Performance-Based Topology Optimization of Main Steel Girders in Composite Bridges with Multi-Criteria Environmental Sustainability Evaluation

Abstract

The rising need for economical and ecologically friendly bridges calls for practical solutions that do not compromise the strength, utility, and safety of the structures. The steel-concrete bridge system uses steel girders that carry most of the weight. Thus, an optimal arrangement of girders is necessary for structural efficiency and economic advantage. This study investigates the structural optimization of steel main girders for composite bridges to obtain optimum structural weight and economy. To investigate the coupled behavior of steel girders and concrete decks under realistic conditions, Finite Element Modeling (FEM) is used. In this approach, alternative sizes or configurations for the steel girder are evaluated to predict tensile and compressive stresses as well as deflections. This involves a comparison between the material savings and cost benefits of optimized or conventional designs/configurations. The optimization approaches used in designing composite bridges seem effective at reducing steel mass without affecting bridge performance in terms of stresses and deflections. This study shows that cross-sectional and topology optimization result in a bridge that is more economical, using less steel than previous bridges. Optimization techniques are suggested for designing and building bridges, especially large-scale projects, because of their importance in providing cost-effective and energy-efficient solutions.

Keywords

Structural design / Design constraints / Evolutionary algorithms / Sustainable design / Environmental design / Material efficiency / Optimization

References

[1] Srisomporn S, Bureerat S. Geometrical Design of Plate-Fin Heat Sinks Using Hybridization of MOEA and RSM. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol. 2008, 31, 351-360. DOI: 10.1109/TCAPT.2008.916799

[2] Zitzler E, Thiele L. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 1999, 3, 257-271. DOI: 10.1109/4235.797969

[3] Maute K, Frangopol DM. Reliability-based design of MEMS mechanisms by topology optimization. Comput. Struct. 2003, 81, 813-824. DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7949(03)00008-7

[4] Wang Y, Yao Y, Chen L, Zhang L. Enhanced mechanical properties of 3D printed composites via continuous metal fiber reinforcement and process parameter optimization. Addit. Manuf. 2026, 120, 105144. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2026.105144

[5] Zhu J, Zhou H, Wang C, Zhou L, Yuan S, Zhang W. A review of topology optimization for additive manufacturing: Status and challenges. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2021, 34, 91-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2020.09.020

[6] Sigmund O. Topology optimization: A tool for the tailoring of structures and materials. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2000, 358, 211-227. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2000.0528

[7] Bendsøe MP, Kikuchi N. Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 1988, 71, 197-224. DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2

[8] Andreassen E, Clausen A, Schevenels M, Lazarov BS, Sigmund O. Efficient topology optimization in MATLAB using 88 lines of code. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 2011, 43, 1-16. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-010-0594-7

[9] Liu S, Li Q, Liu J, Chen W, Zhang Y. A Realization Method for Transforming a Topology Optimization Design into Additive Manufacturing Structures. Engineering 2018, 4, 277-285. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2017.09.002

[10] EN 1993-1-1; Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures-Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings . European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2005.

[11] Plevris V, Almutairi A, Rios AJ. Advancing Sustainability Through Structural Optimization: Innovations in Material Efficiency and Environmental Impact Reduction. In The 1st International Conference on Net-Zero Built Environment; Kioumarsi M, Shafei B, Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2025; pp. 1611-1623.

[12] Xie W, Xia Q, Yu Q, Li Y. An effective phase field method for topology optimization without the curvature effects. Comput. Math. Appl. 2023, 146, 200-212. DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2023.06.037

[13] Muayad H, Raffaele C, Marco D, Hamed F, Movahedi Rad M. Thermo-mechanical reliability-based topology optimization for imperfect elasto-plastic materials. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 2025, 21, 1755-1776. DOI: 10.1007/s10999-025-09799-9

[14] Habashneh M, Movahedi Rad M. Plastic-limit probabilistic structural topology optimization of steel beams. Appl. Math. Model. 2024, 128, 347-369. DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2024.01.029

[15] Wu J, Sigmund O, Groen JP. Topology optimization of multi-scale structures: A review. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 2021, 63, 1455-1480. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-021-02881-8

[16] Dzierżanowski G. On the comparison of material interpolation schemes and optimal composite properties in plane shape optimization. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 2012, 46, 693-710. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-012-0788-2

[17] Lógó J, Ismail H. Milestones in the 150-Year History of Topology Optimization: A Review. Comput. Assist. Methods Eng. Sci. 2020, 27, 97-132. Available online: https://re.public.polimi.it/handle/11311/1190020 (accessed on 23 May 2026).

[18] Chamatidis I, Stoumpos M, Kazakis G, Kallioras NA, Triantafyllou S, Plevris V, et al. Overview on Machine Learning Assisted Topology Optimization Methodologies. In Machine Learning in Modeling and Simulation: Methods and Applications ; Rabczuk T, Bathe K-J, Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 373-394. ISBN 978-3-031-36644-4

[19] Dorn WS, Gomory RE, Greenberg HJ. Automatic Design of Optimal Structures. 1964. Available online: https://www.sid.ir/paper/596045/en (accessed on 23 May 2026).

