Application of fractal theory in assessing soil aggregates in Indian tropical ecosystems

Abstract

Soil aggregation varies according to climatic and management factors, and is difficult to measure because of irregular shapes and sizes of soil aggregates. We applied fractal theory to assess soil aggregation as affected by (1) land use change from forest to savanna, (2) nutrient additions in forest, ecotone, and savanna ecosystems, and (3) tillage practice and residue treatments in an agro-ecosystem. We used fractal dimensions nonlinear (D _non-lin) and linear (D _lin) based on number of aggregates (N) and mass of aggregates (M) (the range of values were 2.6–2.89 and 2.69–3.41, respectively) to capture the variations in the sizes of soil aggregates due to land use and treatments/management in these ecosystems. The variation in the values of non-linear fractal dimension based on mass (D _Mnon-lin) was smaller in forest and savanna ecosystems with and without nutrient additions, while the variation was wider in agro-ecosystems with different management practices. Linear fractal dimensions based on number (D _Nlin) and mass (D _Mlin) of aggregates varied marginally in these ecosystems and did not capture the variations in soil aggregates well. The variations in non-linear fractal dimension indicate that continued nitrogen loading in forest accelerates the formation of macro-aggregates, whereas in savanna the situation was reversed. The values of non-linear fractal dimensions did not show significant change after 6 years of nutrient additions in the ecotone; reflecting a buffering mechanism of this system in soil aggregate formation. On the basis of non-linear fractal dimension values, we conclude that residue retention and minimum tillage are appropriate for proper maintenance of soil aggregate stability for sustained crop production in the Indian dry land agro-ecosystems.

Keywords

soil aggregates / fractal / tillage practice / ecosystem / Indian dry tropics

References

[1] Baldock J.A., Kay B.D.. Influence of cropping history and chemical treatments on the water stable aggregation of a silt loam soil. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 1987, 67: 501-511.

[2] Barthes G.B., Kouakoua E., Larre-Larrour M.C., Razafimbelo T.M., de Luca E.F., Azontonde A., Neves C.S.V.J., de Freitas P.L., Feller C.L.. Texture and sesquioxide effects on water-stable aggregates and organic matter in some tropical soils. Geoderma, 2008, 143: 14-25.

[3] Blanco-Canqui H., Lal R.. Mechanisms of carbon sequestration in soil aggregates. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 2004, 23: 481-504.

[4] Brady N.C.. The Nature and properties of soils. 1984, New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall, 992.

[5] Cheng C., Wang Y., Wang Y., Pan Yujuan.. Soil fractal features of typical forest stands in Jinyun Mountain, Chongqing City, Southwest China. Frontiers of Forestry in China, 2007, 2(4): 429-435.

[6] Elliott E.T.. Aggregate structure and carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in native and cultivated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1986, 50: 626-633.

[7] Gardener W.R.. Representation of soil aggregate-size distribution by a logarithmic-normal distribution. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1956, 20: 151-153.

[8] Gold H.J.. Mathematical modeling of biological systems. 1977, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 357.

[9] Gyldenkaerne S., Jorgenson S.E.. Modelling the bioavailabilty of pesticides to soil-dwelling organisms. Ecological Modelling, 2000, 132: 203-230.

[10] Kuperman R.G.. Litter decomposition and nutrient dynamics in oak-hickory forests along historic gradients of nitrogen and sulfur depositions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1999, 31: 237-244.

[11] Kushwaha C.P., Tripathi S.K., Singh K.P.. Soil organic matter and water stable aggregates under different tillage and residue conditions in a tropical dryland agroecosystem. Applied Soil Ecology, 2001, 16: 229-241.

[12] Mandelbrot B.B.. The fractal geometry of nature. 1982, San Francisco: Publisher W.H. Freeman, 460.

[13] Martin M.A., Pachepsky Y.A., Perfect E.. Scaling, fractals and diversity in soils and ecohydrology. Ecological Modelling, 2005, 182: 217-220.

[14] Mazurak A.P.. Effect of gaseous phase on water stable synthetic aggregates. Soil Science, 1950, 69: 135-148.

[15] McBratney A.B.. Comments on “Fractal dimension of soil aggregate size distribution calculated by number and mass”. Soil Science Society of America Journals, 1993, 57 1393

[16] Malhotra C.L., Das S.K., Saxena V.P.. Soil survey and soil work in Uttar Pradesh. 1972, Uttar Pradesh (India): Department of Agriculture, 360.

[17] Jiangming M., Sandra B., Jinghua X., Yunting F., Zhian Li.. Response of litter decomposition to simulated nitrogen deposition in disturbed, rehabilitated and mature forests in subtropical China. Plant and Soil, 2006, 282: 135-151.

[18] Oades J.M., Waters A.G.. Aggregate hierarchy in soils. Australian Journal of Soil Reseasrch, 1991, 29: 815-828.

