Parameter identification of an open-frame underwater vehicle based on numerical simulation and quantum particle swarm optimization

Mingzhi Chen , Yuan Liu , Daqi Zhu , Anfeng Shen , Chao Wang , Kaimin Ji

Intelligence & Robotics ›› 2024, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) : 216 -29.

PDF
Intelligence & Robotics ›› 2024, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) :216 -29. DOI: 10.20517/ir.2024.14
Research Article

Parameter identification of an open-frame underwater vehicle based on numerical simulation and quantum particle swarm optimization

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Accurate parameter identification of underwater vehicles is of great significance for their controller design and fault diagnosis. Some studies adopt numerical simulation methods to obtain the model parameters of underwater vehicles, but usually only conduct decoupled single-degree-of-freedom steady-state numerical simulations to identify resistance parameters. In this paper, the velocity response is solved by applying a force (or torque) to the underwater vehicle based on the overset grid and Dynamic Fluid-Body Interaction model of STAR-CCM+, solving for the velocity response of an underwater vehicle in all directions in response to propulsive force (or moment) inputs. Based on the data from numerical simulations, a parameter identification method using quantum particle swarm optimization is proposed to simultaneously identify inertia and resistance parameters. By comparing the forward velocity response curves obtained from pool experiments, the identified vehicle model’s mean square error of forward velocity is less than 0.20%, which is superior to the steady-state simulation method and particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm approaches.

Keywords

Underwater vehicle / parameter identification / numerical simulation / quantum particle swarm optimization / dynamic fluid-body interaction

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Mingzhi Chen, Yuan Liu, Daqi Zhu, Anfeng Shen, Chao Wang, Kaimin Ji. Parameter identification of an open-frame underwater vehicle based on numerical simulation and quantum particle swarm optimization. Intelligence & Robotics, 2024, 4(2): 216-29 DOI:10.20517/ir.2024.14

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Banerjee I,Kane RS.Antifouling coatings: recent developments in the design of surfaces that prevent fouling by proteins, bacteria, and marine organisms.Adv Mater2011;23:690-718

[2]

Chen M,Pang W.An effective strategy for distributed unmanned underwater vehicles to encircle and capture intelligent targets.IEEE T Ind Electron2024;71:12570-80

[3]

Xu F,Yin JC.Identification modeling of underwater vehicles’ nonlinear dynamics based on support vector machines.Ocean Eng2013;67:68-76

[4]

Luque JCC,de Barros EA.AUV parameter identification.IFAC Proc Vol2009;42:72-7

[5]

Huajun Z,Hang G.The parameter identification of the autonomous underwater vehicle based on multi-innovation least squares identification algorithm.Int J Adv Robot Syst2020;17:1729881420921016

[6]

Ahmed F,Jiang C,Yang S.Survey on traditional and AI based estimation techniques for hydrodynamic coefficients of autonomous underwater vehicle.Ocean Eng2023;268:113300

[7]

Wang D,Shen Y,He B.Hyperparameter optimization for the LSTM method of AUV model identification based on Q-learning.J Mar Sci Eng2022;10:1002

[8]

van de Ven PWJ, Johansen TA, Sørensen AJ, Flanagan C, Toal D. Neural network augmented identification of underwater vehicle models.IFAC Proc Vol2004;37:263-8

[9]

Chocron O,Benbouzid M.Dynamic reconfiguration of autonomous underwater vehicles propulsion system using genetic optimization.Ocean Eng2018;156:564-79

[10]

Cardenas P.Estimation of AUV hydrodynamic coefficients using analytical and system identification approaches.IEEE J Oceanic Eng2020;45:1157-76

[11]

Lin M,Li D.Hybrid strategy based model parameter estimation of irregular-shaped underwater vehicles for predicting velocity.Robot Auton Syst2020;127:103480

[12]

Prawin J,Lakshmi K.Nonlinear parametric identification strategy combining reverse path and hybrid dynamic quantum particle swarm optimization.Nonlinear Dynam2016;84:797-815

[13]

Sun B,Chen M.Development and experimental verification of search and rescue ROV.Intell Robot2022;2:355-70

[14]

Zhou G,Liu C.Parameter identification and model prediction path following control of underactuated AUV: methodology and experimental verification.Control Eng Pract2023;141:105729

[15]

Hong L,Cai X.Numerical investigation on hydrodynamic performance of a portable AUV.J Mar Sci Eng2021;9:812

[16]

Bentes C. Modeling of an autonomous underwater vehicle. 2016. Available from: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:198363077. [Last accessed on 25 Jun 2024]

[17]

Wang C,Schaefer D.Dynamic modeling of an autonomous underwater vehicle.J Mar Sci Technol2015;20:199-212

[18]

Bao H.Modeling and trajectory tracking model predictive control novel method of AUV based on CFD data.Sensors2022;22:4234

[19]

Li J, Wang Y, IV T, Di F. Model identification method of intervention AUV system based on numerical simulation. In: Second International Conference on Mechanical Design and Simulation (MDS 2022); Wuhan, China. pp. 953-69.

[20]

Fossen TI.Handbook of marine craft hydrodynamics and motion control. 2011.

[21]

Luo YH,Zhou HF.Trajectory tracking control of underwater vehicle based on hydrodynamic parameters calculated by CFD.Chin J Ship Res2022;17:237-45,272

[22]

Shi W,Wu C.Multi pseudo Q-learning-based deterministic policy gradient for tracking control of autonomous underwater vehicles.IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst2019;30:3534-46

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

219

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/