Key Technologies for Communications in Mars Entry Descent and Landing

Abstract

In light of the entry descent and landing flight in Chinese Mars exploration mission，this paper has analyzed the difficulties of this mission phase based on the characteristics of Mars atmosphere and terrain. All the past soft landing missions on Mars have been reviewed and the potential reasons for mission failure have been summarized. The communication architecture in Mars Science Laboratory has been introduced to illustrate all the potential communication methods. The key technologies include communication strategies for blackout，selection of signal modulation and high dynamic signal detection at low SNR. Finally，suggestions have been proposed for the implementation of EDL flight in Chinese Mars Exploration missions.

Keywords

EDL / high dynamic / blackout / direct-to-Earth communication / signal detection

References

[1] PRAKASH R，BURKHART P D，CHEN A，et al. Mars Science Laboratory Entry，Descent，and Landing System Overview[C]// Aerospace Conference. [S.l.]：IEEE，2008.
[2] BRAUN R D，MANNING R M. Mars exploration entry，descent and landing challenges[C]// Aerospace Conference. [S.l.]：IEEE，2006.
[3] CLERY D. Europe attempts Mars landing[J]. Scientific American,2016:1-8
[4] NASA. Viking1 Spacecraft[Z]. https://www.nasa.gov/50th/favpic/viking1.html，USA： NASA，2017.
[5] WOOD G E,ASMAR S W,REBOLD T A,et al. Mars Pathfinder EntryDescent,and Landing Communications[J]. Telecommunications & Data Acquisition Progress Report,1997,131:1-7
[6] DESAI P N,KNOCKE P C. Mars exploration rovers entry,descent,and landing trajectory analysis[J]. Journal of the Astronautical Sciences,2007,55(3):311-323
[7] PRINCE J，DESAI P，QUEEN E，et al. Mars Phoenix entry，descent，and landing simulation design and modeling analysis[C]//AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit. USA：AIAA，2013.
[8] WIKIPEDIA. Mars 2[Z]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_2, USA: Wiki Mars, 2018.
[9] ALBEE A，BATTEL S，BRACE R，et al. Report on the loss of the mars polar lander and Deep Space 2 Missions, Nasa Sti/recon Technical Report N[R]. USA: NASA，2000.
[10] WIKIPEDIA. Beagle 2[Z]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beagle_2, Wiki Mars, 2018.
[11] DAVIS N. Beagle 2: most detailed images yet of last Mars lander revealed[N]. The Guardian, 2016.
[12] FERRI F，AHONDAN A，COLOMBATTI G，et al. Atmospheric mars entry and landing investigations & analysis（AMELIA）by ExoMars 2016 Schiaparelli Entry Descent module：The ExoMars entry，descent and landing science[C]// IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Aerospace. [S.l.]：IEEE，2017：262-265.
[13] ABILLEIRA F，SHIDNER J. Entry，descent，and landing communications for the 2011 Mars Science Laboratory[C]// 2011 Mars Science Laboratory. USA.：[s.n.]，2012.
[14] SORIANO M，FINLEY S，FORT D，et al. Direct-to-Earth communications with Mars Science Laboratory during entry，descent，and landing[C]// Aerospace Conference. USA：IEEE，2013.
[15] MORABITO D D. The Spacecraft Communications Blackout Problem Encountered During Passage or Entry of Planetary Atmospheres[J]. Interplanetary Network Progress Report,2002:150-158
[16] SATORIUS E,ESTABROOK P,WILSON J,et al. Direct-to-Earth communications and signal processing for Mars exploration rover entry,descent,and landing[J]. Interplanetary Network Progress Report,2003,153:1-35
[17] CCSDS 211.0-B-5, Proximity-1 space link protocol—data link layer[S]. [S.l]:CCSOS, 2013.
[18] CCSDS 211.1-B-4, Proximity-1 space link protocol—physical layer[S]. [S.l]:CCSOS, 2013.
[19] CCSDS 211.2-B-2, Proximity-1 space link protocol—coding and synchronization sublayer[S]. [S.l]:CCSOS, 2013.
[20] PRESTON R A，ABRAHAM D S，DEUTSCH L J，et al. The Next Generation Deep Space Network：Meeting the Needs of Future Human and Robotic Space Exploration Missions[C]// IUFRO Landscape Ecology Conference. [S.l.]：IUFRO，2004.
[21] CHEN A，VASAVADA A，CIANCIOLO A，et al. Atmospheric risk assessment for the Mars Science Laboratory entry，descent，and landing system[C]// Aerospace Conference. USA：IEEE，2010.