Land-use, biomass and carbon estimation in dry tropical forest of Chhattisgarh region in India using satellite remote sensing and GIS

Arvind Bijalwan , S. L. Swamy , Chandra Mohan Sharma , Neeraj Kumar Sharma , A. K. Tiwari

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2010, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2) : 161 -170.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2010, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2) : 161 -170. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-010-0026-y
Research Paper

Land-use, biomass and carbon estimation in dry tropical forest of Chhattisgarh region in India using satellite remote sensing and GIS

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

A study was conducted to characterize the land use, biomass and carbon status of dry tropical forest in Raipur district of Chhattisgarh, India using satellite remote sensing data and GIS techniques in the year of 2001–2002. The main forest types observed in the area are Teak forest, mixed forest, degraded forest and Sal mixed forest. The aspect and slope of the sites influenced the forest vegetation types, biomass and carbon storage in the different forests. The standing volume, above ground biomass and carbon storage varied from 35.59 to 64.31 m3·ha−1, 45.94 to 78.31 Mg·ha−1, and 22.97 to 33.27 Mg·ha−1, respectively among different forest types. The highest volumes, above ground biomass and carbon storage per hectare were found in the mixed forest and lowest in the degraded forest. The total standing carbon present in the entire study area was 78170.72 Mg in mixed forest, 81656.91 Mg in Teak forest, 7833.23 Mg in degraded forest and 7470.45 Mg in Sal mixed forest, respectively. The study shows that dry tropical forests of the studied area in Chhattisgarh are in growing stage and have strong potential for carbon sequestration.

Keywords

biomass / carbon storage / aspect / slope

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Arvind Bijalwan, S. L. Swamy, Chandra Mohan Sharma, Neeraj Kumar Sharma, A. K. Tiwari. Land-use, biomass and carbon estimation in dry tropical forest of Chhattisgarh region in India using satellite remote sensing and GIS. Journal of Forestry Research, 2010, 21(2): 161-170 DOI:10.1007/s11676-010-0026-y

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ajtay G.L., Ketner P., Duvignead P.. Bolin B., Degrens E.T., Kemps S., Ketmer P.. Terrestrial primary production and phytomass. SCOPE 13. The global carbon cycle. 1979, New York, U.S.A.: J. Wiley and sons, 129 182

[2]

Brown S., Gillespie A.J.R., Lugo A.E.. Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with application to forest inventory data. Forest Science, 1989, 35: 881-902.

[3]

Brown S., Lugo A.E.. The storage and production of organic of matter in tropical forests and their role in global carbon cycle. Biotropica, 1982, 14: 161-187.

[4]

Brown S, Therson LR, Lugo AE. 1994. Land use and biomass changes of forests in peninsular Malaysia from 1972 to 1982: A GIS approach. Springes-verlag Jue. U.S. America.

[5]

Cook E.A., Jverson L.R., Graham R.L.. Estimating forest productivity with Thematic Mapper and bio geographical data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1989, 28: 131-141.

[6]

Dhanai C.S., Panwar V.P.. Role of aspect and soil on the structure and composition of Quercus floribunds natural stands in Garhwal Himalaya. Indian Forester, 1999, 125(12): 1204-1213.

[7]

Dixon R.K., Brown S., Houghton R.A., Solomon A.M., Trexler M.C., Wisnie, Wski J.. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science, 1994, 263: 185-190.

[8]

Dutt CBS, Jha CS, Rao DBB. 1994. Carrying capacity of grasslands of Srishilam tiger reserve — Nagarjunasagar, Andhra Pradesh. Technical Report Submitted in NRSA.

[9]

Foddy G.M., Paulbinskas G., Lucas R.M., Curran P.J., Honzak M.. Identifying terrestrial carbon sinks: classification of successional stages in regenerating tropical forest from landsat TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1996, 55: 205-216.

[10]

FSI. Volume equations for forest of India, Nepal and Bhutan. 1996, Dehradun: Forest Survey of India, 249.

[11]

Ghotz H.L.. Environmental limits on above ground Net Primary Production, leaf area and biomass in vegetation zones of the Pacific North-West. Ecology, 1982, 63: 469-481.

[12]

Hall C.A.S., Uhlig J.. Refining estimates of carbon released from tropical land use change. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1991, 21: 118-131.

[13]

Haripriya G.S.. Estimates of biomass in Indian forests. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2000, 19(250): 245-258.

[14]

Heath LS. 2007. Methodology for Estimating Net Carbon Stock Changes in Forest Lands Remaining Forest Lands. In: Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2005. Unpublished methods documentation on file at the Northern FIA Program, Durham, New Hampshire scheduled for publication by the EPA.

[15]

Houghton R.A.. Tropical deforestation and atmospheric carbon dioxide. Climatic change, 1991, 19: 99-118.

[16]

Hougton R.A., Unruh J.D., Lefebure P.A.. Current land cover in the tropics and its potential for sequestering carbon. Global biogeochemical cycles, 1993, 7(2): 305-320.

[17]

Jayakumar S., Arockiasamy D.I., Britto J.S.. Estimates of current status of Forest types in Kolli Hill using Remote Sensing. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2000, 28(243): 141-151.

[18]

Kachhawaha T.S.. Temporal and multisensar approach in forest/ vegetation mapping and their identification for effective management of Rajaji National park Uttar Pradesh, India. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1993, 14(17): 3105-3114.

[19]

Krishna N.D.R., Maji A.K., Krishna Murthy Y.U.N., Rao B.S.P.. Remote Sensing and geographical information system for canopy cover mapping. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2001, 29(3): 107-113.

[20]

Mahajan S., Panwar P., Kaundal D.. GIS application to determine the effect of topography on landuse in Ashwani khad watershed. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2001, 29(4): 243-248.

