Forest resources variation along with the main rivers in typical forest region of Changbai Mountain

Abstract

The restoration of the riparian vegetation disturbed by human activities is one of the hotspots of watershed ecology. Through interpreting the images of Remote Sensing in 1985 and 1999, the basic information of forest resources of Lushuhe Forest Bureau, which is a typical forest area of Chanbai Mountain was obtained with support of GIS. By dividing Land covers of Lushuihe area into 10 types (water body, residential land, stump land, farming land, wetland, mature conifer forest, midlife conifer forest, mature broadleaf forest, midlife broadleaf forest, and man-made young forest) and dividing the riparian zone into four buffers (in turn 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000 m away from the river), the changes of riparian forest resources during 1985–1999 were analyzed. The results showed that the deforestation intension has obviously decreased and the whole environment has been evidently improved, but the riparian ecosystem was still flimsy. In buffer 1, 2, 3 the area of midlife conifer forest increased largely, but the areas of other types of land covers all decreased. Midlife conifer forest had a comparatively good status in the three buffers. In buffer 4, midlife conifer forest, mature conifer forest, and mature broadleaf forest formed a forest-age rank that is helpful to stabilize the forest ecosystem and exert its functions. Area percentage of wetland decreased in buffer 1, buffer 2, and buffer 3, even in buffer 4 in which forest ecosystem rehabilitated comparatively well, so protecting and rehabilitating wetland is a very difficult task.

Keywords

Forest resources / Buffer / Riparian belt / Remote sensing / GIS / S718.54 / A

References

[1] Brown T.C., Daniel T.C. Landscape aesthetics of riparian environments; relationship of flow quality to scenic quality along a wild and scenic river [J]. Water Resources Research, 1991, 27(4): 1787-1796.

[2] Qinghua Cai, Jiankang Liu Watershed ecology: A new approach of research and protection on riparian ecosystem diversity [J]. Science and Technology Review, 1997, 5: 24-26.

[3] Carson R.T., Mitchell R.C. The value of clean water the public's willingness to pay for boatable, fishable, and swimable quality water [J]. Water Resources Research, 1993, 29(7): 2445-2454.

[4] Jiquan Chen Riparian vegetation characteristics and their function in ecosystem and landscape [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1996, 7(4): 439-448.

[5] Cuervo S.L. Water, a culture heritage [J]. Landscape and urban planning, 1998, 16(1–2): 93-104.

[6] Daubert J., Young R. Recreational-demands for maintaining instream flows: a contingent valuation approach [J]. Amer. J. Agric. Econ., 1981, 63(4): 666-675.

[7] Deffield J.W., Neher C.J., Brown T.C. Recreation benefits of instream flow: application to Montana's Big Hole and Bitterroot Rivers [J]. Water Resources Research, 1992, 28(9): 2169-2181.

[8] Hongbing Deng, Qingli Wang, Qinghua Cai Watershed ecology— New discipline, new idea and approach [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1998, 9(4): 443-449.

[9] Green Pouglass M. Recreational impacts on erosion and runoff in a central Arizona riparian Area [J]. Journal of soil and water Conservation, 1998, 53: 38-42.

[10] Gregory S.V. Kohm K.A., Franklin J. F Riparian management in the 21st century Creation forestry for the 21st century: the science of ecosytem management, 1996 Washington DC: Island Press

[11] Pllock M.M. et al. An approach for greenway suitability analysis [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1998, 53: 349-377.

[12] Huacheng Xu Landscape ecology [M], 1996 Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House 96-98.