[19] Oades J.M.. The role of biology in the formation, stabilization and degradation of soil structure. Geoderma, 1993, 56: 377-400.

[20] Pachepsky Y.A., Gimenez D., Rawls W.J.. Pachepsky Y.A., Crawford J., Rawls W.. Bibliography on applications of fractals in soil science. Fractals in soil science. 2000, Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier, 273 295

[21] Pachepsky Y.A., Perfect E., Martin M.A.. Fractal geometry applied to soil and related hierarchical systems. Geoderma, 2006, 134: 237-239.

[22] Pachepsky Y.A., Radcliffe D.E., Selim H.M.E., Selim H.M.. Scaling methods in soil physics. 2003, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 434.

[23] Perfect E., Blevins R.L.. Fractal characterization of soil aggregation and fragmentation as influenced by tillage treatment. Soil Science Society of America Journals, 1997, 61: 896-900.

[24] Perfect E., Kay B.D., Rasiah V.. Multifractal model for soil aggregate fragmentation. Soil Science Society of America Journals, 1993, 57: 896-900.

[25] Perfect E., Kay B.D., Rasiah V.. Unbiased estimation of the fractal dimension of the soil aggregate size distribution. Soil and Tillage Research, 1994, 31: 187-198.

[26] Perfect E., Kay B.D.. Fractal theory applied to soil aggregation. Soil Science Society of America Journals, 1991, 55: 1552-1558.

[27] Perfect E., Kenst A.B., Diaz-Zorita M., Grove J.H.. Fractal analysis of soil water desorption data collected on disturbed samples with water activity meters. Soil Science Society of America Journals, 2004, 68: 1177-1184.

[28] Perfect E., Rasiah V., Kay B.D.. Fractal Dimension of soil aggregate size distributions calculated on number and mass. Soil Science Society of America Journals, 1992, 56: 1407-1409.

[29] Pirmoradian N., Sepashkhah A.R., Hajabbasi M.A.. Application of fractal theory to quantify soil aggregates as influenced by tillage treatments. Biosystems Engineering, 2005, 2: 227-234.

[30] Puri A.M., Puri B.R.. Physical characteristics of soil. II. Expressing mechanical analysis and state of aggregation of soil by using single values. Soil Science, 1939, 33: 141-163.

[31] Rasiah V., Biederbeck V.O.. Fractal dimension of soil aggregation: influence of bulk density, fitting procedure, and oily waste sludge incorporation. Soil Science, 1995, 160: 250-255.

[32] Rasiah V., Kay B.D., Perfect E.. Evaluation of selected factors influencing aggregate fragmentation using fractal theory. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 1992, 72: 97-106.

[33] Rasiah V., Kay B.D., Perfect E.. New mass-based model for estimating fractal dimension of soil aggregates. Soil Science Society of America Journals, 1993, 57: 891-895.

[34] Rasiah V., Perfect E., Kay B.D.. Linear and nonlinear estimates of fractal dimension for soil aggregate fragmentation. Soil Science Society of America Journals, 1995, 59: 83-87.

[35] Sepashkhah A.R., Moosavi S.A.A., Boersma L.. Evaluation of fractal dimension for analysis of aggregate stability. Iran Agriculture Research, 2000, 19: 99-114.

[36] Silvia S., Eleonora B., Ermanno Z.. Mass-size fractal dimension of primary and aggregated particles and soil profile development. Soil Science, 2008, 173: 87-95.

[37] Smith D.L., Schnable R.R., McNeal B.L., Campbell G.S.. Potential error in the first-order model for estimating soil nitrogen mineralization potentials. Soil Science Society of America Journals, 1980, 44: 996-1000.

[38] Strudley M.W., Green T.R., Ascough J.C. II. Tillage effects on soil hydraulic properties in space and time: State of the science. Soil Tillage Research, 2008, 99: 4-48.

[39] Tisdale J.M., Smith S.E., Rengasamy P.. Aggregation of soil by fungal hyphae. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 1997, 35: 55-60.

[40] Tripathi S.K., Kushwaha C.P., Singh K.P.. Tropical forest and savanna ecosystems show differential impact of N and P additions on soil organic matter and aggregate structure. Global Change Biology, 2008, 14: 2572-2581.

[41] Tyler S.W., Wheatcraft S.W.. Fractal scaling of soil particle size distribution: Analysis and limitations. Soil Science Society of America Journals, 1992, 56: 362-369.

[42] Van Bavel C.H.M.. Mean weight diameter of soil aggregates as a statistical index of aggregation. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 1949, 14: 20-23.

[43] Yue T. X., Liu J. Y., Jørgensen S. E., Ye Q. H.. Landscape change detection of the newly created wetland in Yellow River Delta. Ecological Modelling, 2003, 164(1): 21-31.