Molecular Insights into the estrogenic effects and human health risks of bisphenol AF and bisphenol fluorene

Abstract

Bisphenol A (BPA) has been strictly regulated worldwide due to its well-documented adverse health effects, prompting the widespread use of structural analogs such as bisphenol AF (BPAF) and bisphenol fluorene (BHPF). Emerging evidence shows that these substitutes also exhibit estrogenic activity, challenging their presumed safety. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying their modulation of estrogen receptors (ERs) remain largely unknown. Addressing this gap is critical for accurate risk assessment and the development of safer alternatives. Herein, we employed computational toxicology approaches to elucidate the interaction mechanisms of BPAF and BHPF with ER alpha (ERα), a central regulator of endocrine function and breast cancer progression. Our results showed that BHPF displays the greatest estrogenic potency among the tested compounds. Molecular interaction analyses revealed that hydrophobic interactions, especially the van der Waals force, rather than hydrogen bonding, predominantly govern the binding of the two bisphenol derivatives (BPs) to ERα. Notably, the rigid fluorenyl ring structure of BHPF markedly enhances van der Waals interactions, resulting in more stable ER binding and suggesting potential for high biological retention and cumulative risk. Consistently, toxicological assessments indicated that BHPF poses elevated health risks to the lungs and gastrointestinal system. By contrast, BPAF, with its flexible scaffold, exhibited more diverse binding interactions. It exhibits stronger organ-specific toxicity, notably affecting the cardiovascular system and kidneys. This study provides molecular-level insight into the binding mechanisms of BPs with ERα, offering theoretical support for understanding their potential endocrine-disrupting effects and informing environmental health risk assessments.

Keywords

Bisphenol analogs / estrogen receptor alpha / molecular docking / molecular dynamics simulation / hydrophobic interactions / BPAF / BHPF

References

[1] Ma Y,Wu J.The adverse health effects of bisphenol A and related toxicity mechanisms.Environ Res2019;176:108575

[2] Vilarinho F,van der Kellen A,Silva AS.Bisphenol A in food as a result of its migration from food packaging.Trends Food Sci Technol2019;91:33-65

[3] Hahladakis JN,Gerassimidou S.An overview of the occurrence, fate, and human risks of the bisphenol-A present in plastic materials, components, and products.Integr Environ Assess Manag2023;19:45-62

[4] Krivohlavek A,Budeč M.Migration of BPA from food packaging and household products on the Croatian market.Int J Environ Res Public Health2023;20:2877 PMCID:PMC9957217

[5] Khan NG,Adiga D.A comprehensive review on the carcinogenic potential of bisphenol A: clues and evidence.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int2021;28:19643-63 PMCID:PMC8099816

[6] Abraham A.A review on sources and health impacts of bisphenol A.Rev Environ Health2020;35:201-10

[7] Tan H,Wang S,Widelka M.Neonatal exposure to bisphenol analogues disrupts genital development in male mice.Environ Pollut2023;330:121783

[8] Lv Y,Fang Y.In utero exposure to bisphenol A disrupts fetal testis development in rats.Environ Pollut2019;246:217-24

[9] Diamante G,Zamora Z.Systems toxicogenomics of prenatal low-dose BPA exposure on liver metabolic pathways, gut microbiota, and metabolic health in mice.Environ Int2021;146:106260 PMCID:PMC7775895

[10] Frankowski R,Grześkowiak T.The presence of bisphenol A in the thermal paper in the face of changing European regulations - a comparative global research.Environ Pollut2020;265:114879

[11] Frankowski R,Smułek W.Removal of bisphenol A and its potential substitutes by biodegradation.Appl Biochem Biotechnol2020;191:1100-10 PMCID:PMC7320052

[12] Wang J,Liu W.Comprehensive assessment of the safety of bisphenol A and its analogs based on multi-toxicity tests in vitro.J Hazard Mater2025;486:136983

[13] Pan Y,Wei X,Zeng L.Bisphenol and analogues in indoor dust from E-waste recycling sites, neighboring residential homes, and urban residential homes: implications for human exposure.Sci Total Environ2024;907:168012

[14] Bousoumah R,Iavicoli I.Biomonitoring of occupational exposure to bisphenol A, bisphenol S and bisphenol F: a systematic review.Sci Total Environ2021;783:146905

[15] Pathak RK,Shin SH,Lee HS.Deciphering the mechanisms and interactions of the endocrine disruptor bisphenol A and its analogs with the androgen receptor.J Hazard Mater2024;469:133935

[16] Li R,Qiu W.Transcriptomic analysis of bisphenol AF on early growth and development of zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae.Environ Sci Ecotechnol2020;4:100054 PMCID:PMC9488094

[17] Fan X,Jia X.Reproductive toxicity and teratogenicity of fluorene-9-bisphenol on Chinese medaka (Oryzias sinensis): a study from laboratory to field.Environ Sci Technol2023;57:561-9

[18] Lei B,Zhang X.Bisphenol AF exerts estrogenic activity in MCF-7 cells through activation of Erk and PI3K/Akt signals via GPER signaling pathway.Chemosphere2019;220:362-70

[19] Stanojević M.Mechanisms of bisphenol A and its analogs as endocrine disruptors via nuclear receptors and related signaling pathways.Arch Toxicol2025;99:2397-417 PMCID:PMC12185661

[20] Salmaso V.Bridging molecular docking to molecular dynamics in exploring ligand-protein recognition process: an overview.Front Pharmacol2018;9:923 PMCID:PMC6113859

[21] Sousa SF,Coimbra JTS.Protein-ligand docking in the new millennium - a retrospective of 10 years in the field.Curr Med Chem2013;20:2296-314

[22] Maier JA,Kasavajhala K,Hauser KE.ff14SB: improving the accuracy of protein side chain and backbone parameters from ff99SB.J Chem Theory Comput2015;11:3696-713 PMCID:PMC4821407

[23] Sun Y,Zhao B.Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation decoding molecular mechanism of EDCs binding to hERRγ.J Mol Model2024;30:127

[24] Ikhlas S,Ahmad M.Comparative study of the interactions between bisphenol-A and its endocrine disrupting analogues with bovine serum albumin using multi-spectroscopic and molecular docking studies.J Biomol Struct Dyn2019;37:1427-37

[25] Frisch MJ,Schlegel HB. Gaussian 09 Rev. D.01. 2014. https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=839f33cc-9114-4a55-8f1a-3f1520324ef5. (accessed 17 Dec 2025)

[26] Zhao Y.The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06 functionals and 12 other functionals.Theor Chem Account2008;119:525

[27] Marenich AV,Truhlar DG.Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions.J Phys Chem B2009;113:6378-96

[28] Morris GM,Lindstrom W.AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: automated docking with selective receptor flexibility.J Comput Chem2009;30:2785-91 PMCID:PMC2760638

[29] Van Der Spoel, D.; Lindahl, E.; Hess, B.; Groenhof, G.; Mark, A. E.; Berendsen, H. J. GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free.J Comput Chem2005;26:1701-18

[30] Abraham MJ,Schulz R.GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers.SoftwareX2015;1-2:19-25

[31] Li A.Characterization of the transition state of protein unfolding by use of molecular dynamics: chymotrypsin inhibitor 2.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A1994;91:10430-4 PMCID:PMC45034

[32] Essmann U,Berkowitz ML,Lee H.A smooth particle mesh Ewald method.J Chem Phys1995;103:8577-93

[33] Kollman PA,Reyes C.Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models.Acc Chem Res2000;33:889-97

[34] Miller, B. R. 3rd.; McGee, T. D. Jr.; Swails, J. M.; Homeyer, N.; Gohlke, H.; Roitberg, A. E. MMPBSA.py: an efficient program for end-state free energy calculations.J Chem Theory Comput2012;8:3314-21

[35] Valdés-Tresanco MS,Valiente PA.gmx_MMPBSA: a new tool to perform end-state free energy calculations with GROMACS.J Chem Theory Comput2021;17:6281-91

[36] Benninghoff AD,Koch DC,Kolluri SK.Estrogen-like activity of perfluoroalkyl acids in vivo and interaction with human and rainbow trout estrogen receptors in vitro.Toxicol Sci2011;120:42-58 PMCID:PMC3044205

[37] Mu X,Li X.Developmental effects and estrogenicity of bisphenol A alternatives in a zebrafish embryo model.Environ Sci Technol2018;52:3222-31

[38] Ji B,He X,Xie XQ.Prediction of the binding affinities and selectivity for CB1 and CB2 ligands using homology modeling, molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations, and MM-PBSA binding free energy calculations.ACS Chem Neurosci2020;11:1139-58

[39] Mansouri K,Rybacka A.CERAPP: collaborative estrogen receptor activity prediction project.Environ Health Perspect2016;124:1023-33 PMCID:PMC4937869

[40] Blair RM,Branham WS.The estrogen receptor relative binding affinities of 188 natural and xenochemicals: structural diversity of ligands.Toxicol Sci2000;54:138-53

[41] Abdulhameed AAR,Bahari H.Adverse effects of bisphenol A on the liver and its underlying mechanisms: evidence from in vivo and in vitro studies.Biomed Res Int2022;2022:8227314 PMCID:PMC9398799

[42] Das S,Biswas S,Karmakar S.Unravelling bisphenol A-induced hepatotoxicity: insights into oxidative stress, inflammation, and energy dysregulation.Environ Pollut2024;362:124922

[43] Zhang L,Tang Y.Co-exposure to bisphenol a and arsenic enhance hepatotoxicity in zebrafish by targeting the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis and PPAR pathway.Environ Pollut2025;384:127037

[44] Mi P,Feng XZ.Acute fluorene-9-bisphenol exposure damages early development and induces cardiotoxicity in zebrafish (Danio rerio).Ecotoxicol Environ Saf2020;202:110922

[45] Zhang S,Luan J,Zhao X.Fluorene-9-bisphenol acts on the gut-brain axis by regulating oxytocin signaling to disturb social behaviors in zebrafish.Environ Res2024;255:119169

[46] Gu J,Zhou L.Oxidative stress in bisphenol AF-induced cardiotoxicity in zebrafish and the protective role of N-acetyl N-cysteine.Sci Total Environ2020;731:139190

[47] Scopel CFV,Machado MRF.BPA toxicity during development of zebrafish embryo.Braz J Biol2021;81:437-47