Site index for teak in Colombia

Abstract

Determination of site quality is a basic tool for proper selection of locations and species, in management of forest plantations. Throughout the Caribbean studies of site quality are few and are hampered by statistical limitations, inappropriate growth models, and limited data. We fitted growth curves for dominant height to evaluate and classify site quality of teak (Tectona grandis) plantations by using data from 44 permanent sample plots established since 1990 in 3–22 years old teak plantations in the Colombian Caribbean region. We used Korf’s and von Bertalanffy’s models to fit curves as non-linear effects models. Both models, with a single random parameter, were considered as adequate for dominant height growth modelling, but Korf’s model was superior. The resulting curves were anamorphic and closely reflected high variability in site quality. Five site classes were clarified: at a base age of 12 years old, teak reached a mean dominant height of 24.8 m on the best sites, 9.8 m in the worst sites, and in the averages sites, 15.8–18.8 m. Using this model, we identified the best and the worst sites for teak plantations in the Caribbean region. This model proved a useful tool, not only for site quality evaluation, but also for improved teak plantation planning and management.

Keywords

Tectona grandis / site index / growth modelling / permanent sample plots / Colombia

References

[1] Bailey R.L., Clutter J.L.. Base-age invariant polymorphic site curves. Forest Science, 1974, 20(2): 155-159.

[2] Bermejo I., Caňellas I., Miguel A.S.. Growth and yield models for teak plantations in Costa Rica. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004, 189: 97-110.

[3] Carmean W.H.. Site index comparisons among northern hardwoods in northern Wisconsin and Upper Michigan. 1979, St. Paul, MN: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station

[4] Chaves E.S., Fonseca W.G.. Ensayos de aclareo y crecimiento en plantaciones de teca (Tectona grandis L.f.) en la Península de Nicoya, Costa Rica. Instituto de Investigación y Servicios Forestales (INISEFOR). 2003, Heredia, Costa Rica: Universidad Nacional

[5] Cieszewski C.J., Bella I.E.. Polymorphic height and site index curves for lodge pole pine in Alberta. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1989, 19(9): 1151-1160.

[6] Cieszewski C.J., Bailey R.L.. Generalized algebraic difference approach: Theory based derivation of dynamic site equations with polymorphism and variable asymptotes. Forest Science, 2000, 46(1): 116-126.

[7] Clutter J.L., Fortson J.C., Pienaar L.V., Brister G.H., Bailey R.L.. Timber Management: A Quantitative Approach. 1983, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 333.

[8] Curtis R.O., DeMars D.J., Herman F.R.. Which dependent variable in site index-height-age regression?. Forest Science, 1974, 20(1): 74-87.

[9] Echeverri R.R.. Bases para la formulación de proyectos de reforestación con teca (Tectona grandis Lin. F.) en Colombia. Trabajo de Grado, Ingeniería Forestal). 1968, Medellín: Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede, 50.

[10] Fang Z., Bailey R.L.. Nonlinear mixed effects modelling for slash pine dominant height growth following intensive silvicultural treatments. Forest Science, 2001, 47(3): 287-300.

[11] Fang Z., Bailey R.L., Shiver B.D.. A multivariate simultaneous prediction system for stand growth and yield with fixed and random effects. Forest Science, 2001, 47(4): 550-562.

[12] Gregoire T.G.. Generalized error structure for forestry yield models. Forest Science, 1987, 33(2): 423-444.

[13] Henao I.D.. Estudio de rendimientos y rentabilidad en una plantación de teca (Tectona grandis L.F.) del departamento de Córdoba, Colombia. Crónica Forestal y del Medio Ambiente, 1982, 2(1/2): 1-75.

[14] Holdridge L.R.. Ecología basada en zonas de vida. 1982, San José, Costa Rica: Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura, 216.

[15] IGAC, Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi. 1978. Atlas regional del Caribe. Bogotá, Colombia. p.120.

[16] IGAC, Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi (1989) Atlas básico de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.720 pp.

[17] Jerez-Rico M., Moret-Barillas A.Y., Carrero-Gámez A.E., Machiavelli R.E., Quevedo-Rojas A.M.. Curvas de índice de sitio basadas en modelos mixtos para plantaciones de teca (Tectona grandis L.F.) en los llanos de Venezuela: site index curves based on mixed models for teak (Tectona grandis L.F.) plantations in the Venezulan plains. Agrociencia, 2011, 45: 135-145.

[18] Keogh R.M.. Whitmore J.L.. Teca (Tectona grandis). Procedencias del Caribe: América Central, Venezuela y Colombia. Producción de Madera en los Neotrópicos via Plantaciones, Proc. IUFRO/MAB/U.S. Forest Service Symposium, IUFRO Working Group SI-07-09, Sept. 1980. 1981, Puerto Rico: Inst. Trop For Río Piedras, 356 372

[19] Keogh R.M.. Teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.), provisional site classification chart for the Caribbean, Central America, Venezuela and Colombia. Forest Ecology and Management, 1982, 4(2): 143-153.

[20] Kiviste A., Álvarez J.G., Rojo A., Ruíz A.D.. Funciones de crecimiento de aplicación en el ámbito forestal. 2002, Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria, 190.

[21] Lowe R.G.. Teak (Tectona grandis Linn. F.) thinning experiment in Nigeria. Commonwealth Forestry Review, 1976, 55(165): 189-202.

[22] Malende Y.H., Temu A.B.. Site-index curves and volume growth of teak (Tectona grandis) at Mtibwa, Tanzania. Forest Ecology and Management, 1990, 31(1/2): 91-99.

[23] Miller AD. 1969. Provisional yield tables for teak in Trinidad, Trinidad and Tobago, Government Printery, Port of Spain. p. 20.

[24] Mora FA, Meza V. 2004. Comparación del crecimiento en altura de la Teca (Tectona grandis) en Costa Rica con otros trabajos previos y con otras regiones del mundo, Universidad Nacional, Heredia, Costa Rica. Available at: www.una.ac.cr/inis/discusión. [Accessed on 15 September, 2010].

[25] Nunifu T.K., Murchinson H.G.. Provisional yield models of teak (Tectona grandis Linn. F.) plantations in northern Ghana. Forest Ecology and Management, 1999, 120(1–3): 171-178.

[26] Pérez D., Kanninen M.. Stand growth scenarios for Tectona grandis plantations in Costa Rica. Forest Ecology and Management, 2005, 210(1–3): 425-441.

[27] Rodríguez R. 1968. Estudio alternativo de zonas aptas para teca. (Trabajo de Grado Ingeniería Forestal). Universidad Nacional de Colombia sede Medellín. p. 55.

[28] SAS. Online Doc version eight. 1999, Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.

[29] Schumacher F.X.. A new growth curve and its application to timber in yield studies. Journal of Forestry, 1939, 37: 819-820.

[30] Upadhyay A., Eid T., Sanlhayan P.L.. Construction of site index equations for even aged stands of Tectona grandis (teak) from permanent plots data in India. Forest Ecology and Management, 2005, 212: 14-22.

[31] Vaides E., Ugalde L., Galloway G.. Crecimiento y productividad de teca en plantaciones forestales jóvenes en Guatemala. Recursos Naturales y Ambiente, 2004, 46–47: 137-145.

[32] Vincent L.W., Moret A.Y., Jerez M.. Comparación de algunos regímenes de espesura en plantaciones de teca en el área experimental de la Reserva Forestal de Caparo, Venezuela. Rev Forest Venez, 2000, 44(2): 87-95.