A comparative assessment on regeneration status of indigenous woody plants in Eucalyptus grandis plantation and adjacent natural forest

Shiferaw Alem , Tadesse Woldemariam

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2009, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1) : 31 -36.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2009, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1) : 31 -36. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-009-0006-2
Research Paper

A comparative assessment on regeneration status of indigenous woody plants in Eucalyptus grandis plantation and adjacent natural forest

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Diversity, density and species composition of naturally regenerated woody plants under Eucalyptus grandis plantation and the adjacent natural forest were investigated and compared. Twenty plots, with an area of 20 m × 20 m for each, were established in both of E. grandis plantation and adjacent natural forest, independently. In each plot, species name, abundance, diameter and height were recorded. Numbers of seedling were collected in five sub-plots (4 m2) within each major plot. A total of 46 species in the plantation, and 52 species in the natural forest, which belongs to 36 families were recorded. The diversity of species (H′) is 2.19 in the plantation and 2.74 in the natural forest. The density of understory woody plant was 3842 stems/ha in the plantation and 4122 stems/ha in the natural forest. The densities of seedlings in the natural forest and the plantation were 8101 stems/ha and 4151 stems/ha, respectively. High similarity of woody species composition was found between the natural forest and the plantation. The E. grandis plantation was found favoring the regeneration and growth of Millitia ferruginia and Coffea arabica in a much better way than other underneath woody species.

Keywords

E. grandis / natural forest / natural regeneration / plantation / woody species diversity

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Shiferaw Alem, Tadesse Woldemariam. A comparative assessment on regeneration status of indigenous woody plants in Eucalyptus grandis plantation and adjacent natural forest. Journal of Forestry Research, 2009, 20(1): 31-36 DOI:10.1007/s11676-009-0006-2

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Carnus JM, Parrotta J, Brockerhoff EG, Arbez M, Jactel H, Kremer A, Lamb D, Hara KO, Walters B. 2003. Planted forests and biodiversity: UNFF inter-sessional experts meeting on the role of planted forests in sustainable forest management. New Zealand. 54 pp.

[2]

Christian D.P., Hoffman W., Hanowski J.M., Niemi G.J., Beyea J.. Bird and mammal diversity on woody biomass plantations in North America. Biomass and Bioenergy, 1998, 14: 395-402.

[3]

Davis A.J., Huijbregts H., Krikken J.. The role of local and regional processes in shaping dung beetle communities in tropical forest plantations in Borneo. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2001, 9(4): 281-292.

[4]

EMA National Atlas of Ethiopia. 1998, Ethiopia: Addis Ababa

[5]

Eshetu Y.. Diversity of naturally regenerated native woody species in forest plantations in the Ethiopian highlands. New Forests, 2001, 22: 159-177.

[6]

Eshetu Y., Olavi L.. Indigenous woody species diversity in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. ssp. globulus plantations in the Ethiopian highlands. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2003, 12(3): 567-582.

[7]

Evans J.. Plantation forestry in the tropics, 1992 2 New York: Oxford University Press

[8]

FAO. State of the world’s forests. 2001, Rome: FAO

[9]

Feyera S., Demel T.. Regeneration of indigenous woody species under the canopy of tree plantations in central Ethiopia. Tropical Ecology, 2001, 42: 175-185.

[10]

Feyera S., Demel T., Bertake N.. Native woody species regeneration in exotic tree plantations at Munessa-Shashemene forest, Southern Ethiopia. New Forests, 2002, 24: 131-145.

[11]

Fosberg F.R.. A classification of vegetation for general purposes. Tropical Ecology, 1961, 2: 1-28.

[12]

Jagger P., Pender J.. The role of trees for sustainable management of less favored lands: the case of eucalypts in Ethiopia. 2000, Washington: International Food Research Institute

[13]

Kent M., Coker P.. Vegetation description and analysis: a practical approach. 1994, England: John Wiley and Sons

[14]

Krebs C.J.. Ecological methodology. 1989, New York: Harper and Row Cop.

[15]

Loumeto J., Huttel C.. Understory vegetation in fast growing tree plantations on savanna soils in Congo. Forest Ecology and Management, 1997, 99: 65-81.

[16]

Lugo A.E.. Wali M.K.. Tree plantation for rehabilitating damaged lands in the tropics. Environmental Rehabilitation. 1992, Hague: SPB Academic Publishing, 247 255

[17]

Michelsen A., Lisanework N., Friis I., Holst N.. Comparisons of understory vegetation and soil fertility in plantations and adjacent natural forests in the Ethiopian highlands. Applied Ecology, 1996, 33: 627-642.

[18]

Mulugeta L., Demel T.. Restoration of native forest flora in the degraded high lands of Ethiopia: constraints and opportunities. Ethiopian Journal of Science, 2004, 27: 75-90.

[19]

Mulugeta L., Taye G., Demel T.. Effects of canopy cover and understory environment of tree plantations on species richness, density and sizes of colonizing woody species in Southern Ethiopia. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004, 194: 1-10.

[20]

Norton D.A.. Indigenous biodiversity conservation and plantation forestry: options for the future. New Zealand Forest, 1998, 43: 34-39.

[21]

Parrotta J.A., Turnbull W.J., Jones N.. Catalysing native forest regeneration on degraded tropical lands. Forest Ecology and Management, 1997, 99: 1-7.

[22]

Powers J.S., Haggar J.P., Fisher R.F.. The effect of overstory composition on understory woody regeneration and species richness in 7- year-old plantations in Costa Rica. Forest Ecology and Management, 1997, 99: 43-54.

[23]

SAS. SAS System Softtware, Version 9.1. 2003, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc. Cary

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

143

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/