Evolution of pharmaceuticals using 3D and 4D printing
Afiya Baig, Rohan Barse, Asawari Paryekar, Vijay Jagtap
Evolution of pharmaceuticals using 3D and 4D printing
This overview examines the latest developments and applications of 3D and 4D printing in the health care and pharmaceutical field. The technique of creating a 3D object from a 3D model in the required size and shape is known as 3D printing. Whereas, 4D printing is the establishment of intricate three-dimensional formations that can change form in response to various external inputs. Applying 3D printing technology 3D printing, the healthcare industry has produced significant strides toward a patient-centred approach. The future of biomedical science and patient-centered care could be completely transformed by 3D printing with further advancements in research and development. 3D, 4D Technology used in printing is one of the most advanced industrial technologies available worldwide. The 3D and 4D printing pharmaceutical enterprises have completed the shift from centralised to distributed systems for the purpose of creating dosage forms. The goal of the study is to support the research goal of determining the degree to which patient-specific treatment is enhanced and healthcare outcomes are improved through the use of printing technologies in pharmaceuticals. Beyond this thorough analysis, the study highlights potential and problems from several angles and comparative aspects between 3D and 4D printing.
3D printing / 4D printing / Personalised medicine / Medication administration / Pharmaceutical applications
[1] |
Tracy Timothy
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Islam Rofiqul
|
[3] |
Haleem Abid
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Shanthi Chede LR. Jaidev Chakka1. 3D printing of pharmaceuticals for disease treatment. Frontiers in Medical Technology. 2022;4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2022.1040052.
|
[5] |
Wadher K, Trivedi R, et al. 3D printing in pharmaceuticals: an emerging technology full of challenges. Ann Pharm Fr. 2021;79:107–118.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Ani Jose Preethy
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Carmen Alvarez-Lorenzo
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Goole J, Amighi K. 3D printing in pharmaceutics: a new tool for designing customized drug delivery systems. Internaltional Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2016;29(1–2):376–394.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Zheng D, Tang M, et al. 3D-printed ketoenamine crosslinked polyrotaxane hydrogels and their mechanochromic responsiveness. Polym Chem. 2023;14:2159–2163.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Pita-Vilar M, Concheiro A, et al. Recent advances in 3D printed cellulose-based wound dressings: a review on in vitro and in vivo achievements. Carbohydr Polym. 2023;321:121298.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
pund Atul
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Mahmoud DB, Schulz-Siegmund M. Utilizing 4D printing to design smart gastroretentive, esophageal, and intravesical drug delivery systems. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2023:2202631.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Bodani Urval Panchal
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Lee BK, Yun YH, et al. Fabrication of drug-loaded polymer microparticles with arbitrary geometries using a piezoelectric inkjet printing system. Int J Pharm. 2012;427(2):305–310.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Vaz VM, Kumar L. 3D printing as a promising tool in personalized medicine. The American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists pharmscitech. 2021;22:49.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Meléndez PA, Kane KM, Matteo Cerea
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Triadji Nugroho Wendy
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Craniofac J, Ricci JL, et al. Three-dimensional printing of bone repair and replacement materials: impact on craniofacial surgery. Surg. 2012;23(1):304–308.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Prasad LK, Smyth H. 3D Printing technologies for drug delivery: a review. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2016;42:1019–1031.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Gazzaniga Andrea
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
van der Klift Frank
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Economidou SN, Lamprou DA, et al. 3D printing applications for transdermal drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2018;544:415–424.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Melocchi Alice
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Wang J, Goyanes A, et al. 3D printing of oral modified-release dosage forms. Int J Pharm. 2016;503:207–212.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Martinez PR, Goyanes A, et al. Fabrication of drug-loaded hydrogels with stereolithographic 3D printing. Int J Pharm. 2017;532:313–317.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Mojtaba Falahati
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Shinde Snehal
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Enke Marcel
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Zhou Xueli
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Li Yangyang
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Shakor Pshtiwan
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Fouzan Iftekar Syed
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Mostafaei Amir
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Kumari Gourvi
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Hassan A. Alshahrani. Review of 4D printing materials and reinforced composites: behaviors, applications and challenges. J Sci: Advanced Materials and Devices. 2021;6:167–185.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[36] |
Sajjad Ramisha
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[37] |
Atta Islam
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[38] |
Leng J, Sha W, et al. Industry 5.0: prospect and retrospect. J Manuf Syst. 2022;65:279–295.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[39] |
Shinde Snehal
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[40] |
Mehta Parth
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[41] |
Peng Fua
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[42] |
Demoly Frédéric
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[43] |
Morley CD, Ding EA, et al. A balance between inter-and intra-microgel mechanics governs stem cell viability in injectable dynamic granular hydrogels. Adv. Materials. 2023;35:2304212.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[44] |
Iyengar KP, Zaw Pe E, et al. Industry 5.0 technology capabilities in trauma and orthopaedics. J Orthop. 2022;32:125–132.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[45] |
Pavan Kalyan BG, Mehrotra Sonal
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[46] |
Song Wenliang
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[47] |
Zhou JK, Feng HF, et al. Resistance-switchable conjugated polyrotaxane for flexible high-performance RRAMs. Materials horizon. 2022;9:1526–1535.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[48] |
Shen Lau Hui
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[49] |
Kumar Raman
|
[50] |
Ji S, Guvendiren M. Recent advances in bioink design for 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2017;5:23.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[51] |
Gaurav Nazeer hasan
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[52] |
Mohamadhoseini M, Mohamadnia Z. Supramolecular self-healing materials via host-guest strategy between cyclodextrin and specific types of guest molecules. Coord Chem Rev. 2021;432:213711.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[53] |
Hatami Hooman
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[54] |
Alomari M, Vuddanda PR, et al. Printing T3 and T4 oral drug combinations as a novel strategy for hypothyroidism. Int J Pharm. 2018;549(1–2):363–369.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[55] |
Mallakpour Shadpour
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[56] |
kumar Santosh
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[57] |
Nakamura M, Iwanaga S, et al. Biomatrices and biomaterials for future developments of bioprinting and biofabrication. Biofabrication. 2010;2(1):014110.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[58] |
Jiménez M, Romero L, et al. An overview about 3D printing methods and future prospects. Additive manufacturing technologies: Complexity. 2019.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[59] |
Minhaz Ahmad
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |