Stem taper equations for poplars growing on farmland in Sweden

Birger Hjelm

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2012, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1) : 15 -22.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2012, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1) : 15 -22. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-012-0270-4
Original Paper

Stem taper equations for poplars growing on farmland in Sweden

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

We developed a simple polynomial taper equation for poplars growing on former farmland in Sweden and also evaluated the performance of some well-known taper equations. In Sweden there is an increasing interest in the use of poplar. Effective management of poplar plantations for high yield production would be facilitated by taper equations providing better predictions of stem volume than currently available equations. In the study a polynomial stem taper equation with five parameters was established for individual poplar trees growing on former farmland. The outputs of the polynomial taper equation were compared with five published equations. Data for fitting the equations were collected from 69 poplar trees growing at 37 stands in central and southern Sweden (lat. 55–60° N). The mean age of the stands was 21 years (range 14–43), the mean density 984 stems·ha−1 (198–3,493), and the mean diameter at breast height (outside bark) 25 cm (range 12–40). To verify the tested equations, performance of accuracy and precision diameter predictions at seven points along the stem was closely analyzed. Statistics used for evaluation of the equations indicated that the variable exponent taper equation presented by Kozak (1988) performed best and can be recommended. The stem taper equation by Kozak (1988) recommended in the study is likely to be beneficial for optimising the efficiency and profitability of poplar plantation management. The constructed polynomial equation and the segmented equation presented by Max & Burkhart (1976) were second and third ranked. Due to the statistical complexity of Kozak’s equation, the constructed polynomial equation is alternatively recommended when a simple model is requested and larger bias is accepted.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Birger Hjelm. Stem taper equations for poplars growing on farmland in Sweden. Journal of Forestry Research, 2012, 24(1): 15-22 DOI:10.1007/s11676-012-0270-4

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Assmann E.. The Principles of Forest Yield Study. 1970, New York: Pergamon Press, 506.

[2]

Benbrahim M., Gavaland A.. A new stem taper function for short-rotation poplar. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2003, 18: 377-383.

[3]

Christersson L, Verwijst T. 2006. Poppel. Sammanfattningar från ett seminarium vid Institutionen för Lövträdsodling, SLU, Uppsala 15 mars, 2005. In: Proceedings from a Poplar seminar at the Department of Short Rotation Forestry, SLU, Uppsala, Sweden.

[4]

Christersson L.. Wood production potential in poplar plantations in Sweden. Biomass & Bioenergy, 2010, 34(9): 1289-1299.

[5]

Clark AIII, Souter RA, Schlaegel BE. 1991. Stem profile equations for southern tree species (Research Paper SE-282). USDA Forest Service, p.113

[6]

Demaerschalk J.P.. Converting volume equations to compatible taper equations. Forest Science, 1972, 18: 241-245.

[7]

Demaerschalk J.P.. Integrated systems for the estimation of tree taper and volume. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1973, 3: 90-94.

[8]

Diaz-Marato I.J., Fernández-Parajes J., Vila-Lameiro P., Baracala-Pérez E.. Site index model for natural stands of rebollo oak (Quercus pyrenaica Willd.) in Galicia, NW Iberian Peninsula. Ciencia Forestal, 2010, 20(1): 57-68.

[9]

Diéguez-Aranda U., Burkhart H.E., Amateis R.L.. Dynamic site model for Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations in the United States. Forest Science, 2006, 52(3): 262-272.

[10]

Diéguez-Aranda U., Castedo-Dorado F., Álvarez-González J.G., Rojo A.. Compatible taper function for Scots pine plantations in northwestern Spain. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2006, 36: 1190-1205.

[11]

Diéguez-Aranda U., Grandaz-Arias J.A., Álvarez-Gonzáles J.G., Gadow K.V.. Site quality curves for birch stands in North-Western Spain. Silva Fennica, 2006, 40(4): 631-644.

[12]

Elfving B., Kiviste A.. Construction of site index equations for Pinus sylvestris L. using permanent plot data in Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management, 1997, 98: 125-134.

[13]

Eriksson H., Johansson U., Kiviste A.. A site-index model for pure and mixed stands of Betula pendula and Betula pubescens in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 1997, 12: 49-156.

[14]

Fang Z., Bailey R.L.. Compatible volume and taper models with coefficients for tropical species on Hainan Island in Southern China. Forest Science, 1999, 45: 85-99.

[15]

Figueiredo-Filho A., Borders B., Hith K.L.. Taper equations for Pinus taeda plantations in Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management, 1996, 83: 39-46.

[16]

Figueiredo-Filho A., Schaaf L.B.. Comparison between predicted volumes estimated by taper equations and true volumes obtained by the water displacement technique (xylometer). Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1999, 29: 451-461.

[17]

Gray HR. 1956. The form and taper of forest tree stems. Institute paper 32. 84 pp. Imperial Forestry Institute. University of Oxford.

[18]

Huang S., Yang Y., Wang Y.. Amaro A., Reed D., Soares P.. A critical look at procedures for validating growth and yield models. Modeling Forest Systems. 2003, Wallingford: EEUU. CAB International, 271 293

[19]

Jonsson V. 2008. Silvicultural experiences of Poplar Populus sp. in the Swedish province of Skåne. M.Sc thesis. Department of Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU). Alnarp. Sweden. (In Swedish with English summary).

[20]

Karačić A.. Production and ecological aspects of short rotation poplars in Sweden, 2005, 13: 1-42.

[21]

Karlsson K.. Growth allocation and stand structure in Norway spruce stands — Expected taper and diameter distribution in stands subjected to different thinning regimes, 2005, 75: 1-35.

[22]

Kozak A., Kozak R.A.. Does cross validation provide additional information in the evaluation of regression models?. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2003, 33: 976-987.

[23]

Kozak A., Munro D.D., Smith J.H.G.. Taper functions and their applications in forest inventory. The Forestry Chronicle, 1969, 45: 278-283.

[24]

Kozak A.. A variable exponent taper equation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1988, 18: 1363-1368.

[25]

Kozak A.. Effect of multicollinearity and auto correlation on the variable-exponent taper equations. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1997, 27: 619-629.

[26]

Kozak A.. My last words on taper equations. The Forestry Chronicle, 2004, 80: 507-515.

[27]

Lee W.K., Seo J.H., Son Y.M., Lee K.H., von Gadow K.. Modeling stem profiles for Pinus densiflora in Korea. Forest Ecology and Management, 2003, 172: 69-77.

[28]

Li R., Weiskittel A.R.. Comparison of model forms for estimating stem taper and volume in the primary conifer species of the North American Acadian Region. Annals of Forest Science, 2010, 67(3): 10-25.

[29]

Max T.A., Burkhart H.E.. Segmented polynomial regression applied to taper equations. Forest Science, 1976, 22: 283-289.

[30]

Monserud R.A.. Height growth and site index curves for inland Douglasfir based on stem analysis data and forest habitat types. Forest Science, 1984, 30(4): 945-965.

[31]

Muhairwe C.K.. Taper equations for Eucalyptus pilularis and Eucalyptus grandis for the north coast in New SouthWales, Australia. Forest Ecology and Management, 1999, 113: 251-269.

[32]

Newnham RM. 1988. A variable-form taper function. Canada Forest Service, Petawawa Nat. For. Ins. Inf. Rep. PI-X 83, 1–33.

[33]

Newnham R.M.. Variable-form taper functions for four Alberta tree species. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1992, 22: 210-223.

[34]

Nord-Larsen T.. Developing dynamic site index curve for European beech (Fagus sylvatica L) in Denmark. Forest Science, 2006, 52(2): 173-181.

[35]

Ormerod D.. A simple bole model. The Forestry Chronicle, 1973, 49: 136-138.

[36]

Parresol B.R., Hotvedt J.E., Cao Q.V.. A volume and taper prediction system for bald cypress. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1987, 17: 250-259.

[37]

Rayner M.E.. Site index and dominant height growth curves for regrowth karri (Eucalyptus diversicolor F. Muell.) in south-western Australia. Forest Ecology and Management, 1991, 44: 261-283.

[38]

Rytter L, Johansson T, Karačić A, Weih M. 2011. Orienterande studie om ett svenskt forskningsprogram för poppel. Summary: Investigation for a Swedish research program on the genus Populus. Skogforsk. Arbetsrapport nr 733, 165 pp. (In Swedish).

[39]

Sakici O.E., Misir N., Yavuz H., Misir M.. Stem taper functions for Abies nordmanniana subsp. bornmulleriana in Turkey. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2008, 23(6): 522-533.

[40]

SAS Institute Inc. 2006. Version 9.2. Cary. NC.

[41]

Sharma M., Oderwald R.G.. Dimensionally compatible volume and taper equations. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2001, 31: 797-803.

[42]

Sterba H.. Stem curves -A review of the literature. Forest Abstracts, 1980, 41(4): 141-145.

[43]

Steven B.J., Benee F.S.. Stem form changes in un-thinned slash and Loblolly Pine stands following midrotation fertilization. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 1988, 12(2): 90-97.

[44]

Yang Y., Huang S.. Modeling percent stocking changes for lodgepole pine stands in Alberta. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2008, 38: 1042-1052.

[45]

Yang Y., Huang S.. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling of variableexponent taper equations for lodgepole pine in Alberta, Canada. European Journal of Forest Research, 2009, 128: 415-419.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

171

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/