Automatic Modulation Recognition Based on a New Deep K-SVD Denoising Algorithm

Yanhe Li , Xingxing He , Chun Zhou

Journal of Data Science and Intelligent Systems ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 18 -26.

PDF (2114KB)
Journal of Data Science and Intelligent Systems ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) :18 -26. DOI: 10.47852/bonviewJDSIS32021244
RESEARCH ARTICLE
research-article
Automatic Modulation Recognition Based on a New Deep K-SVD Denoising Algorithm
Author information +
History +
PDF (2114KB)

Abstract

Automatic modulation recognition (AMR) has a wide range of applications in wireless communication. To solve the problem that the previous methods convert signal modulation recognition into image recognition, leading to increased time costs and information loss, an AMR approach consisting of the improved deep singular value decomposition (K-SVD) denoising algorithm is suggested. First, the effectiveness of the model for random sine wave denoising is demonstrated by simulation. Second, the original I/Q signals are fed into the modified deep K-SVD model for denoising, skipping the complicated image processing steps. Finally, the noise-reduced signals are input into a multi-channel convolutional long short-term neural network to complete the modulation recognition. To solve the slow convergence problem of iterative shrinkage thresholding algorithms in sparse coding, the fast iterative shrinkage thresholding algorithm is adopted to improve the computational efficiency and obtain a better denoising effect. The experiments show that the improved model has an average recognition accuracy of 91.26%at different signal-to-noise ratio (SNRs) from −2 dB to 18 dB, which is better than the state-of-the-art modulation recognition models.

Keywords

deep learning / automatic modulation recognition / sparse coding / deep K-SVD

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yanhe Li, Xingxing He, Chun Zhou. Automatic Modulation Recognition Based on a New Deep K-SVD Denoising Algorithm. Journal of Data Science and Intelligent Systems, 2025, 3 (1) : 18-26 DOI:10.47852/bonviewJDSIS32021244

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Funding Support

This work was sponsored by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2682020ZT107); National Natural Science Foundation of China (62106206); Humanities and Social Sciences Project of the Ministry of Education (19YJCZH048, 20XJCZH016); and Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Program (2023YFH0066).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Author Contribution Statement

Yanhe Li: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Project administration. Xingxing He: Resources, Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition. Chun Zhou: Writing -review & editing, Project administration.

References

[1]

He C., Chen J., Jin Z., & Lei Y. (2023). Automatic modulation recognition based on multimodal time-frequency feature fusion. Computer Science, 50(4), 226-232. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.220600242

[2]

Jiao X., Wei X. L., Xue Y., Wang C., & Duan Q. (2022). Automatic modulation recognition based on deep learning. Computer Science, 49(5), 266-278. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.211000085

[3]

Han G., Li J. D., & Lu D. H. (2004). Study of modulation recognition based on HOCs and SVM. In 2004 IEEE 59th Vehicular Technology Conference, 2, 898-902. https://doi.org/10.1109/VETECS.2004.1388960

[4]

Hong L., & Ho K. C. (2000). BPSK and QPSK modulation classification with unknown signal level. In MILCOM 2000 Proceedings of 21st Century Military Communications. Architectures and Technologies for Information Superiority, 2,976-980. https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.2000.904076

[5]

Lunden J., & Koivunen V. (2007). Automatic radar waveform recognition. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 1(1), 124-136. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTSP.2007.897055

[6]

Li R., Li L., Yang S., & Li S. (2018). Robust automated VHF modulation recognition based on deep convolutional neural networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 22(5), 946-949. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2018.2809732

[7]

Peng S., Jiang H., Wang H., Alwageed H., Zhou Y., Sebdani M. M., & Yao Y. D. (2019). Modulation classification based on signal constellation diagrams and deep learning. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 30(3), 718-727. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2850703

[8]

Zhang Z., Wang C., Gan C., Sun S., & Wang M. (2019). Automatic modulation classification using convolutional neural network with features fusion of SPWVD and BJD. IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks, 5(3), 469-478. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSIPN.2019.2900201

[9]

Zhang J., Hou J., & Chen G. (2022). jī yú lián hé juàn jī yǔǔ jì yì shén jīng wǎng luò de xìn hào zì dòng tiáo zhì shí bié [Automatic modulation recognition for signals based on convolutional and memory neural network]. Computer Applications and Software, 39(08), 226-233.

[10]

Rajendran S., Meert W., Giustiniano D., Lenders V., & Pollin S. (2018). Deep learning models for wireless signal classification with distributed low-cost spectrum sensors. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, 4(3), 433-445. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCCN.2018.2835460

[11]

Xu J., Luo C., Parr G., & Luo Y. (2020). A spatiotemporal multi-channel learning framework for automatic modulation recognition. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 9(10), 1629-1632. https://doi.org/10.1109/LWC.2020.2999453

[12]

West N. E., & O’Shea T. (2017). Deep architectures for modulation recognition. In 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/DySPAN.2017.7920754

[13]

Aharon M., Elad M., & Bruckstein A. (2006). K-SVD: An algorithm for designing overcomplete dictionaries for sparse representation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 54(11), 4311-4322. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2006.881199

[14]

Elad M., & Aharon M. (2006). Image denoising via sparse and redundant representations over learned dictionaries. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 15(12), 3736-3745. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2006.881969

[15]

Pati Y. C., Rezaiifar R., & Krishnaprasad P. S. (1993). Orthogonal matching pursuit: Recursive function approximation with applications to wavelet decomposition. In Proceedings of 27th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 1,40-44. https://doi.org/10.1109/acssc.1993.342465

[16]

Beck A., & Teboulle M. (2009). A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 2(1), 183-202. https://doi.org/10.1137/080716542

[17]

Gregor K., & LeCun Y. (2010). Learning fast approximations of sparse coding. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning, 399-406.

[18]

O’Shea T., & West N. (2016). Radio machine learning dataset generation with GNU radio. Proceedings of the GNU Radio Conference, 1(1).

[19]

O’Shea T. J., Corgan J., & Clancy T. C. (2016). Convolutional radio modulation recognition networks. In Engineering Applications of Neural Networks: 17th International Conference, 213-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44188-7_16

[20]

Ke Z., & Vikalo H. (2022). Real-time radio technology and modulation classification via an LSTM auto-encoder. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 21(1), 370-382. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2021.3095855

PDF (2114KB)

8

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/