Estimating canopy closure density and above-ground tree biomass using partial least square methods in Chinese boreal forests

Abstract

Boreal forests play an important role in global environment systems. Understanding boreal forest ecosystem structure and function requires accurate monitoring and estimating of forest canopy and biomass. We used partial least square regression (PLSR) models to relate forest parameters, i.e. canopy closure density and above ground tree biomass, to Landsat ETM+ data. The established models were optimized according to the variable importance for projection (VIP) criterion and the bootstrap method, and their performance was compared using several statistical indices. All variables selected by the VIP criterion passed the bootstrap test (p<0.05). The simplified models without insignificant variables (VIP <1) performed as well as the full model but with less computation time. The relative root mean square error (RMSE%) was 29% for canopy closure density, and 58% for above-ground tree biomass. We conclude that PLSR can be an effective method for estimating canopy closure density and above-ground biomass.

Keywords

above-ground tree biomass / bootstrap method / canopy closure density / partial least square regression (PLSR) / VIP criterion

References

[1] Carreiras J.M.B., Pereira J.M.C., Pereira J.S.. Estimation of tree canopy cover in evergreen oak woodlands using remote sensing. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006, 223: 45-53.

[2] Cho M., Skidmore A., Cors I. F., Van Wieren S., Sobhan I.. Estimation of green grass/herb biomass from airborne hyperspectral imagery using spectral indices and partial least squares regression. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation, 2007, 9: 414-424.

[3] Cohen W.B., Maiersperger T.K., Gower S.T., Turner D.P.. An improved strategy for regression of biophysical variables and Landsat ETM+ data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003, 84: 561-571.

[4] Crist E., Cicone R.. A physically-based transformation of thematic mapper data-the TM tasseled cap. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1984, 22: 256-263.

[5] Fang J.Y., Liu G.H., Xu S.L.. Biomass and net production of forest vegetation in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1996, 16: 497-508.

[6] Farifteh J., Van Der Meer F., Atzberger C., Carranza E.J.M.. Quantitative analysis of salt-affected soil reflectance spectra: A comparison of two adaptive methods (PLSR and ANN). Remote Sensing of Environment, 2007, 110: 59-78.

[7] Fiala A.C.S., Garman S.L., GRAY A.N.. Comparison of five canopy cover estimation techniques in the western Oregon Cascades. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006, 232: 188-197.

[8] Hansen P.M., Schjoerring J.K.. Reflectance measurement of canopy biomass and nitrogen status in wheat crops using normalized difference vegetation indices and partial least squares regression. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003, 86: 542-553.

[9] Hernandez-stefanoni J., Ponce-hernandez R.. Mapping the spatial variability of plant diversity in a tropical forest: comparison of spatial interpolation methods. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2006, 117: 307-334.

[10] Jakubauskas M.E., PRICE K.P.. Empirical relationships between structural and spectral factors of Yellowstone lodgepole pine forests. Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing, 1997, 63: 1375-1381.

[11] Joshi C., De Leeuw J., Skidmore A.K., Van Duren I.C., Van Oosten H.. Remotely sensed estimation of forest canopy density: A comparison of the performance of four methods. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2006, 8: 84-95.

[12] Lemay V., Maedel J., Coops N.C.. Estimating stand structural details using nearest neighbor analyses to link ground data, forest cover maps, and Landsat imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2008, 112: 2578-2591.

[13] Næsset E., Bollandsas O.M., Gobakken T.. Comparing regression methods in estimation of biophysical properties of forest stands from two different inventories using laser scanner data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2005, 94: 541-553.

[14] Price K., Guo X., Stiles J.. Optimal Landsat TM band combinations and vegetation indices for discrimination of six grassland types in eastern Kansas. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2002, 23: 5031-5042.

[15] Reese H., Nilsson M., Sandström P., Olsson H.. Applications using estimates of forest parameters derived from satellite and forest inventory data. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2002, 37: 37-55.

[16] Serneels S., Van Espen P.. Bootstrap confidence intervals for trilinear partial least squares regression. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2005, 544: 153-158.

[17] Wang H.W., Wu Z.B., Meng J.. Partial Least-Squares Regression — Linear and Nonlinear Methods. 2006, Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 35 123

[18] WU F.Z.. Forest Mensuration. 1996, Beijing: Chinese Forestry Publishing House, 174 202

[19] Wulder M., Han T., White J., Sweda T., Tsuzuki H.. Integrating profiling LIDAR with Landsat data for regional boreal forest canopy attribute estimation and change characterization. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2007, 110: 123-137.

[20] Zhao X.W., Li C.G.. Quantitative Estimation of Forest Resource Based on “3S”: Theory, Method Application and Software. 2001, Beijing: China Science and Technology Press, 12 46

[21] Zheng D., Rademacher J., Chen J., Crow T., Bresee M., Le Moine J., Ryu S.R.. Estimating aboveground biomass using Landsat 7 ETM+ data across a managed landscape in northern Wisconsin, USA. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2004, 93: 402-411.