The Jevons Paradox and Vernon’s Product Life Cycle: Evidence from Primary-Secondary Price Differentials in Copper and Aluminium (2002-2021) with 2024-2025 Market Context

Antonio Alonso-Jimenez , Manuel Regueiro y González-Barros , Enrique Álvarez , Luis Alonso Castillo

Intell. Sustain. Manuf. ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 10035

PDF (1060KB)
Intell. Sustain. Manuf. ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) :10035 DOI: 10.70322/ism.2025.10035
Article
research-article
The Jevons Paradox and Vernon’s Product Life Cycle: Evidence from Primary-Secondary Price Differentials in Copper and Aluminium (2002-2021) with 2024-2025 Market Context
Author information +
History +
PDF (1060KB)

Abstract

This study examines how efficiency improvements associated with Jevons’ Paradox and product-system maturation, as described by Vernon’s Product Life Cycle (PLC), jointly influence the long-term pricing relationship between primary and recycled copper and aluminium. Using author-provided nominal annual USD price series for 2002-2021, the analysis derives descriptive indicators most notably the recycled-to-primary (R/P) price ratio to characterize structural shifts consistent with PLC-driven secondary integration. Recent market conditions in 2024-2025, including tight physical availability, low inventories, regional premia, and recurrent episodes of backwardation, are incorporated as qualitative context without merging with the historical dataset. Results indicate a sustained narrowing of R/P discounts for both metals by 2021. The combined Jevons-PLC interpretation suggests that efficiency-driven service expansion and supply-side tightness increase the relative value of secondary material, supporting long-term convergence between primary and recycled streams.

Keywords

Jevons paradox / Vernon product life cycle / Copper / Aluminum / Recycling / Circular economy / Rebound effect / Resource efficiency

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Antonio Alonso-Jimenez, Manuel Regueiro y González-Barros, Enrique Álvarez, Luis Alonso Castillo. The Jevons Paradox and Vernon’s Product Life Cycle: Evidence from Primary-Secondary Price Differentials in Copper and Aluminium (2002-2021) with 2024-2025 Market Context. Intell. Sustain. Manuf., 2026, 3(1): 10035 DOI:10.70322/ism.2025.10035

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Statement of the Use of Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies in the Writing Process

During the preparation of this manuscript, the author used ChatGPT and Manus in order to support the translation into English and stylistic refinement of the text. After using these tools, the author reviewed and edited the content as needed and takes full responsibility for the content of the published article.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A.-J. and M.R.y.G.-B.; Methodology, A.A.-J.; Software, E.Á.; Validation, A.A.-J., M.R.y.G.-B. and E.Á.; Formal Analysis, A.A.-J.; Investigation, A.A.-J. and E.Á.; Resources, M.R.y.G.-B.; Data Curation, E.Á. and A.A.-J.; Writing Original Draft Preparation, A.A.-J.; Writing Review & Editing, M.R.y.G.-B., E.Á. and L.A.-C.; Visualization, E.Á. and A.A.-J.; Supervision, M.R.y.G.-B.; Project Administration, A.A.-J.; Funding Acquisition, Not applicable.

Ethics Statement

This study uses an author-provided historical price dataset and publicly referenced market context; no human or animal subjects were involved.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The 2002-2021 price table is author-provided and reproducible from the manuscript’s figures. 2024-2025 indicators are descriptive references to exchange tables and reputable newswire reports.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

[1]

Arrobas DLP, Drexhage JR, Hund KL, Mccormick MS, Ningthoujam J. The Growing Role of Minerals and Metals for a Low Carbon Future; World Bank Group: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. Availableonline:https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/207371500386458722(accessedon1cotober2025).

[2]

Allwood JM, Cullen JM, Milford RL. Options for achieving a 50% cut in industrial carbon emissions by 2050. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 1888-1894. doi:10.1021/es902909k.

[3]

Saevarsdottir G, Kvande H, Welch BJ. Aluminum Production in the Times of Climate Change: The Global Challenge to Reduce the Carbon Footprint and Prevent Carbon Leakage. JOM 2020, 72, 296-308. doi:10.1007/s11837-019-03918-6.

[4]

International Aluminium Institute (IAI). Aluminium Sector Greenhouse Gas Pathways to 2050. 2022. Available online: https://www.world-aluminium.org (accessed on 1 October 2025).

[5]

Regueiro M, Alonso-Jiménez A. Minerals in the future of Europe. Miner. Econ. 2021, 34, 209-224. doi:10.1007/s13563-021-00254-7.

[6]

International Copper Study Group (ICSG).Copper Bulletin 2023; ICSG: Lisbon, Portugal, 2023. Available online: https://www.icsg.org (accessed on 1 October 2025).

[7]

Hertwich EG, Ali S, Ciacci L, Fishman T, Heeren N, Masanet E, et al. Material efficiency strategies to reducing greenhouse gas emissions associated with buildings, vehicles, and electronics—A review. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 043004. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab0fe3.

[8]

Hotelling H. The economics of exhaustible resources. J. Political Econ. 1931, 39, 137-175. doi:10.1086/254195.

[9]

Tabereaux AT, Peterson RD. Aluminum production. In Treatise on Process Metallurgy, 2nd ed.; Seetharaman S, Guthrie R, McLean A, Seetharaman S, Sohn HY,Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024, pp. 625-676.

[10]

Haas W, Krausmann F, Wiedenhofer D, Heinz M. How circular is the global economy? An assessment of material flows, waste production, and recycling in the European Union and the world in 2005. J. Ind. Ecol. 2015, 19, 765-777. doi:10.1111/jiec.12244.

[11]

Regueiro González-Barros M, Espí JA. The returns on mining exploration investments. Boletín Geológico y Minero 2019, 130, 161-180. doi:10.21701/bolgeomin.130.1.010.

[12]

Alonso-Jiménez A. The Paradox of the Circular Economy in the Raw Materials Industry. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Life Cycle Management ( LCM 2021), Stuttgart, Germany, 5-8 September 2021; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2022; Volume 349, p. 1003. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/20213491003.

[13]

Jevons WS. The Coal Question: An Inquiry Concerning the Progress of the Nation, and the Probable Exhaustion of Our Coal-Mines; Macmillan: London, UK, 1865.

[14]

Khazzoom JD. Economic implications of mandated efficiency in standards for household appliances. Energy J. 1980, 1, 21-40. doi:10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol1-No4-2.

[15]

Brookes L. The greenhouse effect: The fallacies in the energy efficiency solution. Energy Policy 1990, 18, 199-201. doi:10.1016/0301-4215(90)90145-T.

[16]

Henly J, Ruderman H. Energy saving from the adoption of more efficient appliances: another view. Energy J. 1988, 9, 155-170.

[17]

Saunders HD. The Khazzoom-Brookes postulate and neoclassical growth. Energy J. 1992, 13, 131-148. doi:10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol13-No4-7.

[18]

Saunders HD. A view from the macro side: Rebound, backfire, and Khazzoom-Brookes. Energy Policy 2000, 28, 439-449. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00024-0.

[19]

Binswanger M. Technological progress and sustainable development: What about the rebound effect? Ecol. Econ. 2001, 36, 119-132. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00214-7.

[20]

Hertwich EG. Consumption and the rebound effect: An industrial ecology perspective. J. Ind. Ecol. 2008, 9, 85-98. doi:10.1162/1088198054084635.

[21]

Font Vivanco D, van der Voet E. The rebound effect through industrial ecology’s eyes: A review of LCA-based studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2014, 19, 1933-1947. doi:10.1007/s11367-014-0802-6.

[22]

Zink T, Geyer R. Circular economy rebound. J. Ind. Ecol. 2017, 21, 593-602. doi:10.1111/jiec.12545.

[23]

Vernon R. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Q. J. Econ. 1966, 80, 190-207. doi:10.2307/1880689.

[24]

Alcott B. Jevons’ paradox. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 54, 9-21. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.020.

[25]

OECD. Global Material Resources Outlook to 2060: Economic Drivers and Environmental Consequences; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2019. doi:10.1787/9789264307452-en.

[26]

U.S.Geological Survey (USGS). Mineral Commodity Summaries 2021; U.S. Department of the Interior: Washington, DC, USA, 2021. Available online: https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2021/mcs2021.pdf (accessed on 1 October 2025).

[27]

Grand View Research. Metal Recycling Market: Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report by Metal Type (Ferrous, Non-Ferrous), by End Use (Automotive, Construction, Shipbuilding, Equipment Manufacturing, Consumer Appliances), by Region, and Segment Forecasts, 2025-2030; Grand View Research: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2021. Available online: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/metal-recycling-market (accessed on 1 October 2025).

[28]

World Aluminium.Alucycle in World Aluminium. 2020. Available online: accessed on 6 October 2025).

[29]

Schipper L, Meyers S. Energy Efficiency and Human Activity: Past Trends, Future Prospects; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1992.

[30]

Schipper L, Grubb M. On the rebound? Feedback between energy intensities and energy uses in IEA countries. Energy Policy 2000, 28, 367-388. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00018-5.

[31]

U.S. Geological Survey.Mineral Commodity Summaries 2025; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2025. doi:10.3133/mcs2025.

[32]

International Copper Study Group (ICSG). The World Copper Factbook 2020. 2020. Available online: https://internationalcopper.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/2020_10_13_ICSG_Factbook_2020.pdf (accessed on 5 October 2025).

[33]

International Aluminium Institute (IAI). Global Aluminium Recycling: A Cornerstone of a Sustainable Future. 2020. Available online: https://www.world-aluminium.org (accessed on 6 October 2025).

[34]

London Metal Exchange (LME). Copper.Historical Prices for Aluminium and 2023. Available online: https://www.lme.com (accessed on 6 October 2025).

[35]

OECD. Global Material Resources Outlook to 2060: Policy Scenarios; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2022.

[36]

Krautkraemer JA. Nonrenewable resource scarcity. J. Econ. Lit. 1998, 36, 2065-2107.

[37]

Dunning JH. Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 1980, 11, 9-31. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490593.

[38]

Dardor D, Flórez-Orrego D, Germanier R, Margni M, Maréchal F. Decarbonizing the aluminium industry: A comprehensive review of pathways and process integration perspectives. Energy Strategy Rev. 2025, 61, 101853. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2025.101853

[39]

Westmetall. Official LME Prices and Stocks: Copper-Daily Table. Westmetall GmbH. Available online: https://www.westmetall.com/en/markdaten.php (accessed on 5 October 2025).

[40]

Home A. Copper Stocks Surge Offers Little Relief for CME Shorts. Reuters, 2024. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/business/markets/copper-stocks-surge-offers-little-relief-cme-shorts-2024-06-25/ (accessed on 5 October 2025).

[41]

Home A. Copper Squeezed in the United States But China Has Plenty. Reuters, 2024. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/business/markets/copper-squeezed-united-states-china-has-plenty-2024-05-22/ (accessed on 5 October 2025).

[42]

Reuters. China Slashes Mortgage Reference Rates to Revive Property Market. Reuters, 2024. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/markets/asia/china-lowers-mortgage-reference-rate-by-25-basis-points-2024-02-20/ (accessed on 5 October 2025).

[43]

Reuters. China’s State Grid Outlays Record USD 88.7 Billion Investment for 2025. Reuters, 2025. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/chinas-state-grid-outlays-record-887-bln-investment-2025-2025-01-15/ (accessed on 5 October 2025).

[44]

Devitt P. Grasberg Mine Accident Tightens Global Copper Supply Estimates. Reuters, 2025. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/grasberg-mine-accident-tightens-global-copper-supply-estimates-2025-09-30/ (accessed on 5 October 2025).

[45]

International Copper Study Group (ICSG). Copper Market Forecast 2025- 2026. Press Release, April 2025. Available online: https://icsg.org/download/2025-04-28-icsg-forecast-press-release-pdf (accessed on 4 October 2025)

[46]

Nieves V, Becedas M. La caída en picado del cobre destapa lo que está ocurriendo en China con la economía. elEconomista, May 2023. Available online: https://www.eleconomista.es/mercados-cotizaciones/noticias/12293523/05/23/la-caida-en-picado-del-cobre-destapa-lo-que-esta-ocurriendo-en-china-con-la-economia.html (accessed on 3 October 2025)

[47]

Peterson RD, Tabereaux AT.Aluminum Production. In Treatise on Process Metallurgy: Industrial Processes; Seetharaman S, Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 839-917.

PDF (1060KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/