Cost-effectiveness analysis of subsidy schemes for industrial timber development and carbon sequestration in Japanese forest plantations

Abstract

This study uses simulations to investigate the effects of implementing two different Japanese forestry subsidy systems on timber production and carbon stock, and examines the consequences for harvesting strategies. An existing Local Yield Table Construction System (LYCS), a wood conversion algorithm, and a harvesting cost model were used in the simulations to test the applicability of different subsidies to the thinning of stands. Using forest inventory data collected by local government staff, simulation output was used to calculate forestry profits, carbon stocks, subsidies, the amount of labor required, and the cost effectiveness of investing in subsidies. By comparing the output of simulations based on two scenarios, we found that both the clear-cutting area and the amount of harvested timber were larger under Scenario 2, in which the rules governing subsidy allocations are more relaxed, than under Scenario 1, in which the rules are more restrictive. Because the harvested timber under Scenario 1 was mainly produced by clear-cutting, the forestry profits and the subsidy predicted in the early period of the simulation, were larger under Scenario 1 than under Scenario 2. In contrast, the carbon stock was larger under Scenario 2 than under Scenario 1. The simulation model is likely to be useful for improving Plan-Do-Check-Act cycles implemented in Japanese forest management systems.

References

[1] Backéus S., Wikström P., Lämås T.. A model for regional analysis of carbon sequestration and timber production. Forest Ecology and Management, 2005, 216: 28-40.

[2] Beier C.M., Lovecraft A.L., Chapin F.S.. Growth and Collapse of a Resource System: an Adaptive Cycle of Change in Public Lands Governance and Forest Management in Alaska. Ecology and Society, 2009, 14 2 5.

[3] Bolkesjø T.F., Baardsen S.. Roundwood supply in Norway: micro-level analysis of self-employed forest owners. Forest Policy and Economics, 2002, 4: 55-64.

[4] Bolte A., Ammer C., Lof M., Madsen P., Nabuurs G.J., Schall P., Spathelf P., Rock J.. Adaptive forest management in central Europe: Climate change impacts, strategies and integrative concept. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2009, 24: 473-482.

[5] Bormann B.T., Haynes R.W., Martin J.R.. Adaptive management: did some rubber hit the road?. BioScience, 2007, 57: 186-191.

[6] Bowes M.D., Krutilla J.V.. Multiple-Use Management: the Economics of Public Forestlands. Resources for the Future. 1989, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future

[7] Butler M.J., Steele L.L., Robertson R.A.. Adaptive resource management in the New England ground fish fishery: implications for public participation and impact assessment. Society & Natural Resources, 2001, 14: 791-801.

[8] Calish S., Fight R.D., Teeguarden D.E.. How Do Nontimber Values Affect Douglas-Fir Rotations?. Journal of Forestry, 1978, 76: 217-221.

[9] Campbell H.F., Jennings S.M.. Non-timber values and the optimal forest rotation: An application to the southern forest of Tasmania Source. Economic Record, 2004, 80: 387-393.

[10] Dennis D.. A probit analysis of the harvest decision using pooled time-series and cross-sectional data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1990, 18: 176-187.

[11] Eatwell J., Milgate M., Newman P.. The new Palgrave: a dictionary of economics. 1987, London: Macmillan

[12] Ehman J.L., Fan W.H., Randolph J.C., Southworth J., Welch N.T.. An integrated GIS and modeling approach for assessing the transient response of forests of the southern Great Lakes region to a doubled CO2 climate. Forest Ecology and Management, 2002, 155(1–3): 237-255.

[13] Elbakidze M, Angelstam PK, Sandstrom C, Axelsson R. 2010. Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration in Russian and Swedish Model Forest Initiatives: Adaptive Governance Toward Sustainable Forest Management? Ecology and Society, 15: [online] URL:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art14/.

[14] Environmental Ministry. Japan Verified Emissions Reduction (J-VER) system guideline. 2009, Tokyo: Environmental Ministry

[15] Foley T.G., Richter D.D., Galik C.S.. Extending rotation age for carbon sequestration: A cross-protocol comparison of North American forest offsets. Forest Ecology and Management, 2009, 259(2): 201-209.

[16] Folke C., Hahn T., Olsson P., Norberg J.. Adaptive governance of social-ecological knowledge. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2005, 30: 441-473.

[17] Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team. Forest ecosystem management: an ecological, economic, and social assessment. 1993, Washington, D.C: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, US Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and National Park Service; and Environmental Protection Agency

[18] Forestry Agency Annual Report on Trends of Forest and Forestry—Fiscal Year 2006 (in Japanese). 2007, Tokyo: Japan Forestry Association

[19] Fukuda M., Iehara T., Matsumoto M.. Carbon stock estimates for sugi and hinoki forests in Japan. Forest Ecology and Management, 2003, 184: 1-16.

[20] Galik C.S., Jackson R.B.. Risks to forest carbon offset projects in a changing climate. Forest Ecology and Management, 2009, 257(11): 2209-2216.

[21] Han K., Youn Y.-C.. The feasibility of carbon incentives to private forest management in Korea. Climatic Change, 2009, 94: 157-168.

[22] Hartman R.. The harvesting decision when a standing forest has value. Economic Inquiry, 1976, 14: 52-58.

[23] Helms JA. 1998. The dictionary of forestry. Bethesda MD. The Society of American Foresters. 210 pp.

[24] Hennigar C.R., MacLean D.A., Amos-Binks L.J.. A novel approach to optimize management strategies for carbon stored in both forests and wood products. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 256: 786-797.

[25] Hiroshima T.. Strategy for implementing silvicultural practices in Japanese plantation forests to meet a carbon sequestration goal. Journal of Forest Research, 2004, 9: 141-146.

[26] Hiroshima T., Nakajima T.. Estimation of sequestered carbon in Article-3.4 private planted forests in the first commitment period in Japan. Journal of Forest Research, 2006, 11: 427-437.

[27] Houghton J.T., Meira F. L., Lim B., Treanton K., Mamaty I., Bonduki Y., Griggs D.J., Callander B.A.. Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, reporting instructions. 1997, Bracknell: IPCC/OECD/IEA

[28] Im E.H., Adams D.M., Latta G.S.. Potential impacts of carbon taxes on carbon flux in western Oregon private forests. Forest Policy and Economics, 2007, 9(8): 1006-1017.

[29] IPCC. Land Use, Land-use Change and Forestry. Special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2000, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[30] IPCC. Metz B., Davidson O.R., Bosch P.R., Dave R., Meyer L.A.. Climate Change 2007. Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[31] Kaipainen T., Liski J., Pussinen A., Karjalainen T.. Managing carbon sinks by changing rotation length in European forests. Environmental Science & Policy, 2004, 7(3): 205-219.

[32] Kalibo H.W., Medley K.E.. Participatory resource mapping for adaptive collaborative management at Mt. Kasigau, Kenya. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, 82: 145-158.

[33] Komaki T.. The future forestry policy for private stands. The Forestry Economic Rresearch, 2006, 52: 1-9.

[34] Kurttila M., Pykalainen J., Leskinen P.. Defining the forest landowner’s utility-loss compensative subsidy level for a biodiversity object. European Journal of Forest Research, 2006, 125: 67-78.

[35] Lewis D.J., Plantinga A.J.. Policies for habitat fragmentation: combining econometrics with GIS-based landscape simulations. Land Economics, 2007, 83: 109-127.

[36] McKenney D.W., Yemshanov D., Fox G., Ramlal E.. Cost estimates for carbon sequestration from fast growing popular plantation in Canada. Forest Policy and Economics, 2004, 6: 345-358.

[37] Menzies N.K.. Three hundred years of Taunt, a: A sustainable system of forestry in South China. Human Ecology, 1988, 16: 361-376.

[38] Miles E.J.. The SSC cycle: a PDCA approach to address site-specific characteristics in a continuous shallow water quality monitoring project. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 2008, 10: 604-611.

[39] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Board. Millennium ecosystem assessment: ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. 2005, Washington: Island Press

[40] Miyazaki Prefecture Government. Miyazaki forestry statistical data. 2008, Miyazaki: Miyazaki Prefecture

[41] Miyazaki Prefecture Government. 2008. The silviculture system for planted forest area, Miyazaki.

[42] Nakajima T., Hiroshima T., Shiraishi N.. An analysis of managed private forest focusing on the expansion of lands under the article 3.4 of the Kyoto Protocol. Journal of Japanese Forestry Society, 2007, 89: 167-173.

[43] Nakajima T., Hiroshima T., Shiraishi N.. An analysis about local silvicultural practices and subsidy system in a region level. Journal of Forest Planning, 2007, 41(2): 179-186.

[44] Nakajima T., Kanomata H., Matsumoto M., Tatsuhara S., Shiraishi N.. The application of “Wood Max” for total optimization of forestry profits based on joint implementation silvicultural practices. Kyushu Journal of Forest Research, 2009, 62: 176-180.

[45] Nakajima T., Matsumoto M., Tatsuhara S.. Development and application of an algorithm to estimate and maximize stumpage price based on timber market and stand conditions. Journal of Forest Planning, 2009, 15: 21-27.

[46] Nakajima T., Owari T., Matsumoto M., Lee J.S., Tatsuhara S., Shiraishi N.. Risk assessment of spatiotemporal wind hazards in Japanese mountain forests. Hokkaido Branch Japanese Forest Society, 2009, 57: 97-99.

