Territory and territorial behavior of migrating Common Coot (Fulica atra)

Wei-wei Zhang , Wei Liu , Jian-zhang Ma

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2011, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (2) : 289 -294.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2011, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (2) : 289 -294. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-011-0164-x
Original Paper

Territory and territorial behavior of migrating Common Coot (Fulica atra)

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Territory and territorial behavior of the Common Coot (Fulica atra) were studied in two breeding sites, Anbanghe Nature Reserve and Daqing Longfeng wetland, in Heilongjiang Province, China from April to October in 2008 and 2009. In the breeding season, the breeding pairs occupied an area and protected it throughout the reproduction, and both interspecific and intraspecific conflicts were observed. Territory activities became severe since early May, the peak of territory behaviors appeared at late May, and then declined gradually. The territorial activities level was higher than that in the nest building period than in the laying and incubation periods. The most adopted behavioral model was expelling, which was the least energy cost. The degree of territorial behavior tended to be descended since the development of breeding phase. The territory size differed from 1 333 m2 to above 5 000 m2. Wintering population was observed in Poyang Lake of Jiangxi Province. The coots gathered in the open water; however, there was no territory behavior both in the interspecies and intraspecies in wintering sites. The hypotheses why there was territory behaviors for coots both in the interspecies and intraspecies were also discussed.

Keywords

The Common Coot (Fulica atra) / territoriality / territorial behavior / territory size / breeding, migrating

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Wei-wei Zhang, Wei Liu, Jian-zhang Ma. Territory and territorial behavior of migrating Common Coot (Fulica atra). Journal of Forestry Research, 2011, 22(2): 289-294 DOI:10.1007/s11676-011-0164-x

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Alisauskas R.T.. Morphometric correlates of age and breeding status in American Coots. Auk, 1987, 104: 640-646.

[2]

Bennett L.J.. The blue-winged teal, its ecology and management. 1938, Ames USA: Collegiate press, 144.

[3]

Cavé A.J., Visser J., Perdeck A.C.. Size and quality of the coot Fulica atra territory in relation to age of its tenants and neighbours. Ardea, 1989, 77: 87-98.

[4]

Cramp S.. Notes on territory in the coot. Brit Birds, 1947, 40: 194-198.

[5]

Densley M.. Coot eating Black-headed Gull’s eggs. Brit Birds, 1966, 59 306.

[6]

Finck P.. Seasonal variation of territory size with the Little Owl (Athene noctua). Oecologia, 1990, 83: 68-75.

[7]

Fredrickson L.H.. Breeding biology of American Coots in Iowa. The Wilson Bulletin, 1970, 82(4): 445-457.

[8]

Gao J., Ma Jianzhang.. The behavior of incompletes brood parasitism of two pochard species. Zool Res, 1992, 4: 327-329.

[9]

Gray S.J., Jensen S.P., Hurst J.L.. Effects of resource distribution on activity and territory defence in house mice, Mus domesticus. Animal Behaviour, 2002, 63(3): 531-539.

[10]

Gullion G.W.. The display and calls of the American Coot. The Wilson Bulletin, 1952, 64: 83-97.

[11]

Gullion G.W.. Territorial behavior of the American coot. The Condor, 1953, 55: 169-186.

[12]

Hixon M.A.. Food production and competitor density as the determinants of feeding territory size. The American Naturalist, 1980, 115(4): 510-530.

[13]

Hixon M.A.. Energy maximizers and time minimizers: theory and reality. The American Naturalist, 1982, 119: 596-599.

[14]

Huxley J.S.. A natural experiment on the territorial instinct. Brit Birds, 1934, 27: 270-277.

[15]

Hyman J., Hughes M.. Territory owners discriminate between aggressive and nonaggressive neighbours. Animal Behaviour, 2006, 72: 209-215.

[16]

Ioana C., Morton S.E., Stutchbury B.J.M.. Incubation delays territory defence by male blue-headed vireos, Vireo solitarius. Animal Behaviour, 2007, 73: 143-148.

[17]

Johnsson J.I., Carlsson M., Sundström L.F.. Habitat preference increases territorial defence in brown trout (Salmo trutta). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2000, 48(5): 373-377.

[18]

Low J.B.. Nesting of the ruddy duck in Iowa. Auk, 1941, 58: 506-517.

[19]

Lyon B.E., Eadie M.J.. An obligate brood parasite trapped in the intraspecific arms race of its hosts. Nature, 2004, 432: 390-393.

[20]

Petrie M.. Territory size in the moorhen (Gallinula chloropus): An outcome of RHP asymmetry between neighbours. Animal Behaviour, 1984, 32(3): 861-870.

[21]

Philips J.C.. A natural history of ducks. Vol.3. 1925, Boston: Houghton-Mifflin Co.

[22]

Ryan M.R., Dinsmore J.J.. The behavioral ecology of breeding American Coots in relation to age. The Condor, 1980, 82: 320-327.

[23]

Schoener T.W.. Simple models of optimal feeding-territory size: a reconciliation. The American Naturalist, 1983, 121: 608-629.

[24]

Smith M.J., Price G.R.. The logic of animal conflict. Nature, 1973, 246: 15-18.

[25]

Stamps J.A., Krishnan V.V.. Functions of fights in territory establishment. The American Naturalist, 1997, 150: 393-405.

[26]

Stephan B.. Die evolutive Bedeutung der Territorialität bei Vögeln. Falke, 1976, 23(9): 297-305.

[27]

Tinbergen N.. The function of territory. Bird Study, 1957, 4: 14-27.

[28]

Visser J.. Seasonal changes in shield size in the Coot. Ardea, 1988, 76: 56-63.

[29]

Weller M.W.. Parasitic egg laying in the Redhead (Aythya Americana) and other North American Anatidae. Ecological Monographs, 1959, 19: 33-365.

[30]

Weller M.W.. The breeding biology of the parasitic Black-headed Duck. Living Bird, 1968, 7: 169-207.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

163

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/