Variation of microfibril angle and its correlation to wood properties in poplars

Abstract

The microfibril angle of seven poplar clones was determined by using X-ray diffraction technique. Microfibril angle, wood basic density, fiber length, fiber width and cellulose content were assessed for every growth ring at breast height for all sample trees. Significant variation in microfibril angle was observed among growth rings. Mean microfibril angle (MFA) at breast height varied from 7.8° to 28° between growth rings with cambial age and showed a consistent pith-to-bark trend of decline angles. Analysis of variance also indicated that there were significant differences in wood basic density, fiber length, fiber width and cellulose content between the growth rings, which had an increasing tendency from pith to bark. Correlations between MFA and examined wood properties were predominantly large and significant negative (α=0.01), and the coefficients were −0.660 for cellulose content, −0.586 for fiber length, −0.516 for fiber width and −0.450 for wood basic density, respectively. Regression analysis with linear and curve estimation indicated that a quadratic function showed the largestR ² and the least standard error for describing the relationships between microfibril angle and measured wood properties, and the correlation coefficients were over −0.45 (n=125). The results from this study suggested that microfibril angle would be a good characteristic for improvement in the future breeding program of poplars.

Keywords

Poplar clone / Microfibril angle / X-ray diffraction / Wood property / Selective breeding

References

[1] Abasolo W.P., Yoshida M., Yamamoto H. et al. Microfibril angle determination of rattan fibers and its influence on the properties of the cane [J]. Holzforschung, 2000, 54(4): 437-442.

[2] Bao F.C., Jiang Z.H. Wood properties of main tree species from plantation in China [M], 1998 Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House 452-457.

[3] Barnett J.R., Bonham V.A. Cellulose microfibril angle in the cell wall of wood fibres [J]. Biol. Rev., 2004, 79: 461-472.

[4] Bonham V.A., Barnett J.R. Fibre length and microfibril angle in silver birch (Betula pendula Roth)[J] Holzforschung, 2001, 55: 159-162.

[5] Cave J.D. Theory of X-ray measurement of microfibril angle in wood [J]. Journal of Forest Products, 1966, 16(10): 37-42.

[6] Cave J.D. The anisotropic elasticity of the plant cell wall [J]. Wood Science and Technology, 1968, 2: 268-278.

[7] Cave J.D., Walker J.C.F. Stiffness of wood in fast-grown plantation softwoods: the influence of microfibril angle [J]. Journal of Forest Products, 1994, 44(5): 43-48.

[8] Cheng J. Wood Science [M], 1985 Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. (in Chinese)

[9] Dickson R.L., Walker J.C.F. Pine: growing commodities or designer trees [J]. Commonwealth Forestry Review, 1997, 76(4): 273-279.

[10] Donaldson L.A. Within and between-tree variation in microfibril angle inPinus radiata [J]. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 1992, 22(1): 77-86.

[11] Donaldson L.A. Variation in microfibril angle among three genetic groups ofPinus radiata tree [J]. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 1993, 23(1): 90-100.

[12] Donaldson L.A., Burdon R.D. Clonal variation and repeatability of microfibril angle inPinus radiata [J]. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 1995, 25(2): 164-174.

[13] Evans, R. 1997. Rapid scanning of microfibril angle in increment cores by X-ray diffractometry [C]. The proceedings of IAWA/IUFRO international workshop on the significance of microfibril angle to wood quality, Westport, NZ.

[14] Evans R., Ilic J. Rapid prediction of wood stiffness from microfibril angle and density [J]. Journal of Forest Products, 2001, 51: 53-57.

[15] Evans R., Stringer S., Kibblewhite R.P. Variation of microfibril angle, density and fibre orientation in twenty-nineEucalyptus nitens trees [J]. Appita Journal, 2000, 53: 450-457.

[16] Fang S., Yang W. Interclonal and within-tree variation in wood properties of poplar clones [J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2003, 14(4): 263-268.

[17] Fang S., Xu X., Lu S., Tang L. Growth dynamics and biomass production in short-rotation poplar plantations: 6-year results for three clones at four spacings [J]. Biomass & Bioenergy, 1999, 17: 415-425.

[18] Gambles, R.L and Zsuffa, L. 1984. Conversion and use of poplar and willow biomass for food, forage and energy in North America [C]. International Poplar Commission, October, Room, Fo: MISC/84/15.

[19] Hirakawa Y., Fujisawa Y. The relationship between microfibril angles of the S2 layer and latewood tracheid lengths on elite sugi tree (Cryptomeria japonica) clones [J]. Mokuzai Gakkaisi, 1995, 41(2): 123-131.

[20] Klasnja B., Kopitovic S., Orlovic S. Variability of some wood properties of eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr.) clones [J]. Wood Sci. Technol., 2003, 37: 331-337.

[21] Li H., Huang M., Ruan X. On variations within trees of microfibril angle inS2 layer of cell secondary wall of cottonwood [J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry College, 1997, 12(1): 61-65.

[22] Lichtenegger H., Reiterer A., Stanzl-Tschegg S.E., Fratzl P. Variation of cellulose microfibril angles in softwoods and hardwoods — a possible strategy of mechanical optimization [J]. Journal of Structural Biology, 1999, 128: 257-269.

[23] Manwiller, F.G. 1972. Wood and bark properties of spruce pine [R]. USDA Forest Service Research Paper SO-78.

[24] Monitoring Bureau of National Technology National standard GB1932~1942-91: Standard methods for analyzing chemical composition of papermaking raw materials [M], 1981 Beijing: China Standard Press (in Chinese)

[25] Pedini M. The variation in the microfibrillar angle within the juvenile wood of sika spruce [J]. IAWA Bulletin, 1992, 13: 261-261.

[26] Pillow, M.Y., Terrell, B.Z., and Hiller, C.H. 1953. Patterns of variation in fibril angles in loblolly pine [R]. USDA Forest Service FPL Report No. D 1935.

[27] Saka, S. 1984. The relationship between the microfibril orientation in the tracheid S2 layer and lignin content of coniferous wood [C]. Pacific Regional Wood Anatomy Conference, Tsukuba, Japan, p100-102.

[28] Stuart S., Evans R. X-ray diffraction estimation of microfibril angle variation in eucalypt wood [J]. Appita, 1994, 48(3): 197-200.

[29] Walker J. C. F., Woollons R.C. Butterfield B. G. Cell wall organization and the properties of xylem — a speculative review [C] Microfibril Angle in Wood: Proceedings of the IAWA/IUFRO International Workshop on the Significance of Microfibril Angle to Wood Quality, 1998 Canterbury, N.Z.: Westport, N.Z. University of Canterbury Press 13-26.

[30] Walker J.C.F., Butterfield B.G. The importance of microfibril angle for the processing. Industries [J]. New Zealand Forestry, 1995, 40(4): 34-40.

[31] Yamashita K., Hirakawa Y., Fujisawa Y., Nakada R. Effects of microfibril angle and density on variation of modulus of elasticity of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica) logs among eighteen cultivars [J]. Mokuzai Gakkaishi, 2000, 46: 510-522.

[32] Yang J.L., Evans R. Prediction of MOE of eucalypt wood from microfibril angle and density [J]. Holz als Rohund Werkstoff, 2003, 61: 449-452.

[33] Yang W., Fang S. Temporal and spatial variation patterns of microfibril angle for poplar clones [J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2004, 32(1): 25-28.

[34] Zhang S.Y., Yu Q., Beaulieu J. Genetic variation in veneer quality and its correlation to growth in white spruce [J]. Can. J. For. Res., 2004, 34: 1311-1318.