Method validation and comparison of quantification strategies for analysis of chlorinated paraffins in indoor dust by liquid chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry
Thomas J. McGrath , Adrian Covaci , Giulia Poma
Journal of Environmental Exposure Assessment ›› 2022, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (2) : 9
This paper describes the validation of a method for the simultaneous analysis of short-, medium-, and long-chained chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs, respectively) in indoor dust by ultrasonic extraction and liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-HRMS). A series of spike and recovery experiments (n = 54) were conducted using CPs with varying carbon-chain lengths, chlorination degree, and concentrations. Technical standard mixtures of the SCCPs, MCCPs, and LCCPs were used to quantify spiking experiments by two commonly used calibration procedures: pattern deconvolution and chlorine-content calibration. The results quantified by pattern deconvolution meet the acceptability limits of the European Union Reference Laboratory (EURL) for all tests with trueness ranging from 72% to 141% and good precision represented by coefficients of variation (CVs) less than 15% in all experiments. The chlorine-content calibration also performed well overall, but on average overestimated concentrations for SCCPs and MCCPs by 32% and 25%, respectively, and did not meet the EURL’s trueness limits in all cases. CVs were below 18% for all results derived from the chlorine-content quantification. The final method was successfully applied to indoor dust samples from offices (n = 4), homes (n = 3), and a vehicle (n = 1) from Melbourne, Australia, with SCCPs (C10-13), MCCPs (C14-17), and
Chlorinated paraffins / liquid chromatography / high-resolution mass spectrometry / indoor dust
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
SC-8/11: Listing of short-chain chlorinated paraffins. Available from: http://chm.pops.int/Portals/0/download.aspx?d=UNEP-POPS-COP.8-SC-8-11.English.pdf [Last accessed on 14 Mar 2022] |
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
General Protocol for EU Proficiency Tests on Pesticide Residues in Food and Feed. Available from: http://www.eurl-pesticides.eu/userfiles/file//General_Protocol_v8.pdf [Last accessed on 14 Mar 2022] |
| [36] |
Proficiency Test on the Determination of PCDD/Fs, PCBs, BFRs, PFASs and CPs in Fish fillet 2020. Available from: https://eurl-pops.eu/user/pages/06.news/23.EURL-PT-POP-2001-FI-PBDE/EURL-PT_Fish_fillet_2020-Report%20PBDE%20HBCDD%20v1.0.pdf?g-73eaced6 [Last accessed on 14 Mar 2022] |
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |