Analysis on the daily courses of water potential of nine woody species from Cerrado vegetation during wet season

Abstract

The water potential (Ψ) daily courses of 9 woody species from Cerrado vegetation in different weather conditions during wet season were observed and analyzed. The adjusting strategies of 9 species could be divided into 3 groups according to Cluster Analysis and based on the data observed on the January 18, March 20 and April 6. The Ψ values of the first group, which included 2 species, were maintained at the higher level consistently. The Ψ values of the second group, which included 5 species, were intermediate level. The Ψ values of the third group, which included 2 species, were kept in the lower level. The Ψ values of all species always kept pace with the weather condition, especially water condition. During the clear day only one Ψ value peak for all species occurred at midday (12∶30–13∶30). When the overcast or raining occurred for a short period, the fluctuation of Ψ values would appear after about 15–30 min responding to the change of weather condition. Even in the same group under the same external circumstance, there was a clear variation of the leaf Ψ values among different species, which showed that the strategy diversity for plant to balance water relation. From January to April, the Ψ values of 9 species reduced in response to the drought condition. The species with the lower values of water saturation deficiency at turgid loss point (W _sdtlp) the osmotic potential at saturation (π_sat), the osmotic potential at turgid lose point (π_tip) or lower predawn water potential (Ψ_pd) usually had the lower Ψ values at midday. The mechanism of water balance controlled by many systems has been assumed.

Keywords

Wet season / Water balance strategy / Osmotic potential / Water potential / Woody species

References

[1] Boyer J.S. Water potential and plant metabolism: comments on Dr. P.J. Kramer article hanging concepts regarding plant water relation’, 1989, 11(number 7): 565-568.

[2] Kozlowski T.T., Kramer P.J., Pallardy S.G. The physiological ecology of woody plants, 1991 London: Academic Press, INC 248-302.

[3] Kramer P.J. Changing concepts regarding plant water relations Plant, Cell and Environment, 1988, 11: 565-568.

[4] Kubiske M.E., Abrams M.D. Seasonal, diurnal and rehydration-induced variation of pressure-volume relationships inPseudotsuga menziesii Physiologia Plantarum, 1991, 83: 107-116.

[5] Laker M.C., Boedt L.J.J., Hensley M. Predawn leaf water potential as an indicator of plant water stress-with special reference to problem encountered under conditions of higher evaporative demand International Conference on Measurement of Soil and Plant Water Status, Logan Utah, 1987, 2: 25-29.

[6] Larcher W. Physiological plant ecology, 1995 third edition New York, Berlin: Heidelberg: Aufl. Springer-Verlag 215 264

[7] Passioura J.B. Response to Dr. P.J. Kramerarticle, hanging concepts regarding plant water relation’, 1988, 11(number 7): 565-568.

[8] Pielou E.C. The interpretation of ecology data, a primer on classification and ordination, 1984 New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto. Singapore: John, Wiley & Sons, A Wiley-interscience Publication 13-83.

[9] Prado C.H.B.A., Moraes J.A.P.V., Mattos E.A. Gas exchange and leaf water status in potted plants ofCopaifera langsdorffii, 1, responses to water stress Photosynthetica, 1994, 30(2): 207-213.

[10] Prado C.H.B.A., Moraes J.A.P.V., Mattos E.A. Gas exchange and leaf water status in potted plants ofCopaifera langsdorffii, 2, probable influence of low air humidity Photosynthetica, 1995, 30(2): 207-213.

[11] Rundel P.W. et al. Mooney H. A. et al. Shrub life-form. Response of Plants to Multiple Stresses, 1991 San Diego, California. New York, Boston, London, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto: Academic Press, Inc. 345 370

[12] Schulze E.D., Steudle E., Gollan T., Schurr U. Response to Dr. P. J. Kramer article, hanging concepts regarding plant water relation’, 1988, 11(number 7): 565-568.

[13] Saltyer R. O. Plant-water relationships, 1967 London: Academic Press 35-45.

[14] Tazaki T., Ishihara K., Ushijima T. Turner N.C., Kramer P.J. Influence of water stress on photosynthesis and productivity of plants in humid areas Adaptation of Plants to Water and High Temperature, 1980 New York: John Wiley 309-321.