Performance Analysis of Harmonic Drive Based on Different Tooth Thickness Modification Methods
Zelin LONG , Yang XU , Guosheng XIE , Yixin ZHANG
Journal of Donghua University(English Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1) : 131 -139.
In order to eliminate the meshing interference between the flexspline and circular spline after the taper deformation of the flexspline, the radial deformation difference method, major and minor axis fitting method, and ellipse fitting method are used to modify the tooth thickness of the flexspline and analyze the performance indexes such as the assembly stress, transmission error, and fatigue life. Firstly, the conjugate tooth profile is solved based on the quadruple-circular-arc tooth profile and modified kinematic method. Then, based on the finite element radial deformation of the flexspline, the principle and characteristics of three modification methods are analyzed, and the modification amount of each section of the flexspline tooth is calculated. Finally, the influence of the three modification methods on the performance of the harmonic drive is compared. The results show that the radial deformation difference method can initially determine the modification amount. The minimum static assembly stress is 406. 22 MPa by the major and minor axis fitting method. The ellipse fitting method has the best dynamic performance, small transmission error fluctuation, a peak-to-peak value of 3. 060", and a maximum fatigue life of 107. 558 cycles.
harmonic drive / taper deformation / flexspline / quadruple-circular-arc tooth profile / tooth thickness modification
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |