Comparison of the fraction of olfactory receptor pseudogenes in wolf (Canis lupus) with domestic dog (Canis familiaris)

Hong-hai Zhang , Qin-guo Wei , Huan-xin Zhang , Lei Chen

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2011, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (2)

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2011, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (2) DOI: 10.1007/s11676-011-0162-z
Original Paper

Comparison of the fraction of olfactory receptor pseudogenes in wolf (Canis lupus) with domestic dog (Canis familiaris)

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Olfactory receptors (ORs), the first dedicated molecules with which odorants physically interact to arouse an olfactory sensation, constitute the largest gene family in vertebrates. Dogs and wolves, like many other mammals, have a highly developed capability to detect and identify odorant molecules, even at minimum concentrations. In this study, the olfactory receptor repertoire from domestic dog and its closest relative, the wolf, were sequenced to estimate the fraction of pseudogenes in each subspecies. The fraction of disrupted olfactory receptor genes in dog was 17.78%, whereas, that in wolf was 12.08%. As expected the dog was less dependent on olfaction than the wolf, and the dog had more olfactory receptor pseudogenes. However, the observed difference between the two subspecies was not at the significant level (χ 2 = 1.388, p = 0.239 > 0.05). The values indicated that although domestication might play a role in the reduction of OR genes, it could not be concluded that the living environment provided by domestication lead to a significant reduction of the functional olfactory receptor repertoire. Furthermore, the purpose of domestication may also have influence on the ratio of functional olfactory receptor genes reduction.

Keywords

olfactory receptor / wolf / domestic dog / pseudogene

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hong-hai Zhang, Qin-guo Wei, Huan-xin Zhang, Lei Chen. Comparison of the fraction of olfactory receptor pseudogenes in wolf (Canis lupus) with domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Journal of Forestry Research, 2011, 22(2): DOI:10.1007/s11676-011-0162-z

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Buck L., Axel R.. A novel multigene family may encode odorantreceptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell, 1991, 65(1): 175-187.

[2]

Fuchs T., Malecova B., Linhart C., Sharan R., Khen M., Herwig R., Shmulevich D., Elkon R., Steinfath M., O’Brien J.K., Radelof U., Lehrach H., Lancet D., Shamir R.. DEFOG: a practical scheme for deciphering families of genes. Genomics, 2002, 80(3): 295-302.

[3]

Gilad Y., Man O., Pääbo S., Lancet D.. Human specific loss of olfactory receptor genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2003, 100(6): 3324-3327.

[4]

Gilad Y., Przeworski M., Lancet D.. Loss of olfactory receptor genes coincides with the acquisition of full trichromatic vision in primates. PLoS Biology, 2004, 2 1 E5

[5]

Glusman G., Bahar A., Sharon D., Pilpel Y., White J., Lancet D.. The olfactory receptor gene superfamily: data mining, classification, and nomenclature. Mamm Genome, 2000, 11(11): 1016-1023.

[6]

Glusman G., Yanai I., Rubin I., Lancet D.. The complete human olfactory subgenome. Genome Res, 2001, 11(5): 685-702.

[7]

Godfrey P.A., Malnic B., Buck L.B.. The mouse olfactory receptor gene family. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2004, 101: 2156-2161.

[8]

Lander E.S., Linton L.M., Birren B., et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature, 2001, 409(6822): 860-921.

[9]

Matarazzo V., Tirard A., Renucci M., Belaïch A., Clément J.L.. Isolation of putative olfactory receptor sequences from pig nasal epithelium. Neuroscience Letters, 1998, 249(2–3): 87-90.

[10]

Matasci N.. Did Domestication Reduce the Fraction of Functional Olfactory Receptors in Pig?. 2003, Zurich: Max Planck Institut

[11]

Mombaerts P.. Molecular biology of odorant receptors in vertebrates. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 1999, 22: 487-509.

[12]

Olender T., Fuchs T., Linhart C., Shamir R., Adams M., Kalush F., Khen M., Lancet D.. The canine olfactory subgenome. Genomics, 2004, 83(3): 361-372.

[13]

Price E.O.. Price E. O.. Approaches to the study of domestication. Animal Domestication and Behaviour. 2002, Wallingford, Oxon, UK: CABI Publishing, 13 20

[14]

Price E.O.. Price E. O.. Behavioural development in captive animals. Animal domestication and behavior. 2002, Wallingford, Oxon, UK: CABI Publishing, 161 181

[15]

Rouquier S., Blancher A., Giorgi D.. The olfactory receptor gene repertoire in primates and mouse: evidence for reduction of the functional fraction in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2002, 97: 2870-2874.

[16]

Sambrook J., Russell D.W.. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2001, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor

[17]

Savolainen P., Zhang Y.P., Luo J., Lundeberg J., Leitner T.. Genetic Evidence for an East Asian Origin of Domestic Dogs. Science, 2002, 298(22): 1610-1613.

[18]

Scott J.P., Fuller J.L.. Genetics and the Social Behavior of the Dog. 1965, Chicago: Univ Chicago Press

[19]

Strausfeld N.J., Hildebrand J.G.. Olfactory systems: common design, uncommon origins?. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 1999, 9(5): 634-639.

[20]

Wagner E., Lykke A.J.. mRNA surveillance: the perfect persist. J Cell Sci, 2002, 115(Pt15): 3033-3038.

[21]

Young J.M., Trask B.J.. The sense of smell: genomics of vertebrate odorant receptors. Hum Mol Genet, 2002, 11(10): 1153-1160.

[22]

Zhang X., Firestein S.. The olfactory receptor gene superfamily of the mouse. Nature Neuroscience, 2002, 5(2): 124-133.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

188

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/