Diagnostic accuracy of MRI and PET/CT for neck staging prior to salvage total laryngectomy
Jonas Galli , Roland Giger , Olgun Elicin , Martin Wartenberg , Lukas Anschuetz , Lluís Nisa
Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment ›› 2022, Vol. 8 : 48
Diagnostic accuracy of MRI and PET/CT for neck staging prior to salvage total laryngectomy
Aim: Lymph node (LN) metastases are associated with poor outcomes in patients with recurrent larynx squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). Neck dissection (ND) is therefore commonly performed along with salvage total laryngectomy (STL). Here, we assess the rate of occult LN metastases and the diagnostic value of MRI and PET/CT for detecting them in recurrent LSCC.
Methods: This retrospective study included patients with recurrent LSCC after primary (chemo)radiotherapy [(C)RT] who were re-staged by MRI and/or PET/CT and treated with STL and ND between 2004 and 2019. The histopathology of ND samples was used as the reference standard.
Results: Forty-one patients were included. The prevalence of occult metastases in MRI-negative and
Conclusion: Both MRI and PET/CT afforded good negative predictive values for nodal staging in patients with recurrent LSCC after (C)RT prior to STL. In selected patients, these radiological modalities, particularly PET/CT, could help to avoid unnecessary surgery to the neck and its associated morbidity.
Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma, recurrence, salvage total laryngectomy, re-staging / neck dissection, MRI, PET/CT, occult nodal metastasis
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
TNM classification of malignant tumours. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C, editors. 7th ed. Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, West Sussex, UK; Hoboken NJ, 2010. |
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |