Variations in bark thickness and sapwood density of Calophyllum inophyllum provenances in Australia and in Sri Lanka

Abstract

Sapwood density and bark thickness of Calophyllum inophyllum L. (a multipurpose durable timber species) were studied in various locations in Northern Australia and in Sri Lanka. Measurements were taken non-destructively by using core sampling and bark gauge. From each provenance, 4–15 mature trees having girth at breast height over bark (GBHOB) at 100–150 cm were selected on the basis of the population size. Significant (p<0.05) hemispheric and provenance variations in bark thickness were found. Variations in the bark thickness are influenced by environmental variables. Variations in sapwood density were less pronounced compared to that of bark thickness. Variations in sapwood density are likely to be governed by genotypic variations.

Keywords

bark thickness / Calophyllum inophyllum / provenance variations / sapwood density

References

[1] Bergin D.O., Kimberley M.O., Low C.B.. Provenance variation in Podocarpus totara (D. Don): Growth, tree form and wood density on a coastal site in the north of the natural range, New Zealand. Forest Ecology and Management, 2007, 255: 1367-1378.

[2] Chave J., Muller-Landau H.C., Baker T.R., Easdale T.A., Steege H.T., Webb C.O.. Regional and phylogenetic variation of wood density across 2456 Neotropical tree species. Ecological Applications, 2006, 16: 2356-2367.

[3] Chave J.. Measuring wood density for tropical forest trees field manual. 2006, 31000 Toulouse, France: Lab. Evolution et Diversité Biologique Université Paul Sabatier

[4] Dweck A.C., Meadows T.. Tamunu (Calophyllum inophyllum)-the African, Asian, Polynesian and Pacific Panacea. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 2002, 24: 1-8.

[5] Friday J.B., Okano D.. Calophyllum inophyllum (kamani) Species Profiles for Pacific Island Agroforestry. 2006, Hawaii: Traditional Tree Initiative

[6] Hathurusingha HMSD, Ashwath N. 2007. Beauty Leaf, a Tree with Great Economic Potential, 12th International Forestry Symposium. Kalutara, Sri Lanka, 12p.

[7] Hedge V., Chandran M.D.S., Gadgil M.. Variation in bark thickness in a tropical forest community of Western Ghats in India. Functional Ecology, 1998, 12: 313-318.

[8] ISO 10390. Soil Quality — Determination of pH. 1994, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization. Geneva

[9] ISO 10694. Soil Quality — Determination of organic and total carbon after dry combustion (elementary analysis). 1995, Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.

[10] ISO 11047. Soil Quality — Flame and electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometric methods. 1998, Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.

[11] ISO 13878. Soil Quality — Determination of total nitrogen content by dry combustion (“elemental analysis”). 1998, Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.

[12] Lemmens R.H.M.J.. Louppe D.. Calophyllum inophyllum L. Prota 7: Timbers/Bois d’oeuvre. [CD-Rom]. 2005, Wageningen, Netherlands: PROTA

[13] Little E.L., Skolmen R.G.. Common forest trees of Hawaii (native and introduced). 1989, Washington: USDA Agriculture Handbook 679

[14] Maiden J.H.. The Useful Plants of Australia. 1975, Melbourne, Australia: Compendium Pty Ltd.

[15] Masataka I., Chihiro I., Hugh T.W.T., Masashi K., Harukuni T., Hoyoku N., Hiroshi F.. Cancer chemopreventive agents, 4-phenylcoumarins from Calophyllum inophyllum. Cancer Letters, 2001, 169: 15-19.

[16] Moser G., Röderstein M., Soethe N., Hertel D., Leuschner C.. Altitudinal changes in stand structure and biomass allocation of tropical mountain forests in relation to microclimate and soil chemistry. Ecological Studies, 2008, 198: 229-242.

[17] MTC wood wizard, an online database; http://woodwizard.mtc.com.my:8888/ (accessed 17/08/2006).

[18] Slik J.W.F., Aiba S.I., Brearley F.Q., Cannon C.H., Forshed O., et al. Environmental correlates of tree biomass, basal area, wood specific gravity and stem density gradients in Borneo’s tropical forests. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2010, 19(1): 50-60.

[19] Stahl E.G.. Changes in wood and stem properties of Pinus sylvestris caused by provenance transfer. Silva Fennica, 1998, 32(2): 163-172.

[20] Timber species notes index, Hardwoods advice. 2007. Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries. Queensland, Australia.

[21] Warrall J.. Provenance and clonal variation in phenology and wood properties of Norway spruce. 1974, USA: Faculty of the Graduate School, Yale University

[22] Wright J.A.. Provenance variation in wood characteristics of Pinus caribaea Morelet and Pinus oocarpa Schiede. 1987, England: University of Oxford