Analysis of synonymous codon usage in chloroplast genome of Populus alba

Abstract

The pattern of codon usage in the chloroplast genome of Populus alba was investigated. Correspondence analysis (a commonly used multivariate statistical approach) and method of effective number of codons (ENc)-plot were conducted to analyze synonymous codon usage. The results of correspondence analysis showed that the distribution of genes on the major axis was significantly correlated with the frequency of use of G+C in synonymously variable third position of sense codon (GC_3S), (r=0.349), and the positions of genes on the axis 2 and axis 3 were significantly correlated with CAI (r=−0.348, p<0.01 and r=0.602, p<0.01). The ENc for most genes was similar to that for the expected ENc based on the GC_3S, but several genes with low ENC values were lying below the expected curve. All of these data indicated that codon usage was dominated by a mutational bias in chloroplast genome of P. alba. The selection in nature for translational efficiency only played a minor role in shaping codon usage in the chloroplast genome of P. alba.

Keywords

codon usage / chloroplast / GC content / Populus alba

References

[1] Akashi H. Gene expression and molecular evolution Curr Opin Genet Dev, 2001, 11: 660-666.

[2] Bernardi G. Compositional constraints and genome evolution J Mol Evol, 1986, 24: 1-11.

[3] Bernardi G. The vertebrate genome — isochores and evolution Mo Biol Evol, 1993, 10: 186-204.

[4] Bonitz S.G., Berlani R., Coruzzi G., Li M., Macino G. Codon recognition rules in yeast mitochondria Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A., 1980, 77(6): 3167-3170.

[5] Duret L. Evolution of synonymous codon usage in metazoans Curr Opin Genet. Dev., 2002, 12: 640-649.

[6] Grantham R., Gautier C., Gouy M., Mercier R., Pave A. Codon catalogue usage and the genome hypothesis Nucleic Acids Res, 1980, 8: r49-r62.

[7] Hallick R.B., Bairoch A. Proposals for the naming of chloroplast genes. III. Nomenclature for open reading frames encoded in chloroplast genomes Plant Mol Biol Reptr, 1994, 12: S29-30.

[8] Ikemura T. Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms Mol Biol Evol, 1985, 2: 13-34.

[9] Kawabe A., Miyashita N.T. Patterns of codon usage bias in three dicot and four monocot plant species Genes Genet. Syst, 2003, 8: 343-352.

[10] Klein R.R., Mullet J.E. Regulation of chloroplast-encoded chlorophyll-binding protein translation during higher plant chloroplast biogenesis J. Biol. Chem., 1986, 26(1): 11138-11145.

[11] Lockhart P.J., Penny D., Hendy M.D., Howe C.J., Beanland T.J., Larkum A.W.D. Controversy on chloroplast origins FEBS Lett., 1992, 301: 127-131.

[12] Lu H., Zha W.M., Zheng Y. et al. Analysis of synonymous codon usage bias in Chlamydia Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinic, 2005, 37(1): 1-10.

[13] Morton B.R. Chloroplast DNA codon use: evidence for selection at the psbA locus based on tRNA availability J Mol Evol, 1993, 37: 273-280.

[14] Morton B.R. Selection on the codon bias of chloroplast and cyanelle Genes in Different Plant and Algal Lineages J Mol Evol, 1998, 46: 449-459.

[15] Morton B.R. Strand asymmetry and codon usage bias in the chloroplast genome of Euglena gracilis Proc Natl Acad. Sci USA, 1999, 96(9): 5123-5128.

[16] Morton BR The role of context-dependent mutations in generating compositional and codon usage bias in grass chloroplast DNA J Mol Evol, 2003, 56(5): 616-29.

[17] Morton B.R., Levin J.A. The atypical codon usage of the psbA gene may be the remnant of an ancestral bias Proc Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 1997, 94: 11434-11438.

[18] Morton B.R., So B.G. Codon usage in plastid genes is correlated with context, position within the gene, and amino acid content J Mol Evol, 2000, 50: 184-193.

[19] Mullet J.E., Klein R.R. Transcription and RNA stability are important determinants of higher plant chloroplast RNA levels EMBO J, 1987, 6: 1571-1579.

[20] Nussinov R. Strong doublet preferences in nucleotide sequences and DNA geometry J Mol Evol, 1984, 20: 111-119.

[21] Perriere G., Thioulouse J. Use and misuse of correspondence analysis in codon usgae studies Nucleic Acids Res, 2002, 30: 4548-4555.

[22] Pfitzinger H., Guillemaut P., Weil J.H., Pillay D.T.N. Adjustment of the tRNA population to the codon usage of chloroplasts Nucleic Acids Res, 1987, 15: 137

[23] Sharp P.M., Cowe E., Higgins D.G., Shields D.C., Wolfe K.H., Wright F. Codon usage in Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens; a review of the considerable within-species diversity Nucleic Acids Res, 1988, 16: 8207-8711.

[24] Sharp P.M., Devine K.M. Codon usage and gene-expression level in Dictyostelium discoideum — highly expressed genes do prefer optimal codons Nucleic Acids Res., 1989, 17: 5029-5039.

[25] Sharp P.M., Li W.H. The codon adaptation index—A measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications Nucleic Acids Res, 1987, 15(3): 1281-1295.

[26] Sharp P.M., Tuohy T.M.F., Mosurski K.R. Codon usage in yeast cluster-analysis clearly differentiates highly and lowly expressed genes Nucleic Acids Res, 1986, 14: 5125-5143.

[27] Shields D.C., Sharp P.M. Synonymous codon usage in Bacillus subtilis reflects both translational selection and mutational biases Nucleic Acids Res, 1987, 15: 8023-8040.

[28] Sueoka N. On the genetic basis of variation and heterogeneity of DNA base composition Proc. Natl Acad Sci USA, 1962, 48: 582-592.

[29] Sueoka N. Directional mutational pressure and neutral pressure Proc. Natl Acad Sci USA, 1988, 85: 2653-2657.

[30] Wang H.C., Hickey D.A. Rapid divergence of codon usage patterns within the rice genome BMC Evol Bio, 2007, 7 Supp1 S6

[31] Wolfe K.H., Morden C.W., EMS S.C., Palmer J.D. Rapid evolution of the plastid translational apparatus in a nonphotosynthetic plant: loss or accelerated sequence evolution of tRNA and ribosomal protein genes J Mol Evol, 1992, 35: 304-317.

[32] Wolfe K.H., Sharp P.M. Identification of functional open reading frames in chloroplast genomes Gene, 1988, 66: 215-222.

[33] Wolfe K.H., Sharp P.M., Li W.H. Mutation-rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome Nature, 1989, 337: 283-285.

[34] Wright F. The ‘effective number of codons’ used in a gene Gene, 1990, 87(1): 23-29.