Forestry ecological footprint in China during 1973–2003

Xiao-fei Hu , Li-min Dai , Hui-yan Gu , Xiao-bo Xiong

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2006, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (2) : 87 -92.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2006, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (2) : 87 -92. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-006-0021-5
Article

Forestry ecological footprint in China during 1973–2003

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The ecological footprint (EF) model has received much attention as an assessment indicator for sustainable development in recent years. Firstly, the temporal changes of domestic timber production, imports and exports in China were analyzed from 1973 to 2003, the analysis results showed an apparent fluctuation in timber production during 1973–1995 but a decreasing trend during 1995–2002, an increasing trend in timber imports since 1995 especially after the implementation of the Natural Forest Protection Project (NFPP), an decreasing trend year by year in timber exports since 1995. Secondly, this paper presented a time series analysis of actual forest area demand in the sustainable yield and production approach in China from 1973 to 2003, which includes both import and export forest area demand. The results showed the actual forest area demand simulated from the sustainable yield approach was slightly higher than that from the production approach during 1978–1988 and a little lower during 1989–2003; however, the actual forest area demands simulated by these two model approaches were larger than calculations that expressed in conventional forest EF. Meanwhile, the results indicated the forestry development in China during 1978–1988 was unsustainable due to overexploitation of forest stocking volumes, and China’s forestry moved toward sustainable development since 1989 because forest resources are exploited at lower rates than they are regenerated. However, compared to forestry developed countries, the forestry development capacity in China is still lower. Finally, based on the model results we analyzed the relationships between forestry EF and the key policies, including trade policy, economic policy and forest conservation programs. In addition, several suggestions about reducing forestry EF and enhancing sustainable forestry development in China are given.

Keywords

Ecological footprint / Actual area demand / Sustainable forestry / China

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiao-fei Hu, Li-min Dai, Hui-yan Gu, Xiao-bo Xiong. Forestry ecological footprint in China during 1973–2003. Journal of Forestry Research, 2006, 17(2): 87-92 DOI:10.1007/s11676-006-0021-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Erb K.H. Actual land demand of Austria 1926–2000: a variation on ecological footprint assessments [J]. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21(3): 247-259.

[2]

Feng G., Zhang L., Cui P. Wood aggregation demand and supply and market structure in China [J]. Forestry Economics, 1999, 5: 61-74.

[3]

Ferguson A.R.B. The logical foundations of ecological footprints [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1999, 1(2): 149-156.

[4]

Ferng J.-J. Using composition of land multiplier to estimate ecological footprints associated with production activity [J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 37(2): 159-172.

[5]

FAO. State of the world’s forests 2003 [M], 2003 Rome: FAO. Forestry Department 132-135.

[6]

Haberl H., Erb K., Krausmann F. How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: the case of Austria 1926–1995 [J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 38(1): 25-45.

[7]

Hanley N., Moffatt I., Faichney R. et al. Measuring sustainability: A time series of alternative indicators for Scotland [J]. Ecological Economic, 1999, 28(1): 55-73.

[8]

Hunter C. Sustainable tourism and the touristic ecological footprint [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2002, 4: 7-20.

[9]

Jiang Z. Modern forestry of China [M], 2000 Beijing: China’s Forestry Publishing House 5-65.

[10]

Li W. Degradation and restoration of forest ecosystems in china [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004, 201: 33-41.

[11]

Lin F. Product, consumption and trade and its development trends of timber and main forest products in China in 2010 [J]. Forest Science and Technology, 1999, 6: 3-6.

[12]

Ministry of Forestry. China Forest Resources Inventory from 1973 to 1976 [M], 1977 Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House 45-126.

[13]

Ministry of Forestry. China Forest Resources Inventory from 1977 to 1981 [M], 1982 Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House 23-168.

[14]

Ministry of Forestry. China Forest Resources Inventory from 1984 to 1988 [M], 1990 Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House

[15]

Ministry of Forestry. China Forest Resources Inventory from 1989 to 1993 [M], 1994 Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House

[16]

Ministry of Forestry. China Forestry Yearbook: 1994–1997 [M], 1995 Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House

[17]

Monfreda C., Wackernagel M., Deumling D. Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed ecological footprint and biological capacity assessments [J]. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21: 231-246.

[18]

Newsroom of China forestry yearbook. China Forestry Yearbook: 1986–1993 [M], 1987 Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House

[19]

State Forestry Administration. China Forestry Yearbook: 1998–2003 [M], 1999 Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House

[20]

State Forestry Administration. China Forest Resources Inventory from 1994 to 1998 [M], 2000 Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House

[21]

State Forestry Administration. China Forestry Development Report: 2001–2004 [M], 2001 Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House

[22]

State Forestry Administration. China Forest Resources Report [M], 2005 Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House 1-38.

[23]

Van Vuuren D. P., Smeets E. M. W. Ecological footprints of Benin, Bhutan, Costa Rica and the Netherlands [J]. Ecological Economics, 2000, 34(1): 115-130.

[24]

Wackernagel M., Monfreda C., Erb K.H. Ecological footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961–1999: comparing the conventional approach to the ‘actual land area’ approach [J]. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21(3): 261-269.

[25]

Wackernagel M., Onisto L., Bello P. et al. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept [J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29(3): 375-390.

[26]

Wackernagel M., Rees W. Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth [M], 1996 Philadelphia: New Society Publishers

[27]

Wackernagel M., Yount J.D. The ecological footprint: An indicator of progress toward regional sustainability [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 1998, 51: 511-529.

[28]

Wang S., Van Kooten G.C., Wilson B.M. Mosaic of reform: forest policy in post-1978 China [J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2004, 6: 71-83.

[29]

Xu Z., Zhang Z. Review indicators measuring sustainable development [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2000, 10(2): 60-64.

[30]

Zhang P., Shao G., Zhao G. et al. China’s forest policy for the 21st century [J]. Science, 2000, 288: 2135-2136.

[31]

Zhu C., Rodney T., Feng G. China’s wood market, trade and the environment [M], 2004 Beijing: Science Press 1-61.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

134

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/