[20] Rozvany GIN, Zhou M, Birker T. Generalized shape optimization without homogenization. Struct. Optim. 1992, 4, 250-252. DOI: 10.1007/BF01742754

[21] Tang T, Wang L, Zhu M, Zhang H, Dong J, Yue W, et al. Topology Optimization: A Review for Structural Designs Under Statics Problems. Materials 2024, 17, 5970. DOI: 10.3390/ma17235970

[22] Shin S, Shin D, Kang N. Topology optimization via machine learning and deep learning: A review. J. Comput. Des. Eng. 2023, 10, 1736-1766. DOI: 10.1093/jcde/qwad072

[23] Liu S, Li Q, Hu J, Chen W, Zhang Y, Luo Y, et al. A Survey of Topology Optimization Methods Considering Manufacturable Structural Feature Constraints for Additive Manufacturing Structures. Addit. Manuf. Front. 2024, 3, 200143. DOI: 10.1016/j.amf.2024.200143

[24] Sigmund O, Maute K. Topology optimization approaches. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 2013, 48, 1031-1055. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-013-0978-6

[25] Deaton JD, Grandhi RV. A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization: Post 2000. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 2014, 49, 1-38. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-013-0956-z

[26] Papadrakakis M, Lagaros ND, Tsompanakis Y, Plevris V. Large scale structural optimization: Computational methods and optimization algorithms. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2001, 8, 239-301. DOI: 10.1007/BF02736645

[27] Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O. Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods, and Applications ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013.

[28] Martínez-Muñoz D, Martí JV, Yepes V. Steel‐Concrete Composite Bridges: Design, Life Cycle Assessment, Maintenance, and Decision‐Making. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020, 2020, 8823370. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8823370

[29] Li L, Khandelwal K. Volume preserving projection filters and continuation methods in topology optimization. Eng. Struct. 2015, 85, 144-161. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.052

[30] Svanberg K. The method of moving asymptotes-A new method for structural optimization. Numer. Meth Eng. 1987, 24, 359-373. DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620240207

[31] Guest JK, Prévost JH, Belytschko T. Achieving minimum length scale in topology optimization using nodal design variables and projection functions. Numer. Meth Eng. 2004, 61, 238-254. DOI: 10.1002/nme.1064

[32] Ranzi G, Dall’Asta A, Ragni L, Zona A. A geometric nonlinear model for composite beams with partial interaction. Eng. Struct. 2010, 32, 1384-1396. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.01.017

[33] Katwal U, Tao Z, Hassan MK. Finite element modelling of steel-concrete composite beams with profiled steel sheeting. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2018, 146, 1-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.03.011

[34] Luo Z, Wang S, Wang J, Yuan H. Research on flexural performance of composite girders with different shear connection degrees. Structures 2025, 77, 109144. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2025.109144

[35] Skoglund O, Leander J, Karoumi R. Optimizing the steel girders in a high strength steel composite bridge. Eng. Struct. 2020, 221, 110981. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110981

[36] Jia J. Static Analysis and Optimization Design of Bridge Structures under Different Load Conditions. SHS Web Conf. 2024, 196, 03009. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/202419603009

[37] Jankowski R, Manguri A, Hassan H, Saeed N. Topology, Size, and Shape Optimization in Civil Engineering Structures: A Review. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 2025, 142, 933-971. DOI: 10.32604/cmes.2025.059249

[38] Baandrup M, Sigmund O, Aage N. Structural topology optimization of bridge girders in cable supported bridges. In IABSE Conference: Engineering the Developing World ; International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering: Zurich, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 975-982.

[39] Martins JP, Correia J, Ljubinković F, Simões da Silva L. Cost optimisation of steel I-girder cross-sections using genetic algorithms. Structures 2023, 55, 379-388. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.06.030

[40] Xue C, Fan Z, Wu F, Liu L, He L, Cui X. Research on the Shear Behaviour of Composite Shear Connectors. Buildings 2022, 12, 1726. DOI: 10.3390/buildings12101726

[41] Kaveh A, Ghazaan MI. Meta-Heuristic Algorithms for Optimal Design of Real-Size Structures ; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018.

[42] Hassanzadeh A, Moradi S, Burton HV. Performance-Based Design Optimization of Structures: State-of-the-Art Review. J. Struct. Eng. 2024, 150, 03124001. DOI: 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-13542

[43] Tormen AF, Pravia ZM, Ramires FB, Kripka M. Optimization of Steel-Concrete Composite Beams Considering Cost and Environmental Impact. Steel Compos. Struct. 2022, 34, 409-421. DOI: 10.12989/scs.2020.34.3.409

[44] Symons K. Book review: Embodied Carbon: The Inventory of Carbon and Energy (ICE). A BSRIA Guide. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Energy 2011, 164, 206- 206. DOI: 10.1680/ener.2011.164.4.206

[45] Nuss P, Eckelman MJ. Life Cycle Assessment of Metals: A Scientific Synthesis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e101298. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101298

[46] Robati M, Oldfield P, Nezhad AA, Carmichael DG, Kuru A. Carbon value engineering: A framework for integrating embodied carbon and cost reduction strategies in building design. Build. Environ. 2021, 192, 107620. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107620