Photon vs. proton radiation therapy in head and neck cancer: a review of dosimetric advantages and patient quality of life
Panagiota Kiafi , Marina Chalkia , Maria Anthi Kouri , Georgios Patatoukas , Nikolaos Kollaros , Andromachi Kougioumtzopoulou , Ourania Nikolatou-Galitis , Efthymios Kyrodimos , Christos Perisanidis , Vassilis Kouloulias , Kalliopi Platoni
Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment ›› 2024, Vol. 10 : 31
Photon vs. proton radiation therapy in head and neck cancer: a review of dosimetric advantages and patient quality of life
Radiotherapy (RT) is a cornerstone in the management of head and neck cancer (HNC), with the choice of RT type profoundly affecting patient outcomes, symptom severity, and quality of life (QoL). This review examines photon and proton RT types for HNC, focusing on dosimetric advantages, efficacy, and side effect profiles. Understanding these factors is crucial to minimizing adverse effects, enhancing QoL for patients, and effectively improving oncology’s clinical praxis. While photon-based therapies, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy, are widely used and effective, proton therapy, including intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and pencil beam scanning (PBS), offers distinct physical advantages. Photon therapies allow for precise dose distribution but often result in higher integral doses to surrounding healthy tissues. In contrast, protons enable highly conformal dose distributions with minimal exit dose beyond the target, a property that significantly reduces radiation exposure to organs at risk. Background research and comparative analysis demonstrate that proton therapy techniques, particularly IMPT and PBS, outperform photon-based methods in sparing critical structures and thus reducing acute and late treatment-related morbidities, such as xerostomia and dysphagia. As a consequence, patient-reported outcome measures and the overall QoL results suggest that proton therapies lead to better treatment results with fewer severe side effects and improved symptom management. In conclusion, proton therapy, particularly IMPT, shows promise as a treatment of choice for HNC, minimizing toxicities and enhancing QoL. However, continued research and evidence-based approaches are still essential to properly validate and refine proton therapy applications in HNC treatment paradigms and also effectively translate them into future clinical practice.
Radiation therapy (RT) / IMPT / PBS / IMRT / VMAT / head and neck cancer / patient quality of life / symptoms / toxicity / dosimetry
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
Sari S, Beduk Esen CS, Yazici G, Yuce D, Cengiz M, Ozyigit G. Do grape and black mulberry molasses have an effect on oral mucositis and quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer?.Support Care Cancer2022;30:327-36 |
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
der Laan HP, Van den Bosch L, Schuit E, Steenbakkers RJHM, van der Schaaf A, Langendijk JA. Impact of radiation-induced toxicities on quality of life of patients treated for head and neck cancer.Radiother Oncol2021;160:47-53 |
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |