U-shaped relationship between guideline-directed medical therapy initiation timing and long-term adverse outcomes in acute heart failure

Huang Zhang , Li Zhu , Xinyuan Guo , Bowen Hou , Yali Hu , Xingyu Gao , Ying Cui , Yilin Zhao , Zhigang She , Lihua Zhu

The Journal of Cardiovascular Aging ›› 2026, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (3) : 26

PDF
The Journal of Cardiovascular Aging ›› 2026, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (3) :26 DOI: 10.20517/jca.2026.13
Original Research Article
U-shaped relationship between guideline-directed medical therapy initiation timing and long-term adverse outcomes in acute heart failure
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Aim: The early initiation of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) is significantly associated with clinical prognosis. However, the optimal timing for initiating GDMT in AHF patients requiring Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the association between the timing of GDMT initiation and prognosis in ICU patients with acute heart failure.

Methods: This study identified ICU-admitted AHF patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database and determined GDMT initiation timing based on clinical treatment context. Patients were categorized into three groups according to the timing of GDMT initiation. Primary endpoints were 1-year all-cause mortality and the composite endpoint of 1-year all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization. Cox proportional hazards regression and restricted cubic splines were utilized to elucidate the association between GDMT initiation timing and long-term adverse outcomes in patients with acute heart failure.

Results: A total of 7,002 patients were included in this study, of whom 4,260 (60.7%) received GDMT within one day after AHF onset. Compared to patients who initiated GDMT between one and four days, those who received GDMT within one day and those who received GDMT after four days had a higher composite risk of one-year all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization. The restricted cubic spline analysis demonstrated a U-shaped relationship between GDMT initiation timing and the primary outcome. The composite risk of one-year all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization decreased as GDMT initiation was delayed, reaching its lowest point around two days, after which the risk began to rise and eventually stabilized.

Conclusion: In critically ill acute heart failure patients, a nonlinear U-curve relationship emerged between GDMT initiation timing and all-cause mortality. The optimal therapeutic window diverges across patient subgroups defined by clinical characteristics, notably warranting individualized timing strategies - particularly in geriatric populations.

Keywords

Acute heart failure / guideline-directed medical therapy / intensive care unit / mortality / hemodynamic / geriatric populations / individualized treatment

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Huang Zhang, Li Zhu, Xinyuan Guo, Bowen Hou, Yali Hu, Xingyu Gao, Ying Cui, Yilin Zhao, Zhigang She, Lihua Zhu. U-shaped relationship between guideline-directed medical therapy initiation timing and long-term adverse outcomes in acute heart failure. The Journal of Cardiovascular Aging, 2026, 6 (3) : 26 DOI:10.20517/jca.2026.13

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Khan MS,Bennis A,Metra M.Global epidemiology of heart failure.Nat Rev Cardiol2024;21:717-34

[2]

Bui AL,Fonarow GC.Epidemiology and risk profile of heart failure.Nat Rev Cardiol2011;8:30-41 PMCID:PMC3033496

[3]

Yan T,Yin X.Burden, trends, and inequalities of heart failure globally, 1990 to 2019: a secondary analysis based on the global burden of disease 2019 study.J Am Heart Assoc2023;12:e027852 PMCID:PMC10111559

[4]

Feng J,Zhang J.Epidemiology and burden of heart failure in Asia.JACC Asia2024;4:249-64

[5]

Savarese G,Lund LH,Rosano GMC.Global burden of heart failure: a comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology.Cardiovasc Res2023;118:3272-87

[6]

2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019.Lancet2020;396:1204-22 PMCID:PMC7567026

[7]

Hollenberg SM,Ahmad T.2024 ACC expert consensus decision pathway on clinical assessment, management, and trajectory of patients hospitalized with heart failure focused update: a report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee.J Am Coll Cardiol2024;84:1241-67

[8]

Garg R,Bussmann WD.Overview of randomized trials of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure.JAMA1995;273:1450-6

[9]

Packer M,Armstrong PW.Comparative effects of low and high doses of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril, on morbidity and mortality in chronic heart failure. ATLAS Study Group.Circulation1999;100:2312-8

[10]

MERIT-HF Study Group. Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: metoprolol CR/XL randomised intervention trial in congestive heart failure (MERIT-HF).Lancet1999;353:2001-7

[11]

Hjalmarson A,Fagerberg B.Effects of controlled-release metoprolol on total mortality, hospitalizations, and well-being in patients with heart failure: the Metoprolol CR/XL randomized intervention trial in congestive heart failure (MERIT-HF). MERIT-HF Study Group.JAMA2000;283:1295-302

[12]

Pitt B,Remme WJ.The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators.N Engl J Med1999;341:709-17

[13]

Zannad F,Krum H.Eplerenone in patients with systolic heart failure and mild symptoms.N Engl J Med2011;364:11-21

[14]

McMurray JJV,Inzucchi SE.Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.N Engl J Med2019;381:1995-2008

[15]

McMurray JJ,Desai AS.Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure.N Engl J Med2014;371:993-1004

[16]

