Characteristics of seasonal movement of hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia) in a temperate forest

Shin-Jae Rhim , Woo-Shin Lee

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2002, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2) : 131 -134.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2002, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2) : 131 -134. DOI: 10.1007/BF02857237
Article

Characteristics of seasonal movement of hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia) in a temperate forest

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This study were carried out in the Experimental Forest (37° 48′ 10″ N, 127° 48′ 50″ E) of Gangwon Forest Development Institute, Gamjeong-ri, Chuncheon, Gangwon-do Province, Korea from Dec. 1999 to Jul. 2002. Eight individuals (three males and five females) of hazel grouse were captured and they were marked with a 14-g necklace-type transmitter. The surveying results showed that females were more active than males throughout the year, but males were more mobile than females in spring. The degree of movement for females and males was similar from summer to winter. The overlap degree of habitat was very large from spring to autumn. Hazel grouse had greater shifts in area use in winter. They used similar area from spring to autumn, made a shift in their habitat use in winter, and then shifted back to the previous habitat.

Keywords

Activity / Hazel grouse / Bonasa bonasia / Korea / Movement / Q958.13

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Shin-Jae Rhim, Woo-Shin Lee. Characteristics of seasonal movement of hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia) in a temperate forest. Journal of Forestry Research, 2002, 13(2): 131-134 DOI:10.1007/BF02857237

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Aberg J., Jansson G., Swenson J.E., Angelstam P. The effect of matrix on the occurrence of hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia) in isolated habitat fragments [J]. Oecologia, 1995, 103: 265-269.

[2]

Bergmann H.H., Klaus S., Muller F., Wiesner J. Das HaselhuhnBonasa bonasia, 1982 2. Auflage Wittenberg: A. Zimsen Verlag

[3]

Dunning J.B., Danielsen B.J., Pulliam H.R. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes [J]. Oikos, 1992, 65: 375-380.

[4]

Ellison L.N. Seasonal social organization and movements of spruce grouse [J]. Condor, 1973, 75: 375-385.

[5]

Gaidar A.A. Ring ofTetrastes bonasia L. and its results. Byulleten Moskovskogo Obshchestva Ispytatelei Prirody [J]. Otdel Biologicheskii, 1973, 78: 120-124. (in Russian with English summary)

[6]

Harvey M.J., Barbour R.W. Home range ofMicrotus ochrogaster as determined by a modified minimum home range method [J]. Journal of Mammalogy, 1965, 46: 398-402.

[7]

Hjeljord O., Wegge P., Rolstad J. et al. Spring-summer movements of male capercaillieTetrao urogallus: a test of the landscape mosaic’ hypothesis [J]. Wildlife Biology, 2000, 6: 251-256.

[8]

Ivanter E.V. K biololli ryabchika v Karelii [J]. Orhitologiya, 1962, 4: 87-98. (in Russian with English summary)

[9]

Opdam P., Van Dorp D., ter Brank C.J.F. The effect of isolation on the number of woodland birds in small woodlots in the Netherlands [J]. Journal of Biogeography, 1984, 11: 473-478.

[10]

Rhim S.J. Characteristics of distribution, behavioral ecology and habitat using pattern of hazei grouseBonasa bonasia [D], 2002 Seoul: Seoul National University (In Korean with English summary)

[11]

Rhim S.J., Lee W.S. Characteristics of hazel grouseBonasa bonasia distribution in southern Korea [J]. Wildlife Biology, 2001, 7: 257-261.

[12]

Rolstad J., Wegge P. CapercaillieTetrao urogallus populations and modern forestry: a case for landscape ecological studies [J]. Finnish Game Research, 1989, 46: 43-52.

[13]

Schroeder M.A. The fall phase of dispersal in juvenile spruce grouse [J]. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 1986, 64: 16-20.

[14]

Swenson, J.E. 1991a. Social organization of hazel grouse and ecological factors influencing it [D]. Ph.D. thesis of University of Alberta. Edmonton.

[15]

Swenson J.E. Is the hazel grouse a poor disperser [C]? Proceeding of International Congress of Union Game Biologist, 1991, 20: 347-352.

[16]

Swenson, J.E. 1995. Seasonal movements by hazel grouse in south-central Sweden [C]. Proceedings of the 6th International Conferences on Grouse, World pheasant association, Udine, Italy, pp. 37–40.

[17]

Swenson J.E., Danielsen J. The ecology of hazel grouse and management of its habitat [J]. Naturschutzreport, 1995, 10: 227-238.

[18]

Swenson J.E., Angelstam P. Habitat separation by sympatric forest grouse in Fennoscandia in relation to boreal forest succession [J]. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 1993, 71: 1303-1310.

[19]

Taylor P.D., Fahrig L., Henein k. et al. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure [J]. Oikos, 1993, 66: 571-573.

[20]

Wiens J.A., Stenseth N.C., Van Horne B. et al. Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology [J]. Oikos, 1993, 66: 369-380.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

149

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/