Environmental life cycle assessment of hemp hurd-based biocomposites for packaging and mulch film applications

Abstract

This study evaluated the environmental performance of producing biocomposites (packaging and mulch films) from hemp hurd-based microfibers as a sustainable alternative to conventional plastics, with emphasis on the influence of end-of-life (EoL) scenarios in South Korea. Mechanical testing confirmed that the biocomposites exhibited mechanical properties comparable to those of fossil-based and reference materials, such as the tensile strength increase of ~20% and 33% for packaging and mulch films, respectively. At the same time, their enhanced biodegradability contributes to the improved carbon outcomes. Life cycle assessment (LCA) results showed that anaerobic digestion (AD) is the most favorable EoL scenario, yielding the lowest global warming potential (GWP). These benefits stem from credits associated with electricity generation from biogas and the use of digestate as a soil conditioner, mitigating 6.1 kg CO₂ per 1 kg of mulch film relative to current waste management practices in South Korea. The potential for carbon footprint reduction increased further with high microfiber content and the incorporation of biopolyesters during biocomposite manufacturing, saving up to 4.25 kg CO₂ per 1 kg of mulch film in both cases. Overall, the findings demonstrate that biobased composites provide robust environmental advantages under current conditions and are positioned to deliver even greater benefits as the energy system continues to decarbonize in South Korea. This work offers practical insights into sustainable production pathways and waste management strategies for emerging bioplastic systems, supporting their integration into a circular and low-carbon materials economy.

Keywords

Hemp hurd / Microfiber / Biocomposite film / End-of-life / Uncertainty / Sensitivity analysis

References

[1] Akinnawo, S.O., 2023. Eutrophication: causes, consequences, physical, chemical and biological techniques for mitigation strategies. Environ. Chall. 12, 100733.

[2] Al-Maharma, A.Y., Patil, S.P., Markert, B., 2022. Environmental impact analysis of plant fibers and their composites relative to their synthetic counterparts based on life cycle assessment approach. In: Rangappa, S.M., Puttegowda, M., Parameswaranpillai, J., Siengchin, S., Gorbatyuk, S. (Eds.), Advances in Bio-Based Fiber. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 741-781.

[3] Bahij, S., Omary, S., Feugeas, F., Faqiri, A., 2020. Fresh and hardened properties of concrete containing different forms of plastic waste: a review. Waste Manag. 113, 157-175.

[4] Bensadoun, F., Vanderfeesten, B., Verpoest, I., Van Vuure, A.W., Van Acker, K., 2016. Environmental impact assessment of end of life options for flax-MAPP composites. Ind. Crops Prod. 94, 327-341.

[5] Bishop, G., Styles, D., Lens, P.N.L., 2021. Environmental performance comparison of bioplastics and petrochemical plastics: a review of life cycle assessment (LCA) methodological decisions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 168, 105451.

[6] Broeren, M.L.M., Kuling, L., Worrell, E., Shen, L., 2017. Environmental impact assessment of six starch plastics focusing on wastewater-derived starch and additives. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 127, 246-255.

[7] Cerino, P., Buonerba, C., Cannazza, G., D’Auria, J., Ottoni, E., Fulgione, A., Di Stasio, A., Pierri, B., Gallo, A., 2021. A review of hemp as food and nutritional supplement. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 6, 19-27.

[8] Cheon, J., Ahn, Y., 2025. Advanced modeling of plastic recycling supply chain networks for emission reduction and sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 499, 145231.

[9] Choi, B., Yoo, S., Park, S.I., 2018. Carbon footprint of packaging films made from LDPE, PLA, and PLA/PBAT blends in South Korea. Sustainability 10, 2369.

[10] Deng, Y.L., Guo, Y.S., Wu, P., Ingarao, G., 2019. Optimal design of flax fiber reinforced polymer composite as a lightweight component for automobiles from a life cycle assessment perspective. J. Ind. Ecol. 23, 986-997.

[11] Deng, Y.L., Paraskevas, D., Tian, Y.J., Van Acker, K., Dewulf, W., Duflou, J.R., 2016. Life cycle assessment of flax-fibre reinforced epoxidized linseed oil composite with a flame retardant for electronic applications. J. Clean. Prod. 133, 427-438.

[12] Ekvall, T., Finnveden, G., 2001. Allocation in ISO 14041: a critical review. J. Clean. Prod. 9, 197-208.

[13] Farhat, R., Boyer, S.A.E., Burr, A., Batistella, M., Lopez-Cuesta, J.M., 2026. Eco-friendly conductive biopolymer nanocomposites and Life cycle assessment: a review. Clean. Environ. Syst. 20, 100383.

[14] Forfora, N., Azuaje, I., Kanipe, T., Gonzalez, J.A., Lendewig, M., Urdaneta, I., Venditti, R., Gonzalez, R., Argyropoulos, D., 2024. Are starch-based materials more eco-friendly than fossil-based? A critical assessment. Clean. Environ. Syst 13, 100177.

[15] Gaete-Morales, C., Gallego-Schmid, A., Stamford, L., Azapagic, A., 2019. Life cycle environmental impacts of electricity from fossil fuels in Chile over a ten-year period. J. Clean. Prod. 232, 1499-1512.

[16] Giordano, C.R., Van Brunt, M.E., Halevi, S.J., Castaldi, M.J., Orlovits, Z., Illes, Z., 2024. Landfill gas collection efficiency: categorization of data from existing in-situ measurements. Waste Manag. 175, 83-91.

[17] González-García, S., Hospido, A., Feijoo, G., Moreira, M.T., 2010. Life cycle assessment of raw materials for non-wood pulp mills: hemp and flax. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 54, 923-930.

[18] Guan, Q.F., Yang, H.B., Han, Z.M., Ling, Z.C., Yang, K.P., Yin, C.H., Yu, S.H., 2021. Plant cellulose nanofiber-derived structural material with high-density reversible interaction networks for plastic substitute. Nano Lett. 21, 8999-9004.

[19] Gupta, A., Lolic, L., Mekonnen, T.H., 2022. Reactive extrusion of highly filled, compatibilized, and sustainable PHBV/PBAT-Hemp residue biocomposite. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 156, 106885.

[20] Hermann, B.G., Debeer, L., De Wilde, B., Blok, K., Patel, M.K., 2011. To compost or not to compost: carbon and energy footprints of biodegradable materials’ waste treatment. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 96, 1159-1171.

[21] Hervy, M., Evangelisti, S., Lettieri, P., Lee, K.Y., 2015. Life cycle assessment of nanocellulose-reinforced advanced fibre composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 118, 154-162.

[22] Hottle, T.A., Bilec, M.M., Landis, A.E., 2017. Biopolymer production and end of life comparisons using life cycle assessment. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 122, 295-306.

[23] Houssini, K., Li, J.H., Tan, Q.Y., 2025. Complexities of the global plastics supply chain revealed in a trade-linked material flow analysis. Commun. Earth Environ. 6, 257.

[24] Huang, S.R., Dong, Q.H., Che, S.C., Li, R.H., Tang, K.H.D., 2025. Bioplastics and biodegradable plastics: a review of recent advances, feasibility and cleaner production. Sci. Total Environ. 969, 178911.

[25] Islam, M., Xayachak, T., Haque, N., Lau, D., Bhuiyan, M., Pramanik, B.K., 2024. Impact of bioplastics on environment from its production to end-of-life. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 188, 151-166.

[26] Jang, Y.C., Lee, G., Kwon, Y., Lim, J.H., Jeong, J.H., 2020. Recycling and management practices of plastic packaging waste towards a circular economy in South Korea. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 158, 104798.

[27] Jung, S., Jung, H., Ahn, Y., 2024. Plastic-to-energy: process and economic-environmental assessment of a recycling technology. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 183, 1051-1058.

[28] Khoo, H.H., Tan, R.B.H., 2010. Environmental impacts of conventional plastic and bio-based carrier bags: part 2: end-of-life options. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 15, 338-345.

[29] Khouri, N.G., Bahú, J.O., Blanco-Llamero, C., Severino, P., Concha, V.O.C., Souto, E.B., 2024. Polylactic acid (PLA): properties, synthesis, and biomedical applications: a review of the literature. J. Mol. Struct. 1309, 138243.

[30] Kord, B., 2012. Effect of nanoparticles loading on properties of polymeric composite based on hemp fiber/polypropylene. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 25, 793-806.

[31] Kumar, C.M.P., Ashok, R.B, Kumar, M., C P, R., 2022. Natural nano-fillers materials for the bio-composites: a review. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 99, 100715.

[32] La Rosa, A.D., Cozzo, G., Latteri, A., Recca, A., Björklund, A., Parrinello, E., Cicala, G., 2013. Life cycle assessment of a novel hybrid glass-hemp/thermoset composite. J. Clean. Prod. 44, 69-76.

[33] Lan, K., Zhang, B.Q., Yao, Y., 2022. Circular utilization of urban tree waste contributes to the mitigation of climate change and eutrophication. One Earth 5, 944-957.

[34] Le Duigou, A., Baley, C., 2014. Coupled micromechanical analysis and life cycle assessment as an integrated tool for natural fibre composites development. J. Clean. Prod. 83, 61-69.

[35] Luo, C.K., Zhou, Y., Chen, Z.T., Bian, X.C., Chen, N., Li, J.J., Wu, Y.F., Yang, Z.F., 2024. Comparative life cycle assessment of PBAT from fossil-based and second-generation generation bio-based feedstocks. Sci. Total Environ. 954, 176421.

[36] Molina-Besch, K., 2022. Use phase and end-of-life modeling of biobased biodegradable plastics in life cycle assessment: a review. In: Araujo, O.Q.F. (Ed.), Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, Stuhrbaum, pp. 3253-3272.

[37] Pöschl, M., Ward, S., Owende, P., 2010. Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways. Appl. Energy 87, 3305-3321.

[38] Poveda-Giraldo, J.A., Yoo, S., Yoo, S., Kim, I., Lan, K., Venditti, R., Park, S., 2025. Environmental life cycle assessment of renewable starch alternative plastic: a comparative analysis of end-of-life scenarios in the Republic of Korea. J. Clean. Prod. 520, 146178.

[39] Qi, Y.P., He, P.J., Lan, D.Y., Lü, F., Zhang, H., 2025. Novel method for predicting concentrations of incineration flue gas based on waste composition and machine learning. J. Environ. Manag. 373, 123588.

[40] Ramachandran, K., Gnanasagaran, C.L., Vekariya, A., 2023. Life cycle assessment of carbon fiber and bio-fiber composites prepared via vacuum bagging technique. J. Manuf. Process. 89, 124-131.

[41] Ramesh, P., Vinodh, S., 2020. State of art review on life cycle assessment of polymers. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 13, 411-422.

[42] Ratshoshi, B.K., Farzad, S., Görgens, J.F., 2024. A techno-economic study of polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT) production from molasses in an integrated sugarcane biorefinery. Food Bioprod. Process. 145, 11-20.

[43] Raza, M.Y., Chen, Y.C., 2025. Nuclear energy consumption, low-carbon transition and factor productivity in South Korea. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 57, 103315.

[44] Rehm, T.E., 2023. Advanced nuclear energy: the safest and most renewable clean energy. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 39, 100878.

[45] Roy, P., Defersha, F., Rodriguez-Uribe, A., Misra, M., Mohanty, A.K., 2020. Evaluation of the life cycle of an automotive component produced from biocomposite. J. Clean. Prod. 273, 123051.

[46] Saibuatrong, W., Cheroennet, N., Suwanmanee, U., 2017. Life cycle assessment focusing on the waste management of conventional and bio-based garbage bags. J. Clean. Prod. 158, 319-334.

[47] Schrijvers, D.L., Leroux, F., Verney, V., Patel, M.K., 2014. Ex-ante life cycle assessment of polymer nanocomposites using organo-modified layered double hydroxides for potential application in agricultural films. Green Chem. 16, 4969-4984.

[48] Sim, J.W., Lee, H., Jo, S., Oh, S., Kim, S., Kim, D.R., 2023. Increasing energy saving of pilot-scale spray dryers with enhanced yield by low-adhesive surfaces. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 49, 103218.

[49] Sommerhuber, P.F., Wenker, J.L., Rüter, S., Krause, A., 2017. Life cycle assessment of wood-plastic composites: analysing alternative materials and identifying an environmental sound end-of-life option. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 117, 235-248.

[50] Tan, Q.Y., Yang, L.Y., Wei, F., Chen, Y., Li, J.H., 2023. Comparative life cycle assessment of polyethylene agricultural mulching film and alternative options including different end-of-life routes. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 178, 113239.

[51] Torres, M., Srubar, W.V., 2025. Characterizing statistical uncertainty and variability of building material emissions in probabilistic whole-building life cycle assessment using kernel density estimation. Build. Environ. 284, 113442.

[52] Voglhuber-Slavinsky, A., Zicari, A., Smetana, S., Moller, B., Dönitz, E., Vranken, L., Zdravkovic, M., Aganovic, K., Bahrs, E., 2022. Setting life cycle assessment (LCA) in a future-oriented context: the combination of qualitative scenarios and LCA in the agri-food sector. Eur. J. Futur. Res. 10, 15.

[53] Wang, B.X., Cortes-Peña, Y., Grady, B.P., Huber, G.W., Zavala, V.M., 2024. Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of the production of biodegradable polyaliphatic-polyaromatic polyesters. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 12, 9156-9167.

[54] Xiong, L., Li, Z.J., Shah, F., Wang, P., Yuan, Q.H., Wu, W., 2024. Biodegradable mulch film enhances the environmental sustainability compared with traditional polyethylene film from multidimensional perspectives. Chem. Eng. J. 492, 152219.

[55] Xu, G.Y., Wang, Y.T., Rehman, H., 2023. The future trajectory of carbon emissions in the process of carbon neutrality in South Korea. J. Environ. Manag. 345, 118588.

[56] Yi, S., 2019. Resource recovery potentials by landfill mining and reclamation in South Korea. J. Environ. Manag. 242, 178-185.

[57] Yumitro, G., Oktaviani, S., Deniar, S.M., 2024. How South Korea’s waste management system becomes a model for the world: what Indonesia can learn from South Korea’s experience. Commun. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 4, 22-28.

[58] Zheng, L., Kim, M.S., Xu, S., Urgun-Demirtas, M., Huber, G.W., Klier, J., 2023. Biodegradable high-molecular-weight poly(pentylene adipate-co-terephthalate): synthesis, thermo-mechanical properties, microstructures, and biodegradation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 11, 13885-13895.