PDF
Abstract
An expeditious method for ascertaining species between black bear (Seienarctos thibetanus G. cuiver) and brown bear (Ursus arctos Linnaeus) was developed using tooth measurements from previously identified specimens. The measurement and analysis on 18 tooth measurement indexes (i.e. T1. Length of Pm1-Pm4, T2. L. of M1-M3, T3. M1L., T4. M1 width, T5. M2L., T6. M2W., T7. M3L., T8. M3W., T9. L. of C1 alveolus, T10. W. of C1 alveolus, T11. L. of C1-M2, T12. L. of Pm 4M2, T13.M1L., T14. M1W., T15. M2L., T16. M2W., T17.L. of C1 alveolus, T18. W. of C1 alveolus) of 59 skulls (black bears 25, brown bears 34) indicates that there are significant or the most significant difference between two species in every indexes, however T1, T9, T10, T17 and T18 are not suitable for species discriminator because of their high percent of overlap. The efficient species discriminators and standards (mm) are as follows T2(63.0), T3(22.0), T4(10.2), T5(23.8), T6(13.6), T7(18.0), T8(13.5), T11(110.0), T12(66.0), T13(20.1), T14(15.8), T15(33.0) and T16(17.3). Those who are less than or equal to standard are classified to black bear, the others are brown bear. The method is very convenient and useful with high reliability. Their lowest accuracy percent are 95.0%, most of them over 97%. Different indexes will be chosen refer to the degree of specimen destroyed.
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
Jiang Zhaowen, Zheng Hong, Wang Yuxi, Zhang Shuyun.
Separating brown and black bears in northeast China using tooth measurements.
Journal of Forestry Research, 1995, 6(2): 58-60 DOI:10.1007/BF02875278
| [1] |
Gorton Kenneth R., Morejohn G. Victor. Sexing black bear skulls using lower canine and lower molar measurements. J. Wildl. Manage, 1975, 39(1): 40-44.
|
| [2] |
Kurten B.. Sex dimorphism and size trends in the cave bear,Ursus spelaeus Rosenmuller and Heinroth. Acta Zoologica Fennica, 1955, 90: 1-48.
|
| [3] |
Kurten. The evolution of the polar bear,Ursus maritimus Phipps. Acta Zoologica Fennica, 1964, 108: 1-30.
|
| [4] |
Kurten B.. The evolution of the polar bear,Ursus maritimus Phipps. Acta Zoologica Fennica, 1964, 108: 1-30.
|
| [5] |
Larsen Thor. Sexual dimorphism in the molar rows of the polar bear. J. Wildl. Manage, 1971, 35(2): 374-377.
|
| [6] |
Xiangwen Liu, Qianzhu Xiao. Age composition, sex ratio and reproduction of bears in Heilongjiang province, China. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 1986, 6(3): 161-170.
|
| [7] |
Jiaqi Pei, Yuqi Wu. Sexual dimorphism in the mandible of the Taiwan Reeves’ muntjac. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 1990, 10(4): 248-254.
|
| [8] |
Rausch R. L.. Notes on the black bear,Ursus americanus Pallas, in Alaska, with particular reference to dentition and growth. Zeitschrift fir Saugetierkunde, 1961, 26(2): 77-107.
|
| [9] |
Rausch. Morphogenesis and age-related structure of permanent canine teeth in the brown bear,Ursus arctos L., in Arctic Alaska. Zeitschrift fur Morphologie der Tiere, 1969, 66(2): 167-188.
|
| [10] |
Sauer Peggy R.. Determining sex of black bears from the size of the lower canine tooth. New York Fish and Game J., 1966, 13(2): 140-145.
|