[47] Nakajima T., Matsumoto M., Sasakawa H., Ishibashi S., Tatsuhara S.. Estimation of growth parameters within the Local Yield table Construction System for planted forests throughout Japan. Journal of Forest Planning, 2010, 15: 99-108.

[48] Nakajima T, Hiroshima T, Noda H, Matsumoto M, Kanomata H. in press. Development of a simulation system for regional forest management using forestry and economic models. Kanto Journal of Forest Research

[49] Nakajima T, Matsumoto M, Shiraishi N. in press. Modeling diameter growth and self-thinning in planted Sugi (Cryptomeria japonica) stands. The Open Forest Science Journal.

[50] Nyberg B.. An introductory guide to adaptive management for project leaders and participants. 1999, Victoria: B.C. Forest Service

[51] Ohmura K., Sawada H., Oohata S.. Growth records on the artificial forest permanent plots in the Tokyo University Forest in Chichibu. Miscellaneous Information, Tokyo University Forests, 2004, 43: 1-192.

[52] Pohjola J., Valsta L.. Carbon credits and management of Scots pine and Norway spruce stands in Finland. Forest Policy and Economics, 2007, 9: 789-798.

[53] Pattanayak S.K., Murray B.C., Abt R.. How joint in joint forest production: an econometric analysis of timber supply conditional on endogenous amenity values. Forest Science, 2002, 48(3): 479-491.

[54] Pukkala T.. Multi-objective forest planning. 2002, Boston: Kluwer Academic

[55] Raison R.J.. Richardson J., Bjorheden R., Hakkila P., Lowe A.T., Smith C.T.. Environmental Sustainability. Bioenergy from Sustainable Forestry: Guiding Principles and Practice. 2002, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 159 164

[56] Raymer A., Gobakken T., Solberg B., Hoen H., Bergseng E.. A forest optimisation model including carbon flows: Application to a forest in Norway. Forest Ecology and Management, 2009, 258: 579-589.

[57] Ravindranath N.H., Somashekhar B.S.. Potential and economics of forestry options for carbon sequestration in India. Biomass & Bioenergy, 1995, 8(5): 323-336.

[58] Royer J.. Determinants of reforestation behavior among southern landowners. Forest Science, 1987, 33(3): 654-667.

[59] Sakata K.. Carbon dioxide price from which an afforestation interest rate becomes maximum in each cutting age: loblolly pine in southeast Georgia, USA. Journal of Forest Research, 2005, 10(5): 385-390.

[60] Science Council. The policy to progress research development of global environmental science technology. 2008, Tokyo: Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

[61] Seidl R., Rammer W., Jager D., Currie W.S., Lexer M.J.. Assessing trade-offs between carbon sequestration and timber production within a framework of multi-purpose forestry in Austria. Forest Ecology and Management, 2007, 248(1–2): 64-79.

[62] Shindler B.A., Beckley T.M., Finley M.C.. Two paths toward sustainable forests. Public values in Canada and the United States. 2003, Corvallis, Oregon, USA: Oregon State University Press

[63] Shiraishi N.. Study on the growth prediction of even-aged stands. Bulletin of Tokyo University Forest, 1986, 75: 199-256.

[64] Sivrikaya F., Keles S., Cakir G.. Spatial distribution and temporal change of carbon storage in timber biomass of two different forest management units. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2007, 132(1–3): 429-438.

[65] Song Y., Wang G., Burch W.R., Rechlin M.A.. From innovation to adaptation: lessons from 20 years of the SHIFT forest management system in Sanming, China. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004, 191: 225-238.

[66] Stankey GH, Clark RN, Bormann BT. 2005. Adaptive Management of Natural Resources: Theory, Concepts, and Management Institutions. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Portland, pp73.

[67] Thompson M.P., Adams D., Sessions J.. Radiative forcing and the optimal rotation age. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68(10): 2713-2720.

[68] Tokyo Stock Exchange. 2007. Annual statistics of stock exchange. CD-ROM. Tokyo Stock Exchange. Tokyo.

[69] UNFCCC. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its third session, held at Kyoto, from 1 to 11 December 1997. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its third session. 1998, Geneva: United Nations Office at Geneva

[70] UNFCCC. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its seventh session, held at Marrakesh from 29 October to 10 November 2001. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties. Volume I. 2002, Geneva: United Nations Office at Geneva

[71] van Kooten G.C., Binkley C.S., Delcourt G.. Effect of carbon taxes and subsidies on optimal forest rotation age and supply of carbon services. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1995, 77: 365-374.

[72] Winton J.R.. A dictionary of economic terms: for the use of newspaper readers and students. 1951, London: Routledge & K. Paul

[73] Zhang D., Pearse P.. The influence of the form of tenure on reforestation in British Columbia. Forest Ecology and Management, 1997, 98: 239-250.