Bassi NS,Yancy CW.Association of optimal implementation of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor therapy with outcome for patients with heart failure.JAMA Cardiol2020;5:948-51 PMCID:PMC7203666

[17]

Biegus J,Collins SP.Impact of empagliflozin on decongestion in acute heart failure: the EMPULSE trial.Eur Heart J2023;44:41-50 PMCID:PMC9805406

[18]

Velazquez EJ,DeVore AD.Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in acute decompensated heart failure.N Engl J Med2019;380:539-48

[19]

Greene SJ,Albert NM.Medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the CHAMP-HF registry.J Am Coll Cardiol2018;72:351-66

[20]

Pierce JB,Fonarow GC.Contemporary use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor therapy among patients hospitalized for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in the US: the get with the guidelines-heart failure registry.JAMA Cardiol2023;8:652-61 PMCID:PMC10203967

[21]

Prins KW,Tyler JO,Duval S.Effects of beta-blocker withdrawal in acute decompensated heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JACC Heart Fail2015;3:647-53 PMCID:PMC4777602

[22]

Tran RH,Chang P.Guideline-directed medical therapy and survival following hospitalization in patients with heart failure.Pharmacotherapy2018;38:406-16

[23]

Bhagat AA,Vaduganathan M,Butler J.Initiation, continuation, switching, and withdrawal of heart failure medical therapies during hospitalization.JACC Heart Fail2019;7:1-12 PMCID:PMC8053043

[24]

Gilstrap LG,Desai AS.Initiation, continuation, or withdrawal of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and outcomes in patients hospitalized with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.J Am Heart Assoc2017;6 PMCID:PMC5523765

[25]

Fonarow GC,Albert NM.Influence of beta-blocker continuation or withdrawal on outcomes in patients hospitalized with heart failure: findings from the OPTIMIZE-HF program.J Am Coll Cardiol2008;52:190-9

[26]

McDonagh TA,Adamo M.2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: developed by the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.Eur J Heart Fail2022;24:4-131

[27]

Heidenreich PA,Aguilar D.2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Circulation2022;145:e895-e1032

[28]

McDonagh TA,Adamo M.2023 focused update of the 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: developed by the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.Eur J Heart Fail2024;26:5-17

[29]

Berg DD,Velazquez EJ.Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in high-risk patients in the PIONEER-HF trial.Circ Heart Fail2021;14:e007034 PMCID:PMC7908815

[30]

Mebazaa A,Chioncel O.Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies for acute heart failure (STRONG-HF): a multinational, open-label, randomised, trial.Lancet2022;400:1938-52

[31]

Johnson AEW,Shen L.MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset.Sci Data2023;10:1

[32]

Vincent JL,Takala J.The SOFA (sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the working group on sepsis-related problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.Intensive Care Med1996;22:707-10

[33]

Le Gall JR,Lemeshow S.The logistic organ dysfunction system. A new way to assess organ dysfunction in the intensive care unit. ICU Scoring Group.JAMA1996;276:802-10

[34]

Austin PC,Lee DS.Missing data in clinical research: a tutorial on multiple imputation.Can J Cardiol2021;37:1322-31 PMCID:PMC8499698

[35]

Roshani D.Comparing smoothing techniques for fitting the nonlinear effect of covariate in Cox models.Acta Inform Med2016;24:38-41 PMCID:PMC4789637

[36]

Joseph S,Abdullakutty J.The Cardiology Society of India-Kerala Acute Heart Failure Registry: poor adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy.Eur Heart J2021:ehab793

[37]

Cotter G,Davison B.Optimization of evidence-based heart failure medications after an acute heart failure admission: a secondary analysis of the STRONG-HF randomized clinical trial.JAMA Cardiol2024;9:114-24 PMCID:PMC10753435

[38]

Pagnesi M,Meiriño A.Blood pressure and intensive treatment up-titration after acute heart failure hospitalization: insights from the STRONG-HF trial.Eur J Heart Fail2024;26:638-51

[39]

Shoji S,Granger BB.Guideline-directed medical therapy after hospitalization for acute heart failure: insights from the CONNECT-HF.J Am Heart Assoc2024;13:e036998

[40]

Zheng J,Bhatt AS.Inpatient use of guideline-directed medical therapy during heart failure hospitalizations among community-based health systems.JACC Heart Fail2025;13:43-54

[41]

Farmakis D,Fountoulaki K.Rapid uptitration of guideline-directed medical therapies in acute heart failure with and without atrial fibrillation.JACC Heart Fail2024;12:1845-58

[42]

Ter Maaten JM,Davison B.Early changes in renal function during rapid up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapy following an admission for acute heart failure.Eur J Heart Fail2023;25:2230-42

[43]

Yang Z,Kan F.Association between the triglyceride glucose (TyG) index and the risk of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with heart failure: analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.Cardiovasc Diabetol2023;22:232 PMCID:PMC10472684

[44]

Li XH,Dong BB.Predicting 28-day all-cause mortality in patients admitted to intensive care units with pre-existing chronic heart failure using the stress hyperglycemia ratio: a machine learning-driven retrospective cohort analysis.Cardiovasc Diabetol2025;24:10 PMCID:PMC11714879

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