[21]

Murphy P.G., Lugo A.E.. Structure and biomass of a subtropical dry forest in Puerto Rico. Biotropica, 1986, 18: 89-96.

[22]

Ravan S.A., Roy P.S., Sharma C.M.. Accuracy evaluation of digital classification of Landsat TM data — An approach to include phenological stages of tropical dry deciduous forest. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 1996, 22: 33-43.

[23]

Ravan S.A.. Ecological analysis of vegetation from satellite remote sensing at Madhav National Park Sivapuri (M.P.). 1994, Srinagar, India: HNB Garhwal University

[24]

Ravindranath N.H., Hall D.O.. Indian forest conservation and tropical deforestation. Ambio, 1994, 23(8): 521-423.

[25]

Roy P.S., Ravan S.A.. Biomass estimation using satellite remote sensing data — An investigation on possible approaches for natural forest. Journal of Biosciecces, 1996, 21(4): 535-561.

[26]

Running S.W., Peterson D.L., Spanner M.A., Tember K.B.. Remote Sensing of coniferous forest leaf area. Ecology, 1986, 67: 273-276.

[27]

Saha S.K., Kudart M., Bhan S.K.. Digital processing of Landsat TM data watershed mapping in parts of Aligarh district (Uttar Pradesh), India. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1990, 11(3): 485-492.

[28]

Saxena K.G., Tiwari A.K., Porwal M.C., Menon A.R.R.. Vegetation maps, mapping needs and scope of digital processing of Landsat Thematic Mapper data in tropical region of South-West India. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1992, 13(11): 2017-2037.

[29]

Schroeder P.. Carbon storage potential of short rotation tropical tree plantations. Forest Ecology and Management, 1992, 50: 31-41.

[30]

Sehgal V.K., Dubey R.P.. Evaluation of potential usefulness of IRS-1C WIFS simulated data for dryland rabi sorghum crop discrimination. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 1997, 25(3): 137-143.

[31]

Sharma C.M., Baduni N.P.. Structural attributes and growing stock variations on different aspects of high Himalayan and Siwalik chirpine forests. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 2000, 12(3): 482-492.

[32]

Shepherd D., Montagnini F.. Above ground carbon sequestration potential in mixed and pure tree plantations in the humid tropics. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 2001, 13(3): 450-459.

[33]

Shi H., Singh A.. An assessment of biodiversity hotspots using Remote Sensing and GIS. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2002, 30(1&2): 105-112.

[34]

Singh K.P., Mishra R.. Structure and functioning of natural modified and silvicultural ecosystems of eastern Uttar Pradish. 1979, India: MAB research project-Banaras Hindu university

[35]

Singh L., Singh J.S.. Species structure, dry matter dynamics and carbon flux of a dry tropical forest in India. Annals of Botany, 1991, 68: 263-273.

[36]

Smith D.M., Larson B.C., Kelly M.J., Ashton P.M.S.. The Practice of Silviculture, 1997 9th Edition New York: John Wiley and Sons

[37]

Smith J.E., Heath L.S., Nichols M.C.. U.S. forest carbon calculation tool: forest-land carbon stocks and net annual stock change. 2007, Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 28.

[38]

Smith J.E., Heath L.S.. A model of forest floor carbon mass for United States forest types. 2002, Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, 37.

[39]

Spanner M.A., Pierce I.L., Peterson D.L., Running S.W.. Remote sensing of temperate coniferous forest leaf area index: the influence of canopy closer understorey vegetation back ground reflectance. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1990, 11: 195-211.

[40]

Sudhakar S., Das R.K., Chakraborty D., Bardhan Roy B.K., Raha A.K., Shukla P.. Stratification approach for forest cover type and landuse mapping using IRS-1A LISS-II data — A case study. Journal of the Indian society of Remote Sensing, 1994, 22(1): 21-29.

[41]

Sugumaran R., Sandhya G., Rao K.S., Javed R.N., Kimothi M.M.. Delineation of social forestry plantation under various afforestation programme using satellite digital data. Journal of the Indian society of Remote Sensing, 1994, 22(4): 245-249.

[42]

Swamy S.L.. Estimation of Net Primary Productivity (NPP) in an Indian tropical evergreen forest using Remote Sensing data. 1998, Hyderabad, India: Jawaharlal Nehru Technology University

[43]

Thomas W., Brakk A., William P., Wergin F., Erbe, Joann M.. Seasonal variation in the structure and red reflectance of leaves from yellow poplar, Red oak and Red maple. Remote Sensing Environment, 1993, 43(2): 115-130.

[44]

Tiwari A.K.. Mapping forest biomass through digital processing of IRS-1A data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1994, 15(9): 1849-1866.

[45]

Townshed J.R.G., Justice C.O., Kalb V.. Characterization and classification of South American land cover types using Satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1987, 8: 1189-1207.

[46]

Tuomisto H., Linna A., Kalliola R.. Use of digitally processed satellite images in studies of tropical rain forest vegetation. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1994, 15(8): 1595-1610.

[47]

Unni N.U.M., Murthy M.S.R., Swamy S.L., Dutt C.B.S.. Fuelwood sustainability in rural areas — A model study using Satellite Remote Sensing data. 1992, India: Technical Report Submitted in NRSA Hyderabad

[48]

Waring R.H., Schleisinger W.H.. Forest Ecosystems Concepts and Management. 1985, New York: Academic Press

[49]

William D.L., Nelson R.F.. Use of remotely sensed data for assessing forest stand conditions in eastern United States. IEEE transactions on biosciences and Remote Sensing GE, 1986, 24: 130-138.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

162

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/