Nitrogen and fiber concentration in rumen contents and feces contents of Mongolian gazelles

Ma Jianzhang , Li Junsheng , Jiang Zhaowen , Gu Mingbo

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 1999, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (2) : 103 -106.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 1999, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (2) : 103 -106. DOI: 10.1007/BF02855537
Article

Nitrogen and fiber concentration in rumen contents and feces contents of Mongolian gazelles

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Fecal indicators of nutritional status of wild ungulates were less constrained than that of blood, rumen contents, or urine analyses. Thus, we compared the nitrogen and fiber concentrations of feces with those of the rumen contents of Mongolian gazelles (Procapra guttrurosa) in Hulunbeier Grassland. Rumen contents and fecal nutritional concentrations varied in different seasons. Dietary nitrogen concentrations only increased linearly with increase nitrogen concentration in fecal in winter. There was a positive correlation between rumen NDF (neutral detergent fiber) and fecal NDF concentrations. But the regression coefficient was small (r=0.3917). There was a significant regression equation between rumen contents ADF (acid detergent fiber) and fecal ADF concentrations, as well as ADL (acid detergent lignin) concentrations. Nitrogen concentration was found to be negatively correlated with NDF, ADF, and ADL concentrations both in rumen and in fecal compositions. Our data suggest that fecal nitrogen, ADF, ADL concentrations may assess winter dietary qualities that are in protein, crude fiber and lignin concentrations for Mongolian gazelles.

Keywords

Procapra guttrurosa / Rumen content / Feces / Nitrogen concentration / Fiber concentration

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ma Jianzhang, Li Junsheng, Jiang Zhaowen, Gu Mingbo. Nitrogen and fiber concentration in rumen contents and feces contents of Mongolian gazelles. Journal of Forestry Research, 1999, 10(2): 103-106 DOI:10.1007/BF02855537

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Baker D.L., Hobbs N.T. Composition and quality of elk summer diets in Colorado J. Wildl. Manage., 1982, 46: 694-703.

[2]

Bryant F.C., Kothman M.M., Merrill L.B. Nutritive content of sheep, goat, and white-tailed deer diets in Texas J. Wildl. Manage., 1980, 33: 410-414.

[3]

DelGuidice G.D. Classifying winter under nutrition in deer Via Serum and urinary urea nitrogen Wildl Soe. Bull., 1988, 16: 27-32.

[4]

DelGuidice G.D. Physiological assessment of deer populations by analysis of urine in snow J. Wildl. Manage., 1989, 53: 284-291.

[5]

Erasmus T. Chemical composition of feces as an index of veld quality South Afr. J. Wildl. Res., 1978, 8: 19-24.

[6]

Goering, H.K. and Van Soest, P. J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis: apparatus, procedures, and soma applications. U. S. D. A. Agric. Handbook, 379pp.

[7]

Hobbs N., Baker D.L., Ellis J.E., Swift D.M. Composition and quality of elk winter diets in Colorado J. Wildl. Manage, 1981, 45: 156-171.

[8]

Holechek J.L., Vavra M., Arthun D. Relationship between performance, intake, diet nutritive quality and fecal nutritive quality of catle on mountain range J. Range Manage., 1982, 35: 741-744.

[9]

Holechek J.L., Vavra M., Pieper R.D. Methods for determining the nutritive quality of range ruminant diets: a review J. Anim. Sci., 1982, 54: 363-376.

[10]

Jenks R.B. Soper, Lochmiller R. L., Leslie D.M. Effect of exposure on nitrogen and fiber characteristics of white-tailed deer feces J. Wildl. Manage., 1990, 54: 389-391.

[11]

Kein D.R., Schonheyder F. Variation in ruminal levels among some cervids Can. J. Zool., 1970, 48: 1437-1442.

[12]

Lesile D.M., Starkey E.E. Fecal indices to dietary quality: a reply J. Wildl. Manage., 1987, 51: 321-325.

[13]

McLeod M.N. Plant tannis—thier role in forage quality C.S. I. R.O. Nutr. Abstr. Rev., 1974, 44: 803-815.

[14]

Mould E.D., Robbin C.T. Nitrogen metabolism in elk J. Wildl. Manage., 1981, 45: 323-334.

[15]

Mubanga G., Holechek J.L., Veldez R. Relationship between diet and fecal nutritive quality in mule deer Southwestern Naturalist, 1985, 30: 573-578.

[16]

Renecker L.A., Hudson R.J. Estimation of dry mater intake of free—ranging moose J. Wildl. Manage., 1985, 49: 785-792.

[17]

Robbins C.T. Wildlife feeding and nutrition, 1983 New York: Academic Press 343-410.

[18]

Robbins C.T., Hanley T.A., Hagerman A.E. Role of tannis in defending plants against ruminants: reduction in protein availability Ecology, 1987, 68: 98-107.

[19]

Seal V.S. Nutritional effect on thyroid activity and blood of white-tailed deer J. Wildl. Manage., 1972, 36: 1041-1052.

[20]

Seqelquist C.A. quality of some winter deer forages in the Arkansis Ozarks J. Wildl. Manage., 1972, 36: 174-177.

[21]

Seip D.R., Bunnell F.L. Nutrition of Stone’s sheep on burned and unburned ranges J. Wildl. Manage., 1985, 49: 397-405.

[22]

Staines B.W., Crisp J.M. Observations on food quality in Scottish red deer as determined by chemical analysis of the rumen contents J. Zool., Lond., 1978, 185: 253-277.

[23]

Swift D.M. A simulation model of energy and nitrogen balabce for free-ranging ruminants J. Wildl. Manage., 1983, 47: 620-645.

[24]

Tadashi W., Takatsuki Seiki Comparison of nitrogen and fiber concentration in rumen and fecal contents of Sika deer J. Wildl. Manage., 1993, 65: 43-48.

[25]

White T.C.R. The importance of a relative shortage of food in animal ecology Oecologia, 1978, 33: 71-86.

[26]

Woford C. Evaluation of fecal indices to predict catle diet quality J. Range. Manage., 1985, 38: 450-454.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

119

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/