Over-mature beech trees (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) and close-to-nature forestry in northern Iran

Abstract

Oriental Beech is the most important commercial tree species in northern Iran. In recent years wood production companies interested in felling large beech trees for profit have challenged advocates of close-to-nature silviculture who favor conservation. Our study objective was to assess the economic value of over-mature beech trees by relating tree diameter (DBH) to amount of decay. Based on the location of onset of decay, we categorized three types of decay as stump, stem, and crown decay. Trees of greater diameter (age) typically showed greater decay in the stem. Percent of decayed volume, diameter of decayed tissue, and length of decay in tree stems varied between 0.5%–64.3%, 15 cm–75 cm, and 2.0–19.5 m, respectively. With increasing trunk diameter, the proportion of truck decay increased. Red heart and dark red heart constituted 25% and 14.3% of sampled trees, respectively. However, we found no correlation between intensity of stem decay and morphological characteristics of trees. Seedlings were not abundant around the bases of over-mature trees, suggesting that the trees did not contribute to regeneration of the stand. Beech trees of diameter >1 m do not provide valuable round wood for industries and cause to raise wood production costs. We recommend that these trees >1 m DBH should be retained in forest stands because of their low commercial value but high ecological and conservational values such as maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems.

Keywords

Caspian / forests / close-to-nature / forestry / Fagu / orientalis} / red / heart / and / stem / decay / Iran

References

[1] Boddy L., Rayner A.D.M.. Origins of decay in living deciduous trees: the role of moisture content and a re-appraisal of the expanded concept of tree decay. New Phytologist, 1983, 94(4): 623-641.

[2] Christensen M., Hahn K., Mountford E.P., Ódor P., Standovár T., Rozenbergar D., Diaci J., Wijdeven S., Meyer P., Winter S., Vrska T.. Dead wood in European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest reserves. Forest Ecology and Management, 2005, 210(1–3): 267-282.

[3] Collet C., Moguedec G.L.. Individual seedling mortality as a function of size, growth and competition in naturally regenerated beech seedlings. Forestry, 2007, 80(4): 359-370.

[4] Dusan R., Mikac S., Igor A., Jurij D.. Gap regeneration patterns in relationship to light heterogeneity in two old-growth beech-fir forest reserves in South East Europe. Forestry, 2007, 80(4): 431-443.

[5] Forget P.M.. Regeneration ecology of Eperua grandiflora (Caesalpiniaceae), a large-seeded tree in French Guiana. Biotropica, 1992, 24(2a): 146-156.

[6] Have R.T., Teunissen P.J.. Oxidative mechanisms involved in lignin degradation by white-rot fungi. Chemical Review, 2001, 101(11): 3397-3413.

[7] Hagrey S.A.. Geophysical imaging of root-zone, trunk, and moisture heterogeneity. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2007, 58(4): 839-854.

[8] Heyder J.C.. Waldbau im Wandel. 1986, Frankfurt am Main: J.D. Sauerländer’s Verlag

[9] Heilmann-Clausen J., Christensen M.. Fungal diversity on decaying beech logs —implications for sustainable forestry. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2003, 12(5): 953-973.

[10] Heilmann-Clausen J., Christensen M.. Does size matter? On the importance of various dead wood fractions for fungal diversity in Danish beech forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004, 201(1): 105-117.

[11] Hummel S.. Height, diameter and crown dimensions of Cordia alliodora associated with tree density. Forest Ecology and Management, 2000, 127(1–3): 31-40.

[12] Knoke T.. Value of complete information on red heartwood formation in beech (Fagus sylvatica L. Silva Fennica, 2002, 36(4): 841-851.

[13] Knoke T.. Predicting red heartwood formation in beech trees (Fagus sylvatica L. Ecological Modelling, 2003, 169(2–3): 295-312.

[14] Laurance W.F., Henrique E.M.N., Laurance S.G., Condit R., Angelo S.D., Andrade A.. Inferred longevity of Amazonian rainforest trees based on a long-term demographic study. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004, 190(2–3): 131-143.

[15] Lee P.. Dynamics of snags in aspen-dominated midboreal forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 1998, 105(1–3): 263-272.

