Characterization of select salon chemical exposures among Black and Latina U.S. hairdressers serving women of color
Lucy K. Kavi , Matthew N. Newmeyer , Walkiria Pool , Katrina Randolph , Lydia M. Louis , Ana M. Rule , Carsten Prasse , Lesliam Quirós-Alcalá
Journal of Environmental Exposure Assessment ›› 2025, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (4) : 37
Characterization of select salon chemical exposures among Black and Latina U.S. hairdressers serving women of color
Hairdressers are continually exposed to chemicals, including many endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), yet few studies have assessed these exposures among U.S. hairdressers despite the potential health risks. We quantified concentrations of five biomarkers - four EDC exposure biomarkers [2-naphthol, methylparaben (MeP), ethylparaben, and propylparaben] and capsaicin - in post-shift urine samples from 23 female hairdressers of color (Black/Latina) serving a primarily ethnic clientele in the Maryland/Washington DC metropolitan area. Results from hairdressers were compared to those from 17 female office workers of similar race/ethnicity and to a representative sample of 431 similarly aged women in the U.S. general population. We also assessed exposure determinants for highly detected biomarkers among hairdressers. Overall, hairdressers had higher biomarker concentrations than office workers and women in the U.S. general population. Geometric mean (GM) concentrations of 2-naphthol and MeP were 2-3 times higher in hairdressers than in office workers (2-naphthol:17.4 vs. 7.59 ng/mL; MeP: 150 vs. 48.9 ng/mL; both P < 0.01), and 1.5-2.5 times higher than in U.S. women (2-naphthol: 15.5 vs. 6.31 ng/mL; MeP: 134 vs. 87.0 ng/mL). Hairdressers serving predominantly Black clientele had higher biomarker concentrations than those serving a predominantly Latinx clientele. Select salon services and products (e.g., chemical straightening/relaxing, semipermanent hair color, hair extensions, hairspray) were associated with higher 2-naphthol and MeP concentrations, while hair bleach use and braiding were associated with lower concentrations. Mask use during chemical-intensive services was associated with reduced MeP concentrations (GM: 117 vs. 159 ng/mL). Larger studies are needed to comprehensively assess exposures and reduce health risks for this workforce.
Personal care products / hairdressers / endocrine disruptors / parabens / Black / Latinx
| [1] |
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Labor force statistics from the current population survey. Household data annual averages. 11. Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race and hispanic or latino ethnicity. https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm. (accessed 14 Oct 2025) |
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022 (MoCRA). https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetics-laws-regulations/modernization-cosmetics-regulation-act-2022-mocra. (accessed 14 Oct 2025) |
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
PubChem. Capsaicin. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/1548943. (accessed 14 Oct 2025) |
| [33] |
Consumer Product Information Database. What’s in it: health effects of consumer products. https://www.whatsinproducts.com/pages/index/1. (accessed 14 Oct 2025) |
| [34] |
Environmental Working Group. EWG Skin Deep® Cosmetics Database. EWG Database. https://www.ewg.org/skindeep/. (accessed 14 Oct 2025) |
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals. https://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/. (accessed 14 Oct 2025) |
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
PubChem. 2-Naphthol. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/8663. (accessed 14 Oct 2025) |
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). FDA authority over cosmetics: how cosmetics are not FDA-approved, but are FDA-regulated. 2022. https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetics-laws-regulations/fda-authority-over-cosmetics-how-cosmetics-are-not-fda-approved-are-fda-regulated. (accessed 14 Oct 2025) |
| [48] |
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Prohibited & restricted ingredients in cosmetics. 2022. https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetics-laws-regulations/prohibited-restricted-ingredients-cosmetics. (accessed 14 Oct 2025) |
| [49] |
European Union. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products (recast) (Text with EEA relevance). 2009. pp. 59-209. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2009/1223/oj/eng. (accessed 14 Oct 2025) |
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
Environmental Working Group (EWG). Big market for Black cosmetics, but less-hazardous choices limited. 2016. https://www.ewg.org/research/big-market-black-cosmetics-less-hazardous-choices-limited. (accessed 14 Oct 2025) |
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |