Seasonal variations in species diversity, dry matter and net primary productivity of herb layer of Quercus leucotrichophora-Pinus roxburghii mixed forest in Kumaun Himalaya, India

Abstract

Plant biomass, species diversity and net primary productivity are presented for herb layer of banj oak (Quercus leucotrichophora A. Camus)-chir pine (Pinus roxburghii Sarg.) mixed forest in Kumaun, central Himalaya, India. The species diversity declined from a maximum (3.56) in September to a minimum (2.11) in December. The monthly live shoots biomass exhibited a single peak growth pattern with highest live shoot biomass of 185 g·m⁻² in August. The seasonal pattern showed that the maximum above-ground production (131 g·m⁻²) occurred during the rainy season and the minimum (1 g·m⁻²) during winter season. The below-ground production was maximum during winter season (84 g·m⁻²) and minimum during summer season (34 g·m⁻²). The annual net shoot production was 171 g·m⁻² and total below-ground production was 165 g·m⁻². Of the total input 61% was channeled to above-ground parts and 39% to below-ground parts. Transfer of live shoots to dead shoots compartments and that of dead shoots to litter compartments was 61% and 66%, respectively. The total dry matter disappearance was 61% of the total input within annual cycle. The herb layer showed a net accumulation of organic matter, indicating the seral nature of the community.

Keywords

above ground production / below ground production / litter mass / phytomass / turnover rate

References

[1] Bazzaz F.D., Bliss L.. Net primary production of herbs in Central Illinois deciduous forest. Bulletin of Torrey Botanical Club, 1971, 98: 90-91.

[2] Curtis J.T.. The Vegetation of Wisconsin. 1959, Madison Wisconsin: University Wisconsin press, 657.

[3] Dahlman R.C., Kucera C.L.. Root productivity and turnover in native prairie. Ecology, 1965, 46: 84-89.

[4] Das K., Chaturvedi O.P., Mandal M.P., Kumar R.. Effect of tree plantations on biomass and primary productivity of herbaceous vegetation in eastern India. Tropical Ecology, 2008, 49(2): 95-101.

[5] Ford E.D., Newbould P.J.. Stand structure and dry weight production through the sweet Chestnut (Castanea stavia Mill) coppice cycle. Journal of Ecology, 1977, 58: 275-296.

[6] Gupta S.R., Singh J.S.. Carbon balance of a tropical successional grassland. Acta Oecologia, Oecologia Generalis, 1982, 3: 459-467.

[7] Gupta S.R., Singh J.S.. Influence of floristic composition on the net primary production and dry matter turnover in a tropical grassland. Australian Journal of Ecology, 1982, 7: 363-374.

[8] Head G.C.. Phillipson J.. Methods for the study of production in root systems. Methods of study in Soil ecology. 1970, Paris: UNESCO, 151 157

[9] Hussain M.S., Sultana A., Khan J.A., Khan A.. Species composition and community structure of forest stands in Kumaon Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India. Tropical Ecology, 2008, 49(2): 167-181.

[10] Joshi M.. Seasonal pattern of cattle and goat grazing and its impact on Central Himalayan grazinglands. 1991, Nainital (India): Kumaun University, 209.

[11] Joshi M., Singh S.P., Rawat Y.S.. Analysis of grazingland vegetation of banj-oak (Quercus leucotrichophora A. Camus)- Chir-pine (Pinus roxburghii Sarg.) forest zone in Central Himalaya. Range Management and Agroforestry, 1994, 15(1): 1-9.

[12] Joshi M., Singh S.P., Rawat Y.S.. Plant forms and seasonality of leaves in herb layers of sites with varying levels of deforestation. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 1995, 6(4): 508-522.

[13] Kerns B.K., Ohmann J.L.. Evaluation and prediction of shrub cover in coastal Oregon forests (USA). Ecological Indicators, 2004, 4: 83-98.

[14] Kharkwal G., Mehrotra P., Rawat Y.S.. Biomass production of herb species in broad leaf forests in Kumaun Himalaya, India. Journal of Forestry Research, 2010, 21(3): 355-360.

[15] Muir PS, Mattingly RL, Tappeiner JC, Bailey JD, Elliott WE, Hagar JC, Miller JC, Peterson EB, Starkey EE. 2002. Managing for biodiversity in young Douglas-fir forests of western Oregon. U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Biological Science Report USGS/BRD/BSR-2002-0006.

[16] Polakowaski B., Endler Z.. Primary production of herb layer in forest and shrub communities of the Jorka river watershed. Pol Ecol Stu, 1985, 11(2): 321-336.

[17] Ram J., Singh J.S., Singh S.P.. Plant biomass, species diversity and net primary production in a Central Himalayan high altitude grassland. Journal of Ecology, 1989, 77: 456-468.

[18] Rana B.S., Singh S. P., Singh R. P.. Pangty Y.P.S., Joshi S.C.. Herb layer biomass and net primary productivity in different forest eco-systems of Kumaun Himalaya. Western Himalaya: Environment, problems and developments. 1987, Nainital, India: Gyanodaya Prakashan, 282 300

[19] Sah V.K., Ram J.. Biomass dynamics, species diversity and net primary production in a temperate grassland of Central Himalaya, India. Tropical Ecology, 1989, 30(2): 294-302.

[20] Saxena A.K., Singh J.S.. Analysis of forest geazingland vegetation in parts of Kumaun Himalaya. Indian Journal of Range Management, 1980, 1: 13-32.

[21] Schuuroman J.J., Goedewaagan M.A.J.. Methods for the Examination of root Systems and roots. 1964, Wageningen: Centre for Agricultural Publications and documents

[22] Sims P.L., Singh J.S.. The structure and function of ten Western North American grasslands. III. Net primary production, turn over, and efficiencies of energy capture and water use. Journal of Ecology, 1978, 66: 573-597.

[23] Sims P.L., Singh J.S.. The structure and function of ten Western North American grasslands. II. Inter-seasonal dynamics in primary producer compartments. Journal of Ecology, 1978, 66: 547-572.

[24] Sims P.L., Singh J.S.. The structure and function of ten Western North American grasslands. IV. Compartmental transfer and system transfer functions. Journal of Ecology, 1978, 66(3): 583-1009.

[25] Singh J.S., Krishnamurthy L.. Analysis of structure and function of tropical grassland vegetation of India. Indian review of Life Sciences, 1981, 1: 225-270.

[26] Singh J.S., Yadava P.S.. Seasonal variations in composition, plant biomass, and net primary productivity of a tropical grassland at Kurukshetra, India. Ecological Monographs, 1974, 44: 351-376.

[27] Singh S.P.. Structure and function of the low and high altitude grazingland ecosystems and their impact on livestock component in the Central Himalaya. 1991, Nainital, India: Kumaun University, 321.

[28] Smith R.L.. Ecology and Field Biology. 1980, New York: Harper and Row Publishers

[29] Snedecor G.W., Cochran W.G.. Statistical Methods, 1967 6th Edition New Delhi, India: IBH and Oxford Publication Company

[30] Suchar V.A., Crookston N.L.. Understory cover and biomass indices predictions for forest ecosystems of the Northwestern United States. Ecological Indicators, 2010, 10: 602-609.

[31] Tremblay N.O., Larocque G.R.. Seasonal dynamics of understory vegetation in four eastern Canadian forest types. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 2001, 162: 271-286.