Combination Planning for Attitude Maneuver of Deep Space Probes Based on Multi-Objective Optimization

WANG Zhuo1,2, XU Rui1,2

PDF(910 KB)
PDF(910 KB)
Journal of Deep Space Exploration ›› 2021, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2) : 147-153. DOI: 10.15982/j.issn.2096-9287.2021.20200069
Topic:Autonomous Planning Technology for Deep Space Exploration
Topic:Autonomous Planning Technology for Deep Space Exploration

Combination Planning for Attitude Maneuver of Deep Space Probes Based on Multi-Objective Optimization

  • WANG Zhuo1,2, XU Rui1,2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

For deep space detectors attitude maneuver tasks,it is necessary to optimize several performance index parameters. In this paper,the multi-objective planning problem of attitude maneuver for deep space detectors is studied,and a multi- target combination planning method is proposed to calculate the attitude maneuver path. For multi-objective programming,the attitude objective function is designed through physical planning method,which transforms multi-objective optimization into a single objective planning problem,and at the same time replaces fitness function as the population selection criterion. The combined differential evolution algorithm is designed to improve the mutation process. The initial attitude path obtained by fast Euler maneuver is added to the mutation formula with a certain probability,so as to improve the convergence rate and program operation efficiency,and realize the multi constraint and multi-objective attitude maneuver path combination planning. Finally,the feasibility and effectiveness of this method are verified by numerical simulation of large angle attitude maneuver of deep space probes.

Keywords

uncertainty / deep space exploration / attitude maneuver planning / multi-objective optimization / combined differential evolution

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
WANG Zhuo, XU Rui. Combination Planning for Attitude Maneuver of Deep Space Probes Based on Multi-Objective Optimization. Journal of Deep Space Exploration, 2021, 8(2): 147‒153 https://doi.org/10.15982/j.issn.2096-9287.2021.20200069

References

[1] ZHOU H,WANG D W,WU B L,et al. Time-optimal reorientation for rigid satellite with reaction wheels[J]. International Journal of Control,2012,85(10):1452-1463
[2] WANG S,ZHAO L,CHENG J,et al. Task scheduling and attitude planning for agile earth observation satellite with intensive tasks[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology,2019,90(6):23-33
[3] SHE Y,LI S,ZHAO Y. Onboard mission planning for agile satellite using modified mixed-integer linear programming[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology,2018,72(11):204-216
[4] 程小军,崔祜涛,徐瑞,等. 几何约束下的航天器姿态机动控制[J]. 控制与决策,2012,27(5):724-730
CHENG X J,CUI H T,XU R,et al. Attitude maneuver control of spacecraft under geometric constraints[J]. Control and Decision,2012,27(5):724-730
[5] MCINNES C R. Large-angle slew maneuvers with autonomous Sun vector avoidance[J]. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics,1994,17(4):875-877
[6] SINGH G,MACALA G,WONG C E,et al. A constraint monitor algorithm for the Cassini spacecraft[C]//In Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance,Navigation,and Control Conference. [S.l.]:AIAA,1997.
[7] 仲维国,崔平远,崔祜涛. 航天器复杂约束姿态机动的自主规划[J]. 航空学报,2007,25(5):1091-1097
ZHONG W G,CUI P Y,CUI H T. Autonomous attitude maneuver planning for spacecraft under complex constraints[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2007,25(5):1091-1097
[8] KJELLBERG H C,LIGHTSEY E G. Discretized constrained attitude pathfinding and control for satellites[J]. Journal of Guidance,Control,and Dynamics,2013,36(5):1301-1309
[9] LAI L C,YANG C C,WU C J. Time-optimal maneuvering control of a rigid spacecraft[J]. Acta Astronautica,2007,60(10):791-800
[10] BOYARKO G A,ROMANO M,YAKIMENKO O A. Time-optimal reorientation of a spacecraft using a direct optimization method based on inverse dynamics[J]. Journal of Guidance,Control,and Dynamics,2011,34(4):1197-1208
[11] PANAGOU D. A distributed feedback motion planning protocol for multiple unicycle agents of different classes[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control,2017,62(3):1178-1193
[12] SEKHAVAT P,YAN H,FLEMING A,et al. Closed-loop time-optimal attitude maneuvering of magnetically actuated spacecraft[J]. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences,2011,58(1):81-97
[13] KIM Y,MESBAHI M,SINGH G,et al. On the convex parameterization of constrained spacecraft reorientation[J]. Aerospace & Electronic Systems IEEE Transactions,2010,46(3):1097-1109
[14] SPILLER D,MELTON R G,CURTI F. Inverse dynamics particle swarm optimization applied to constrained minimum-time maneuvers using reaction wheels[J]. Aerospace Science & Technology,2018,75(4):1-12
[15] WU C,XU R,ZHU S,et al. Time-optimal spacecraft attitude maneuver path planning under boundary and pointing constraints[J]. Acta Astronautica,2017,137(8):128-127
[16] FAHROO F,ROSS I M. Direct trajectory optimization by a chebyshev pseudospectral method[J]. Journal of Guidance,Control,and Dynamics,2002,25(1):160-166
[17] XIAO G,ZHU M. Direct trajectory optimization based on a mapped Chebyshev pseudospectral method[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics,2013(2):401-412
[18] CRAIN A,ULRICH S. Experimental validation of pseudo spectral based optimal trajectory planning for free-floating robots[J]. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics,2019,42(8):1-17
[19] MAGINOT J,GUENOV M,FANTINI P. A method for assisting the study of Pareto solutions in multi-objective optimization[C]//7th AIAA ATIO Conference. Belfast,Northern Ireland:AIAA,2007.
[20] ZHAO Q,HUANG H. Multi-objective optimization of zero propellant maneuver using hybrid programming[J]. Acta Astronautica,2015,116(12):154-160
PDF(910 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/