Organophosphate pesticides in herbal mixtures from Bayelsa State, Nigeria: implication for human exposure and risks
Godswill O. Tesi , Bulouebibo Lari , Anthony A. Ogbuta , Iniebiyo Felagha , Given C. Obodoka , Wellington E. Ogbomade , Kingsley E. Okpara , Ejovi Osioma , Iwekumo E. Agbozu
Journal of Environmental Exposure Assessment ›› 2025, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : 2
Organophosphate pesticides in herbal mixtures from Bayelsa State, Nigeria: implication for human exposure and risks
This study investigated the presence of organophosphate pesticides (OPPs) in fifty herbal mixture samples obtained from major towns in Bayelsa, Nigeria, to evaluate their safety. OPPs were quantified using a gas chromatograph (GC) coupled with a mass-selective detector after solvent extraction. The results showed that all fifty herbal mixtures contained detectable levels of OPPs, with detection frequencies for individual OPP congeners ranging from 52% for pyraclofos to 90% for diazinon, the most frequently detected congener. At least three OPPs were detected in each sample. Total OPP concentrations varied from 3.80 to 48.0 ng·L-1, 4.50 to 51.6 ng·g-1, and 2.96 to 18.1 ng·g-1 in liquid, powder, and capsule herbal mixtures, respectively. These concentrations were below the maximum residue limits (MRLs) set by the European Pharmacopeia. Computed hazard index (HI) values were generally < 1, indicating no significant non-carcinogenic risk associated with the ingestion of these herbal mixtures. The contribution of individual OPP congeners to the HI followed the order: O-ethyl O-4-nitrophenyl phenylphosphonothioate (EPN) > diazinon > pirimiphos-methyl > quinalphos > chlorpyrifos > chlorpyrifos-methyl. This study underscores the need for continuous monitoring and the application of rigorous scientific standards to herbal mixtures to ensure consumer safety.
OPPs / hazard index / daily intake / non-carcinogenic risk / GC-MSD
| [1] |
USEPA. Basic information about pesticide ingredients. 2024. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/ingredients-used-pesticide-products/basic-information-about-pesticide-ingredients. [Last accessed on 6 Jan 2025] |
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
European Commission. Guidance document on pesticide analytical methods for risk assessment and post-approval control and monitoring purposes. SANTE/2020/12830. Available from: https://food.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-03/pesticides_ppp_app-proc_guide_res_mrl-guidelines-2020-12830.pdf. [Last accessed on 6 Jan 2025] |
| [23] |
European Commission. Analytical quality control and method validation for pesticide residues analysis in food and feed. SANTE/12682/2019. Available from: https://www.eurl-pesticides.eu/userfiles/file/eurlall/aqcguidance_sante_2019_12682.pdf. [Last accessed on 6 Jan 2025] |
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
USDOE (United States Department of Energy). The risk assessment information system. Available from: https://rais.ornl.gov/documents/RAIS_ORNL_6942.pdf. [Last accessed on 6 Jan 2025] |
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
USEPA. Regional screening levels (RSL) summary tables. 2022. Available from: https://www.hawaiipublicschools.org/DOE%20Forms/HIDOE-Soil-Sampling-LahainaSchools-Lab-Results.pdf. [Last accessed on 6 Jan 2025] |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |