The inventory of the carbon stocks in sub tropical forests of Pakistan for reporting under Kyoto Protocol

Abstract

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) requires reporting net carbon stock changes and anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, including those related to forests. This paper describes the status of carbon stocks in sub tropical forests of Pakistan. There are two major sub types in subtropical forests of Pakistan viz a viz Subtropical Chir Pine and Subtropical broadleaved forests. A network of sample plots was laid out in four selected site. Two sites were selected from sub tropical Chir Pine (Pinus roxburghii) forests and two from Subtropical broadleaved forests. Measurement and data acquisition protocols were developed specifically for the inventory carried out from 2005 to 2010. In total 261 plots (each of 1ha.) were established. Estimation of diameter, basal area, height, volume and biomass was carried out to estimate carbon stocks in each of the four carbon pools of above- and below-ground live biomass. Soil carbon stocks were also determined by doing soil sampling. In mature (∼100 years old) pine forest stand at Ghoragali and Lehterar sites, a mean basal area of 30.38 and 26.11 m²·ha⁻¹ represented mean volume of 243 and 197 m³·ha⁻¹, respectively. The average biomass (t·ha⁻¹) was 237 in Ghoragali site and 186 t·ha⁻¹in Lehterar site, which is equal to 128 and 100 t C ha⁻¹ including soil C. However, on average basis both the forests have 114.5± 2.26 t·ha⁻¹ of carbon stock which comprises of 92% in tree biomass and only 8% in the top soils. In mixed broadleaved evergreen forests a mean basal area (m²·ha⁻¹) was 3.06 at Kherimurat with stem volume of 12.86 and 2.65 at Sohawa with stem volume of 11.40 m³·ha⁻¹. The average upper and under storey biomass (t·ha⁻¹) was 50.93 in Kherimurat site and 40.43 t·ha⁻¹in Sohawa site, which is equal to 31.18 and 24.36 t C ha⁻¹ including soil C stocks. This study provides a protocol and valuable baseline data for monitoring biomass and carbon stocks in Pakistan’s managed and unmanaged sub-tropical forests.

Keywords

carbon stock models / managed and unmanaged subtropical forests / above and below ground biomass / forest inventory and volume

References

[1] Anderson J.M., Ingram J.S.I.. Tropical Soil Fertility: A handbook of methods. 1993, Wallingford. U.K: CAB, 68 71

[2] Bakker J.P., Olff H., Willems J.H., Zobel M.. Why do we need permanent plots in the study of long-term vegetation dynamics?. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1996, 7: 147-156.

[3] Bell G.. Environmental heterogeneity and species diversity of forest edges. Journal of Ecology, 2000, 88: 67-87.

[4] Birkeland P.W.. Soils and Geomorphology. 1984, New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 372.

[5] Brown S., Lugo A.E.. The storage and production of organic matter in tropical forests and their role in the global carbon cycle. Biotropica, 1982, 14: 161-187.

[6] Cairns M.A., Brown S., Helmer E.H., Baumgardner G.A.. Root biomass allocation in the world upland forest. Oecologia, 1997, 111: 1-11.

[7] Chaturvedi O.P., Singh J.S.. Total biomass and biomass production in Pinus roxburghii trees growing in all aged natural forests. Can J For Res, 1982, 12: 632-640.

[8] Dixon R.K., Brown S., Houghton R.A., Solomon A.M., Trexler M.C., Wisniewski J.. Carbon pool and fluxes of global forest ecosystem. Science, 1994, 263: 185-190.

[9] FAO. 2006. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005 — Progress towards Sustainable Forest Management. FAO Forestry Paper No. 147.

[10] Herzog M.. Shrubland Management in Tribal Islamic Yemen. Social Forestry as Development of a Local and Sustainable (Sylvi) Culture-An Essay in Practical Philosophy. 1998, Switzerland: Rheinfelden

[11] Holmgren A.H., Holmgren N.H.. Cronquist A., Holmgren A.H., Holmgren N.H., Reveal J.L., Holmgren P.K.. Poaceae. Intermountain Flora. 1977, New York: Columbia Univ. Press

[12] Hubbell S.P.. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. 2001, Princeton, U.S.: Princeton University Press, 448.

[13] Hussain F, Ellahi I. 1991. Ecology and vegetation of lesser Himalayan Pakistan. Bot. dept. Uni.of. Peshawar, p. 187.

[14] Hussain S.S.. Pakistan Manual of Plant Ecology. 1984, Islamabad: National Book Foundation, Vi+ 255.

[15] IPCC. 2003. Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Japan.

[16] Lieth H.. Lieth H., Whittaker R. H.. Primary production of the major vegetation units of the world. Primary productivity of the biosphere. 1975, New York: Springer-Verlag, 203 215

[17] Malhi Y., Baker T.R., Phillips O.L., Almeida S., Alvarez E., Arroyo L., Chave J., CzimczikI C.I., Fiore A.D., Higuchi N., Killeen T.J., Laurance S.G., Laurance W.F., Lewis S.L., Montoya L.M.M., Lloyd J.. The above-groundcoarse wood productivity of 104 Neotropical forest plots. Glob Change Biol, 2004, 10: 563-591.

[18] Naqvi H.H.. Vegetation zonation of Murree Hazara Hills. 1997, Islamabad. Pakistan: University Grant Commission Project.

[19] Oliver G.R., Pearce S.H., Graham J.D., Beets P.N.. Carbon in Plantation Understorey Shrubs. 2009, Wellington: Ministry for the Environment

[20] Payton I.J., Newell C.L., Beets P.N.. New Zealand Carbon Monitoring System Indigenous Forest and Shrubland Data Collection Manual. 2004, Christchurch: The Caxton Press

[21] Payton IJ, Moore JR, Burrows LE, Goulding CJ, Beets PN, Dean M, Herries DL. 2008. New Zealand Carbon Monitoring System Planted Forest Data Collection Manual. Version 3. Report for the Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, p.75

[22] Philip M.S.. Measuring trees and forests, 1994 2nd ed. Wallingford: CAB International

[23] Quazi S.A., Mark S.A., Thadani R.. Regeneration of Monodominant Stands of Banj Oak (Quercus leucotrichophora A. Camus) on Abandoned Terraces in the Central Himalayas. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 2003, 17(4): 75-90.

[24] Rana B.S., Singh S.P., Singh R.P.. Biomass and net primary productivity in central Himalayan forests along altitudinal gradient. J For Ecol & Manag, 1989, 27: 199-218.

[25] Rayment G.E., Higginson F.R.. Australian Laboratory Handbook of Soil and Water Chemical Methods — Australian Soil and Land Survey Handbook. 1992, Inkata Press: Melbourne & Sydney

[26] Reichle D.E.. Dynamic properties of forest ecosystem. 1981, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 657.

[27] Roy J., Saugier B., Mooney H.A.. Terrestrial global productivity. 2001, San Diego: Academic Press, 573.

[28] Shrestra B.M., Situala B.K., Singh B.R., Bajracharya R.M.. Soil Organic carbon stocks in soil aggregates under different land use systems in Nepal. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys, 2007, 70(2): 201-213.

[29] Singh S.P., Adhikari B.S., Zobel D.B.. Biomass, productivity, leaf longevity and forest structure in the Central Himalaya. Ecological Monographs, 1994, 64(4): 401-421.

[30] Speranza F., Villa I.M., Sagnotti L., Florindo F., Cosentino D., Cipollari P., Mattei M.. Age of the Corsica-Sardinia rotation and Liguro-Provencal Basin spreading: New paleomagnetic and Ar/Ar evidence. Tectonophysics, 1995, 347: 231-225.

[31] Tanvir A.. Reports Submitted to the Regional Expert Consultation on Eucalyptus in Pakistan. 1995, Pakistan: Pakistan Forest Institute Peshawar, 274.

[32] Toky O.P., Bisht R.P.. Above ground and below ground biomass allocation in important fuelwood trees from arid north-western India. J Arid Environment, 1993, 25: 315-320.

[33] Villalobos F.J., Testi L., Hidalgo J., Pastor M., Orgaz F.. Modelling potential growth and yield of Olive (Olea europea. L) canopies. Europ J Agronomy, 2006, 24: 296-303.

[34] Walkley A., Black J.A.. An examination of the Degtjaref method for determining soil organic matter and proposed modification of the chromic titration method. Soil Sci, 1934, 37: 29-38.

[35] Whittaker R.H.. Community and Ecosystems (2 ^nd Edition). 1975, New York: MacMillan