Computational urbanism and the spatial evolution of Dashilar, Beijing, China

Feng Xu , Liu Xiao , Pingshan Qu , Weiwei Mao , Yuchen Zhu

Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism ›› 2025, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2) : 4056

PDF (7216KB)
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism ›› 2025, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2) : 4056 DOI: 10.36922/jcau.4056
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
research-article

Computational urbanism and the spatial evolution of Dashilar, Beijing, China

Author information +
History +
PDF (7216KB)

Abstract

Beijing’s urban development follows a cyclical pattern, reflecting its evolution from ancient dynasties to modern times and highlighting the challenges of balancing historic preservation with contemporary urban growth. The Qianmen Dashilar area in Beijing, China, rooted in the traditional hutong system, exemplifies these challenges and serves as a focal point for exploring strategies to harmonize heritage conservation with dynamic urban transformation. This article examines the evolution of the Dashilar area during the urbanization process, focusing on the transformation of its urban structures and courtyard houses. It aims to address the long-standing challenges of preservation and regeneration faced during the area’s urban transformation. To tackle these issues, the article proposes the use of computational methods to establish dynamic urban models based on modulated urban programs and crowd flow dynamics. By developing three computational urban prototypes - cell aggregation, mixed blocks, and node control - through site analysis and data collection, this study re-establishes the connection between the urban grid and urban programs while revitalizing courtyard spaces. These methodologies aim to balance the preservation of Dashilar’s traditional urban fabric with the diverse living demands arising from urban growth. In doing so, the article advocates for a multi-dimensional approach to safeguarding the area’s cultural and historical heritage while supporting its future urban regeneration and evolution.

Keywords

Urban regeneration / Design prototype / Evolution / Urban dynamic model / Computational urbanism

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Feng Xu, Liu Xiao, Pingshan Qu, Weiwei Mao, Yuchen Zhu. Computational urbanism and the spatial evolution of Dashilar, Beijing, China. Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, 2025, 7(2): 4056 DOI:10.36922/jcau.4056

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

References

[1]

Alexander C., Angel S., Fiksdah-King I., Ishikawa S., Jacobson M., & Siliverstein M. (1977). A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford University Press, p. 3-15.

[2]

Baek Y., & Zhang Y. (2021). Collaborative approaches to urban governance model of historic districts: A case study of the Yu’er Hutong project in Beijing. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 26(2):332-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2021.1879663

[3]

Ball P. (2001). The Self-Made Tapestry: Pattern Formation in Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 77-96.

[4]

Bentley P. J., & Corne D. W. (2002). An introduction to creative evolutionary systems. In: Creative Evolutionary Systems(The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Artificial Intelligence), San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, p. 1-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-155860673-9/50035-5

[5]

Che W., Cao Z., Shi Y., & Yu C.W. (2022). Renewal and upgrading of a courtyard building in the historic and cultural district of Beijing: Design concept of ‘multiple coexistence’ and a case study. Indoor and Built Environment, 31(2), 522-536. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X211010359

[6]

Chu Y. W. (2020). China’s new urbanization plan: Progress and structural constraints. Cities, 103, 102736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102736

[7]

Chung C. J., Inaba J., Koolhaas R., & Leong S. J. (2002). Great Leap Forward: Harvard Design School Project on the City. Köln: Taschen, p. 321-405.

[8]

Delanda M. (2016). Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, p. 108-114.

[9]

Deleuze G., & Guattari F. (1988). A Thousand Plateaus. London: Althlone, p. 92-98.

[10]

Jagutis M., Russell S., & Collier R. (2023). Flexible simulation of traffic with microservices, agents and REST. International Journal of Parallel, Emergent and Distributed Systems, 38(6), 490-506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445760.2023.2242183

[11]

Li N., Guo Z., Geng W., Li L., & Li Z. (2023). Design strategies for renovation of public space in Beijing’s traditional communities based on measured microclimate and thermal comfort. Sustainable Cities and Society, 99, 104927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104927

[12]

Maki F. (2009). Exploration of urban design language. In: Fumihiko Maki. United States: Phaidon, p. 17.

[13]

Mayne T. (2011). Combinatory Urbanism. Culver City: Stray Dog Cafe, p. 31-46.

[14]

Obrist H.U., Koolhaas R., Ota K., & Westcott J. (2011). Project Japan. Köln: Taschen, p. 188-194.

[15]

Pasquero C., & Poletto M. (2012). Systemic Architecture: Operating Manual for the Self-Organizing City. New York: Routledge, p. 81-97.

[16]

Reiser J., & Umemoto N. (2006). Atlas of Novel Tectonics. New York: Princeton, p. 26-31.

[17]

Rowe C., & Koetter F. (1978). Collage City. Cambridge: MIT Press, p. 77.

[18]

Rudofsky B. (1964). Architecture without Architects: A Short Introduction to Non-Pedigreed Architecture. New York: MOMA, p. 21-28.

[19]

Shen X., & Ye X. (2024). Environmental performance driven optimization of urban modular housing layout in Singapore. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2024.2314507

[20]

Thuer J.E.G., & Nam S.T. (2023). The collage of void versus solid: Ungers and Koolhaas: Void as a design element and theory. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 22(6):3338-3366. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2023.2205496

[21]

Verebes T. (2009). Experiments in associative urbanism. Architectural Design, 79:24-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.913

[22]

Verebes T. (2013). Masterplanning the Adaptive City. New York: Routledge, p. 7-18. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203428054

[23]

Yu S. (2017). Courtyard in conflict: The transformation of Beijing’s Siheyuan during revolution and gentrification. The Journal of Architecture, 22(8):1337-1365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2017.1394349

[24]

Zhang J., Wu D., Zhu A. X., & Zhu Y. (2023). Modelling urban expansion with cellular automata supported by urban growth intensity over time. Annals of GIS, 29(3):337-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2023.2181393

[25]

Zhao P. (2016). The disappearing historical hutongs: Key issues in preserving locality in old Beijing. In: F Wang, M Prominski. (eds). Urbanization and Locality. Berlin: Springer, p. 205-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48494-4_12

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (7216KB)

265

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/