Pragmatic strategies for enhancing the implementation of urban and spatial planning: A case study of Jinan, Shandong, China

Abstract

Efficient implementation of urban and spatial planning is essential for achieving sustainable urban growth. Nevertheless, various obstacles frequently arise, resulting in inconsistencies between planned objectives and their actual outcomes. This study focuses on pragmatic strategies to improve the implementation of urban and spatial planning, with Jinan, Shandong province, China, as a case study. By thoroughly analyzing existing challenges and prospective enhancements, the study aims to offer practical insights for improving the effectiveness and efficiency of planning initiatives in the city. Utilizing a combination of qualitative interviews, focus groups, and quantitative surveys, the study identifies significant barriers to implementation and explores viable solutions. By examining the experiences and viewpoints of diverse stakeholders involved in the planning process, the study offers targeted, practical recommendations tailored to Jinan’s unique context. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the challenges faced in urban planning implementation and offer valuable guidance for policymakers, planners, and practitioners striving to improve planning practices in Jinan and other regions.

Keywords

Urban planning / Spatial planning / Plan implementation / Jinan / Shandong / China

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

References

[1] Barossi-Filho M., Marzall K., Alves R. R., & Muller B. (2021). Planning implementation and participatory approaches: Analysis of Porto Alegre’s strategic plan ( 2014-2024). Habitat International, 117:102195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102195

[2] Campbell S. (1996). Green cities, growing cities, just cities?: Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3):296-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975696

[3] Chen Y., & Ong A. (2016). Chinese urbanism: The production of a new urban discourse. In M Douglass and J Friedmann (eds.), Cities for People, not For profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City. England, UK: Routledge, p. 95-118.

[4] Chen Y., Wu F., & Li Z. (2019). Informality and urban governance: Comparing Jinan and Guangzhou, China. Urban Studies, 56(1):107-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018776728

[5] Davidoff P. (1965). Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31(4):331-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366508978187

[6] Fainstein S. S., Campbell S., & Purcell M. (2019). The Just City. United States: Cornell University Press.

[7] Ginsburg N., & Koppel M. (2020). Planning in the Jewish state: From British colonial rule to the present. Israel Studies Review, 35(2):125-141. https://doi.org/10.3167/isr.2020.350207

[8] Grimm N. B., Faeth S. H., Golubiewski N. E., Redman C. L., Wu J., Bai X., & Briggs J. M. (2008). Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319(5864):756-760. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150195

[9] Healey P. (1997). Collaborative planning in perspective. Planning Theory, 12(2):177-191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095210366848

[10] Healey P. (2003). Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Canada: UBC Press.

[11] Innes J. E., & Booher D. E. (2003). Collaborative Governance for Sustainable Development. Vol. 69. Chicago: American Planning Association, p. 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360308976319

[12] Klopp J. M., & Petretta D. L. (2020). Planning for the resilience of public infrastructure systems: The case of the transportation sector. Journal of the American Planning Association, 86(1):62-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1680045

[13] Klöpp J., & Petretta D. L. (2020). Shaping Cities: Emerging Perspectives on Urban form and Policy. United States: University of California Press.

[14] Lindblom C. E. (1959). The science of “muddling through”. Public Administration Review, 19(2):79-88. https://doi.org/10.2307/973677

[15] Parker D., & Healey P. (2015). The European Union and planning: The case of structural funds and their implications for spatial planning. European Planning Studies, 23(3):567-586. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.877998

[16] Parker G., & Healey P. (2015). New Institutional Approaches to Urban Planning: Insights from British Cities. England, UK: Routledge.

[17] Pierre J., & Peters B. G. (2000). Governance, Politics, and the State. London: Macmillan International Higher Education.

[18] Roberts P., & Sykes H. (2000). Urban Regeneration: A Handbook. United States: SAGE Publications.

[19] Ward K., & Hardy S. (2019). Urban Theory: A Critical Introduction to Power, Cities and Urbanism in the 21^st entury. United States: SAGE Publications Limited.

[20] Wu F., & Webster C. J. (2020). Marginalization in Urban China: Comparative Perspectives. Germany: Springer.

[21] Yeh A. G., & Wu F. (2019). China’s Urban Transformation: A New Geography. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.