[16] Leibundgut H.. Führen naturnahe Waldbauverfahren zur betriebswirtschaftlichen Erfolgsverbesserung?. Forstarchiv, 1983, 54: 47-51. (Do close-to-nature forestry practices lead to economic improvement?)

[17] Lekounougou S., Mounguengui S., Dumarcay S., Rose C., Courty P.E., Garbaye J., Gérardin P., Jacquot J.P., Gelhaye E.. Initial stages of Fagus sylvatica wood colonization by the white-rot basidiomycete Trametes versicolor: Enzymatic characterization. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2008, 61(4): 287-293.

[18] Liu S., Loup C., Gril J., Dumonceaud O., Thibaut B.. Studies on European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Part 1: Variations of wood color parameters. Annals of Forest Science, 2005, 62: 625-632.

[19] Marvie Mohadjer M.R.. Silviculture. 2005, Tehran: University of Tehran Press

[20] Mohebby B.. Attenuated total reflection infrared spectroscopy of white-rot decayed beech wood. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2005, 55(4): 247-251.

[21] Moradi M.. Morphology and health of over matured beech trees in Sisatan forest. 2009, Tehran: University of Tehran, 60.

[22] Nicolotti G., Miglietta P.. Using high-technology instruments to assess defects in trees. Journal of Arboriculture, 1998, 24(6): 297-302.

[23] Otto H.-J.. Der dynamische Wald — Ökologische Grundlagen des naturnahen Waldbaues. (The dynamic forest — ecological basis of close-to-nature forestry). Forst und Holz, 1993, 48: 331-333.

[24] Parhizkar P., Sagheb-Talebi K., Mataji A., Nyland R., Namiranian M.. Silvicultural characteristics of Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) rgeneration under different RLI and positions within gaps. Forestry, 2011, 84(2): 177-185.

[25] Parson S., Lewis K.J., Psyllakis J.M.. Relationship between roosting habitat of bats and decay of aspen in the sub boreal forests of British Columbia. Forest Ecology and Management, 2003, 177(1–3): 559-570.

[26] Pearce R.B.. Decay development and its restriction in trees. Journal of Arboriculture, 2000, 26(1): 1-11.

[27] Putz F.E., Coley P.D., Lu K., Montalva A., Aiello A.. Uprooting and snapping of trees: structural determinants and ecological consequences. Can J For Res, 1983, 13: 1011-1020.

[28] Rayner A.D.M., Boddy L.. Fungal Decomposition of Wood: its biology and ecology. 1988, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 587.

[29] Rice W.. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution, 1989, 43(1): 223-225.

[30] Richter J.. Buchenrotkern: Vermeiden oder Verwerten?. Forst und Holz, 2001, 56: 662-664.

[31] Schütz J.-Ph.. Bedeutung und Möglichkeiten der biologischen Rationalisierung im Forstbetrieb. Schweiz. Z. Forstwes., 1996, 147: 315-349.

[32] Seeling U.. Kerntypen im Holz—Konsequenzen für die Verwertung am Beispiel der Buche (Fagus sylvatica L. Schweiz Z Forstwes, 1998, 149: 991-1004.

[33] Sefidi K., Mohadjer M.M.. Characteristics of coarse woody debris in succession of natural beech (Fagus Orientalis) forests of Northern Iran, 2010. Journal of Forest Science, 2010, 56(1): 7-17.

[34] Sefidi K., Mohadjer M.M.R., Etemad V., Copenheaver C.. Stand characteristics and distribution of a relict population of Persian ironwood (Parrotia persica C.A. Meyer) in northern Iran. Flora, 2011, 206(5): 418-422.

[35] Sefidi K., Marvie Mohadjer M.R., Mosandl R., Copenheaver C.A.. Canopy gaps and regeneration in old-growth Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) stands, northern Iran. Forest Ecology and Management., 2011, 262(6): 1094-1099.

[36] Szwagrzyk J., Szewczyk J., Bodziarczyk J.. Dynamics of seedling ban ks in beech forest: results of a 10-year study on germination, growth and survival. Forest Ecology and Management, 2001, 141(3): 237-250.

[37] Zabell Z.A., Morrell J.J.. Wood Microbiology, Decay and its Prevention. 1992, New York: Academic Press