Spatial connectivity and distribution of landscape type in the natural secondary forests of eastern mountainous region, northeast China—a case study of Mao'ershan region in Heilongjiang Province

Abstract

Mao'ershan region is representative in the natural secondary forested region of the eastern mountainous region, northeast China. The landscape nearest neighbor index and landscape connectivity index were calculated with ARC/INFO software for Mao'ershan region. The spatial distribution of the landscape of the region was analyzed. The results showed that the landscape connectivity index of non-woodland was significantly higher than that of woodland. The landscape connectivity index of natural forest was nearly equal to zero, which means its fragmentation degree is high. The nearest neighbor index of plantation was lower than that of natural forest and non-forestland. Among the man-made forests, the distance index of the coniferous mixed plantation is the lowest, and its pattern is nearly glomeration. The landscape pattern of natural forest presented nearly random distribution. Among non-forest land, the distance index of cut blank was the lowest, and its pattern was also nearly glomeration.

Keywords

Landscape type / Landscape pattern / Nearest neighbor index / Landscape connectivity index / Natural secondary forest / Northeast China / S759.92 / A

References

[1] Xueli Chang, jianguo Wu Spatial analysis of pattern of sandy landscapes in Kerqin, Inner Mongolia [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1998, 18(3): 225-232.

[2] Dake Chen, Xiaofeng Zhou, Zhuning et al. Natural secondary forest-structure, function, dynamic and management [M], 1994 Haerbin: Northeast Forestry University Press 1-30.

[3] Clark P.J., Evans F.C. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in population [J]. Ecology, 1954, 35(4): 445-453.

[4] Forman R.T.T., Baudry J. Hedgerows and hedgerow network in landscape ecology [J]. Environmental Management, 1984, 8: 495-510.

[5] Forman R.T.T., Godron M. Landscape Ecology [M], 1986 Harbin: John Wiley & Sons 619-620.

[6] Jinping Guo Forest landscape ecology research [M], 2001 Beijing: Beijing University Press 196 200 (in Chinese)

[7] Habin Li, Yegang Wu Mathematic Research Methods of Landscape Ecology [M], 1992 Beijing: China Science and Technology Press 209 234 (in Chinese)

[8] Keming Ma, Bojie Fu Spatial neighboring and distribution regularities of landscape types in Donglingshan mountain region, Beijing, China [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2000, 20(5): 748-752.

[9] Mcdonnell, M.J. and Pickett, S.T.A. 1988. Connectivity and the theory of landscape ecology [C]. In: Schreiber, K.F. (eds), Connectivity in Landscape Ecology, Proceeding of the 2nd international Seminar of the “International Association for landscape ecology”, Munstersche Geographische Arbeiten 29, Munster, 17–19.

[10] Merriam G. Landscape dynamics in farmland [J]. TREE, 1988, 3: 16-20.

[11] Merriam G. Saunders D A, Hobbs R J Corridors and connectivity: animal population in heterogeneous environments [C] Nature Conservation 2: The Role of Corridors, 1991 Chipping Norton: Surrey Beatty & Sons 133-142.

[12] Taylor D.P., Merriam G. Habitat fragmentation reduces parasitism of a forest damselfly [J]. Landscape Ecology, 1996, 11(3): 181-189.

[13] Wu J., Vankat J.L. Effects of patch connectivity and arrangement on animal metapopulation dynamics: a simulation study [J]. Ecological Modelling, 1993, 65: 221-254.

[14] Jianguo Wu Landscape Ecology—Pattern, Process, Scale and Hierarchy [M], 2000 Beijing: Higher Education Press 100 109 (in Chinese)

[15] Depeng Yue, Dongmei Wang, Tingning Zhao et al. Study on landscape pattern and ecology change in Beizang town Daxing country, Beijing [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 1997, 19(2): 35-41.