.S., Kubiske M.E., Yu C.K.. Relationships among root branch order, carbon, and nitrogen in four temperate species. Oecologia, 1997, 111: 302-308.

[26] Pregitzer K.S., Laskowski M.J., Burton A.J.. Variation in sugar maple root respiration with root diameter and soil depth. Tree Physiology, 1998, 18: 665-670.

[27] Pregitzer K.S., DeForest J.A., Burton A.J., Allen M.F., Ruess R.W., Hendrick R.L.. Fine root architecture of nine North American trees. Ecological Monographs, 2002, 72: 293-309.

[28] Shi J.W., Wang Z.Q., Yu S.Q., Quan X.K., Sun Y., Jia S.X., Mei L.. Estimating fine root production, mortality and turnover with minirhizotron in Larix gmelinii and Fraxinus mandshurica plantations. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 31: 333-342.

[29] Steele S.J., Gower S.T., Vogel J.G., Norman J.M.. Root mass, met primary production and turnover in aspen, jack pine and black spruce forests in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada. Tree Physiology, 1997, 7: 577-587.

[30] Steinaker D.F., Scott D.W.. Belowground litter contributions to nitrogen cycling at a northern grassland-forest boundary. Ecology, 2005, 86: 2825-2833.

[31] Tierney G.L., Fahey T.J., Groffman P.M.. Environmental control of fine root dynamics in a northern hardwood forest. Global Change Biology, 2003, 9: 670-679.

[32] Trumbore S.E., Gaudinski J.B.. The secret live of roots. Science, 2003, 302: 1344-1345.

[33] Valenzuela-Estrada L.R., Vera-Caraballo V., Ruth L.E., Eissenstat D.M.. Root anatomy, morphology, and longevity among root orders in Vaccinium corymbosum (Ericaceae). American Journal of Botany, 2008, 95: 1506-1514.

[34] Vogt K.A., Vogt D.J., Bloomfield J.. Comparison of direct and indirect methods for studying root dynamics of forests. Plant and Soil, 1998, 200: 71-89.

[35] Wang Z.Q., Guo D.L., Wang X.R., Gu J.C., Mei L.. Fine root architecture, morphology, and biomass of different branch orders of two Chinese temperate tree species. Plant and Soil, 2006, 288: 151-171.

[36] Wells C.E., Eissenstat D.M.. Marked differences in survivorship among apple roots of different diameters. Ecology, 2001, 82: 882-889.

[37] Wells C.E., Eissenstat D.M.. Beyond the roots of young seedlings: the influence of age and order on fine root physiology. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2003, 21: 324-334.

[38] Wells C.E., Glenn D.M., Eissenstat D.M.. Changes in the risk of fine-root mortality with age: a case study in peach, Prunus Persica (Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany, 2002, 89: 79-87.

[39] Withington J.M., Reich P.B., Oleksyn J., Eissenstat D.M.. Comparisons of structure and life span in roots and leaves among temperate trees. Ecological Monographs, 2006, 76: 381-397.

[40] Yu S.Q., Wang Z.Q., Shi J.W., Quan X.K., Mei L., Jia S.X., Yu L.Z.. Estimating fine-root longevity of Fraxinus mandshurica and Larix gmelinii using mini-rhizotrons. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 31: 102-109.

[41] Zhou X.F.. Long-term research on China’s forest ecosystems. 1994, Harbin: Northeast Forestry University Press, 213 221