A case study on heavy metal contamination and sediment texture at Kolatoli Beach, Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh: implications for ecological and human health risks
Nazmul Hossain , Md. Simul Bhuyan , Mohammad Ismail , Sajid Al Azwad , Maksudur Rahman Asif , Md Mehedi Iqbal
Journal of Environmental Exposure Assessment ›› 2025, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : 20
A case study on heavy metal contamination and sediment texture at Kolatoli Beach, Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh: implications for ecological and human health risks
Rapid industrial growth and urban expansion have exacerbated the pollution of coastal beach sediments with heavy metals (HMs), particularly in developing countries such as Bangladesh, where the persistence and toxicity of these pollutants pose significant environmental and human health risks. Thus, this study investigated the contamination of HMs (Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe, Cd, Pb) to evaluate their associated risks at Kolatoli Beach, Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. Additionally, sediment texture analysis was performed to assess grain size distribution, which influences the mobility of these metals. The ecological risk (ER) was assessed through multiple indices, including the geo-accumulation index (Igeo), contamination factor (CF), pollution load index (PLI), ecological risk, and potential ecological risk index (PERI). Moreover, human health risk assessment (HHRA) was conducted for children and adults to determine non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks (CRs) through ingestion, inhalation, and dermal exposure. The sediment was predominantly sandy (93.72%), with lower clay (0%-2.51%) and silt (3.77%-6.28%) contents. The mean HM concentration in the sediment samples followed the descending order of Fe > Mn > Cu > Zn > Pb > Cd. The Igeo, CF, and PLI values indicated anthropogenic Cu and Pb accumulation in beach sediments, while Zn, Mn, and Fe remained at background levels. The PERI values ranged from 29.24 to 42.37, categorizing all samples under the ‘low ER’ classification (PERI < 150), though Pb and Cu had higher ER values. The overall hazard index (HI) values were below 1 for both age groups, indicating no significant non-carcinogenic risk (NCR). Total carcinogenic risk (TCR) values (5.99 × 10-6 for children, 3.99 × 10-6 for adults) remained within safe limits, though children posed higher CR. The statistical analyses revealed that HM contaminations were influenced by multiple factors. Overall, the study showed low to moderate HM contamination in the beach sediments, with tolerable ecological and human health risks.
Beach sediments / sediment texture / risk assessment / Cox’s Bazar
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
Goddard-Dwyer, M. Marine humic substances: distribution, cycling pathways, and biogeochemical function [dissertation]. University of Liverpool; 2024. Available from: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3187037/1/201508189_Jun2024.pdf (accessed on 2025-7-14) |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
Rizo O, Buzón González F, Arado López JO, Denis Alpízar O. Heavy metal levels in dune sands from Matanzas urban resorts and Varadero beach (Cuba): assessment of contamination and ecological risks.Mar Pollut Bull2015;101:961-4 |
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
Wedepohl K. The composition of the continental crust.Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta1995;59:1217-32 |
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
USEPA. Baseline human health risk assessment: Vasquez Boulevard and I-70 Superfund Site, Denver, Colorado. Denver (CO): US Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII; 2001:1-170. Available from: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P1006STM.PDF?Dockey=P1006STM.PDF (accessed on 2025-7-14) |
| [32] |
USEPA. Exposure Factors Handbook (1997 Final Report). National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development; 1997: 1-201. Available from: https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/efp/recordisplay.cfm?deid=12464 (accessed on 2025-7-14) |
| [33] |
USEPA. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency;1989. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-09/documents/rags_a.pdf (accessed on 2025-7-14) |
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
USEPA. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS). Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (HHEM). Part E: Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment. US EPA 2004, 1. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-09/documents/part_e_impl_2004_final_supp.pdf (accessed on 2025-7-14) |
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (USDA). Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. Soil Survey Staff U.S. Department Agriculture Handbook 436; U.S. Department Agriculture: 1975. Available from: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-06/Soil%20Taxonomy.pdf (accessed on 2025-7-14) |
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
USEPA. An overview of sediment quality in the United States (EPA 905/9-88-002). Office of Water Regulations and Standards, U.S. EPA Region 5; 1987. Available from: https://archive.epa.gov/water/archive/polwaste/web/pdf/overview.pdf (accessed on 2025-7-14) |
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |