Treatment strategy after the discontinuation of immunotherapy for head and neck cancer: a review

Tetsuro Wakasugi

Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment ›› 2023, Vol. 9 : 19

PDF
Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment ›› 2023, Vol. 9:19 DOI: 10.20517/2394-4722.2022.115
review-article

Treatment strategy after the discontinuation of immunotherapy for head and neck cancer: a review

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

First-line systemic therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is currently the mainstream treatment for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) that is not amenable to local therapy. However, the optimal treatment after discontinuation of ICIs is still unknown, and no large-scale analysis has been conducted in R/M SCCHN. In this narrative review, we summarize the treatment strategies available to continue ICI therapy using the currently available treatment modalities. After the administration of ICIs, unlike cytotoxic agents, the following responses are observed: durable response, pseudo-progressive disease, hyper-progressive disease, mixed response, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and improved sensitivity to subsequent chemotherapy. Some patients show a durable response to ICIs and a good prognosis; however, many patients will require salvage therapy. We need to select the subsequent treatment according to the various responses unique to ICIs to obtain a durable response. For instance, there are reports on the effectiveness of reapplication of local therapy for a mixed response, retreatment with ICIs, and off-treatment in responsive cases complicated by irAEs. If a durable response can be maintained with ICI therapy, a long-term prognosis that cannot be obtained with conventional chemotherapy can be achieved.

Keywords

Immune checkpoint inhibitors / squamous cell carcinoma / head and neck

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tetsuro Wakasugi. Treatment strategy after the discontinuation of immunotherapy for head and neck cancer: a review. Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment, 2023, 9: 19 DOI:10.20517/2394-4722.2022.115

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Burtness B,Greil R.Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study.Lancet2019;394:1915-28

[2]

Burtness B,Greil R.Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in KEYNOTE-048: subgroup analysis by programmed death ligand-1 combined positive score.J Clin Oncol2022;40:2321-32 PMCID:PMC9287281

[3]

National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Head and Neck Cancers. Version 1. 2022. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/head-and-neck.pdf [Last accessed on 17 May 2023]

[4]

Ferris RL,Fayette J.Nivolumab for recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck.N Eng J Med2016;375:1856-67 PMCID:PMC5564292

[5]

Vermorken JB,Rivera F.Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer.N Eng J Med2008;359:1116-27

[6]

Cohen EEW,Le Tourneau C.Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study.Lancet2019;393:156-67

[7]

Hamid O,Hosi FS.Five-year survival outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma treated with pembrolizumab in KEYNOTE-001.Ann Oncol2019;30:582-88 PMCID:PMC6503622

[8]

Larkin J,Gonzalez R.Five-year survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma.N Eng J Med2019;181:1535-46

[9]

Gettinger S,Jackman D.Five-year follow-up of nivolumab in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Results from the CA209-003 study.J Clin Oncol2018;36:1675-84.

[10]

Motzer RJ,George S.Nivolumab versus everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: updated results with long-term follow-up of the randomized, open-label, phase 3 CheckMate 025 trial.Cancer2020;126:4156-67. PMCID:PMC8415096

[11]

Ferris RL,Fayette J.Nivolumab vs investigator’s choice in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: 2-year long-term survival update of CheckMate 141 with analyses by tumor PD-L1 expression.Oral Oncol2018;81:45-51. PMCID:PMC6563923

[12]

Matsuo M,Masuda M.Five-year follow-up of patients with head and neck cancer treated with nivolumab and long-term responders for over two years.In Vivo2022;36:1881-6. PMCID:PMC9301402

[13]

Pons-Tostivint E,Vaflard P.Comparative analysis of durable responses on immune checkpoint inhibitors versus other systemic therapies: a pooled analysis of phase III trials.JCO Precis Oncol2019;3:1-10.

[14]

Gauci ML,Champiat S.Long-term survival in patients responding to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and disease outcome upon treatment discontinuation.Clin Cancer Res2019;25:946-956.

[15]

Jansen YJL,Mason R.Discontinuation of anti-PD-1 antibody therapy in the absence of disease progression or treatment limiting toxicity: clinical outcomes in advanced melanoma.Ann Oncol2019;30:1154-61

[16]

Sharma P,Wargo JA.Primary, adaptive, and acquired resistance to cancer immunotherapy.Cell2017;168:707-23 PMCID:PMC5391692

[17]

Jenkins RW,Flaherty KT.Mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors.Br J Cancer2018;118:9-16 PMCID:PMC5765236

[18]

Sato Y,Fujiwara YU.Efficacy of paclitaxel-based chemotherapy after progression on nivolumab for head and neck cancer.In Vivo2021;35:1211-15 PMCID:PMC8045096

[19]

Park SE,Ahn JS,Park K.Increased response rates to salvage chemotherapy administered after PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.J Thorac Oncol2018;13:106-11

[20]

Guigay J,Fayette J.Cetuximab, docetaxel, and cisplatin versus platinum, fluorouracil, and cetuximab as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (GORTEC 2014-01 TPExtreme): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial.Lancet Oncol2021;22:463-75

[21]

Borcoman E,Champiat S.Novel patterns of response under immunotherapy.Ann Oncol2019;30:385-96

[22]

Haddad R,Blumenschein G Jr.Nivolumab treatment beyond RECIST-defined progression in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in CheckMate 141: a subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial.Cancer2019;125:3208-18 PMCID:PMC6771504

[23]

Frelaut M,Borcoman E.Hyperprogression under immunotherapy.Int J Mol Sci2019;20:2674 PMCID:PMC6600249

[24]

Saâda-Bouzid E,Karabajakian A.Hyperprogression during anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Ann Oncol2017;28:1605-11

[25]

Harrington KJ,Greil R.KEYNOTE-048: progression after the next line of therapy following pembrolizumab (P) or P plus chemotherapy (P+C) vs EXTREME (E) as first-line (1L) therapy for recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).JCO2020;38:6505-6505

[26]

Thompson JA,Brahmer J.Management of immunotherapy-related toxicities, version 1.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology.J Natl Compr Cancer Netw2022;20:387-405

[27]

Schneider BJ,Santomasso BD.Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: ASCO guideline update.J Clin Oncol2021;39:4073-126

[28]

Saleh K,Martin N.Response to salvage chemotherapy after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.Eur J Cancer2019;121:123-9

[29]

Tahara M,Yokota T.Phase II trial of combination treatment with paclitaxel, carboplatin and cetuximab (PCE) as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CSPOR-HN02).Ann Oncol2018;29:1004-9

[30]

Tsakonas G,Kristensen CA.Randomized phase II study with cetuximab in combination with 5-FU and cisplatin or carboplatin vs. cetuximab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin for treatment of patients with relapsed or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CETMET Trial).Cancers2020;12:3110

[31]

Wakasaki T,Yasumatsu R.Effectiveness and safety of weekly paclitaxel and cetuximab as a salvage chemotherapy following immune checkpoint inhibitors for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter clinical study.PLoS One2022;17:e0271907 PMCID:PMC9333293

[32]

Wakasaki T,Masuda M.Prognostic biomarkers of salvage chemotherapy following nivolumab treatment for recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Cancers2020;12:2299

[33]

Fushimi C,Matsuki T.Salvage chemotherapy after nivolumab for recurrent or metastatic head and neck carcinoma.Anticancer Res2020;40:5277-83

[34]

Pestana RC,Rubin ML.Response rates and survival to systemic therapy after immune checkpoint inhibitor failure in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Oral Oncol2020;101:104523

[35]

Kurosaki T,Tanaka K.Safety and efficacy of cetuximab-containing chemotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a single-center retrospective study.Anticancer Drugs2021;32:95-101 PMCID:PMC7748051

[36]

Ueki Y,Ota H,Yamazaki K.Role of programmed death-ligand 1 in predicting the treatment outcome of salvage chemotherapy after nivolumab in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Head Neck2020;42:3275-81

[37]

Cabezas-Camarero S,Merino-Menéndez S.Safety and efficacy of cetuximab-based salvage chemotherapy after checkpoint inhibitors in head and neck cancer.Oncologist2021;26:e1018-35 PMCID:PMC8176971

[38]

Wakasugi T,Ohkubo JI.Retreatment with nivolumab for patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer.Acta Otolaryngol2022;142:206-12

[39]

Payne K,Beggs A.Circulating tumor DNA as a biomarker and liquid biopsy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Head Neck2018;40:1598-604

[40]

Li T,Wang H.Exosomes: potential biomarkers and functions in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Front Mol Biosci2022;9:881794 PMCID:PMC9237451

[41]

Takenaka Y,Takemoto N.Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic marker for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: meta-analysis.Head Neck2022;44:1237-45

[42]

Qian JM.Radiotherapy and immunotherapy for head and neck cancer: current evidence and challenges.Front Oncol2020;10:608772 PMCID:PMC7886974

[43]

Tsushima N,Fujisawa T.Salvage reconstructive surgery during nivolumab therapy for a patient with hypopharyngeal cancer.Clin Med Insights Case Rep2020;13:1179547620908854 PMCID:PMC7169354

[44]

Choi JS,Lovin BD.Abscopal effect following immunotherapy and combined stereotactic body radiation therapy in recurrent metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a report of two cases and literature review.Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol2020;129:517-22

[45]

Whiteside TL,Rodriguez-Ruiz ME,Melero I.Emerging opportunities and challenges in cancer immunotherapy.Clin Cancer Res2016;22:1845-55 PMCID:PMC4943317

[46]

Sharabi AB,DeWeese TL.Radiation and checkpoint blockade immunotherapy: radiosensitisation and potential mechanisms of synergy.Lancet Oncol2015;16:e498-509

[47]

Mohiuddin TM,Sheng W.Near infrared photoimmunotherapy: a review of recent progress and their target molecules for cancer therapy.Int J Mol Sci2023;24:2655 PMCID:PMC9916513

[48]

Dymova MA,Richter VA.Boron neutron capture therapy: current status and future perspectives.Cancer Commun2020;40:406-21 PMCID:PMC7494062

[49]

Yang K,Sun Z,Bai C.Retreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors: a systematic review.Ther Adv Med Oncol2020;12:1758835920975353 PMCID:PMC7705192

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

49

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/