A study on fused deposition modeling (FDM) and laser-based additive manufacturing (LBAM) in the medical field

Minhaz Ahmad, Mohd Javaid, Abid Haleem

PDF(883 KB)
PDF(883 KB)
Intelligent Pharmacy ›› 2024, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (3) : 381-391. DOI: 10.1016/j.ipha.2024.02.010
Review article

A study on fused deposition modeling (FDM) and laser-based additive manufacturing (LBAM) in the medical field

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Fused deposition modelling (FDM) and laser-based additive manufacturing (LBAM) are the essential technologies of 3D Printing under the technological platform of additive manufacturing (AM). This process involves layering tiny layers of a chosen material until the desired three-dimensional shape is achieved. FDM and LBAM have been commercialised and are also being deployed in a variety of medical fields. These technologies are worthwhile in reducing expenditures, increasing precision, and lowering operating and post-operative hazards, and the most crucial part is customisation. FDM is witnessing significant growth as an AM technology primarily because of its exceptional ability to construct functional parts with complex geometries. This study aims to investigate the effect of different process parameters such as build orientation, layer thickness, raster angle, air gap, printing speed, infill density, and extrusion temperature on the mechanical properties of FDM printed parts. This paper explores FDM and LBAM, the technological developments that have various applications in the medical field. Using a laser beam to fuse or melt successive layers of wire or powder material together to form three-dimensional objects is known as LBAM. It is one adaptable manufacturing process that is widely used to create metallic components with improved characteristics. By implementing FDM or LBAM technologies, surgeons can provide patients with precise and better information. The patient’s adaption period for customised prostheses/implants is shorter, less painful, and less stressful. Where regular implants are often insufficient for some patients with complex circumstances, the ability to quickly manufacture personalised implants by using these technologies is quite helpful. This paper provides readers with an insight into the capabilities of FDM and LBAM in the medical field.

Keywords

Additive manufacturing / Fused deposition modeling (FDM) / Laser Based additive manufacturing (LBAM) / Medical field

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Minhaz Ahmad, Mohd Javaid, Abid Haleem. A study on fused deposition modeling (FDM) and laser-based additive manufacturing (LBAM) in the medical field. Intelligent Pharmacy, 2024, 2(3): 381‒391 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipha.2024.02.010

References

[1]
Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL. Optimisation of fused deposition modelling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects. Adv Manuf. 2015;3(1):42–53.
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Cookson MD, Stirk PMR. “A Review Study On The Effect Of Printing Parameters Of Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) Metal Polymer Composite Parts On Mechanical Properties And Surface Roughness Nor,”. 2019;18(1):281–297.
[3]
Dey A, Yodo N. A systematic survey of FDM process parameter optimisation and their influence on part characteristics. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing. 2019;3(3).
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Shahrubudin N, Lee TC, Ramlan R. An overview on 3D printing technology: technological, materials, and applications. In: Procedia Manufacturing. Elsevier B.V.;2019:1286–1296.
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Hitzler L, Merkel M, Hall W, Öchsner A. A review of metal fabricated with laser-and powder-bed based additive manufacturing techniques: process, nomenclature, materials, achievable properties, and its utilisation in the medical sector. Adv Eng Mater. 2018;20(5):1700658.
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Schmidt M, Merklein M, Bourell D, et al. Laser-based additive manufacturing in industry and academia. Cirp Annals. 2017;66(2):561–583.
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Salmi M. Additive manufacturing processes in medical applications. Materials. 2021;14(1):191.
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Kaligar AB, Kumar HA, Ali A, et al. Femtosecond laser-based additive manufacturing: current status and perspectives. Quantum Beam Science. 2022;6(1):5.
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Aliyu AAA, Panwisawas C, Shinjo J, et al. Laser-based additive manufacturing of bulk metallic glasses: recent advances and future perspectives for biomedical applications. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2023.
[10]
Afrose MF, Masood SH, Iovenitti P, Nikzad M, Sbarski I. Effects of part build orientations on fatigue behaviour of FDM-processed PLA material. Progress in Additive Manufacturing. Jun. 2016;1(1–2):21–28.
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Eryildiz M. Effect of build orientation on mechanical behaviour and build time of FDM 3D-printed PLA parts: an experimental investigation. European Mechanical Science. 2021;5(3):116–120.
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Wang YT, Yeh YT. Effect of print angle on mechanical properties of FDM 3D structures printed with POM material. In: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. PartF9;2017:157–167.
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Petruse RE, Puşcaşu S, Pascu A, Bondrea I. NC-ND License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Selection and Peer-Review under Responsibility of 35th Danubia Key Factors towards a High-Quality Additive Manufacturing Process with ABS material-NC-ND License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Selection and Peer-Review under Responsibility of 35th Danubia Adria Symposium on Advances in Experimental Mechanics;2019 [Online]. Available: www.sciencedirect.comwww.materialstoday.com/proceedingS2214-7853.
[14]
Syrlybayev D, Zharylkassyn B, Seisekulova A, Akhmetov M, Perveen A, Talamona D. Optimisation of strength properties of FDM printed parts—a critical review. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(10).
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Wu W, Geng P, Li G, Zhao D, Zhang H, Zhao J. Influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed PEEK and a comparative mechanical study between PEEK and ABS. Materials. 2015;8(9).
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Frunzaverde D, et al. The influence of the layer height and the filament color on the dimensional accuracy and the tensile strength of FDM-printed PLA specimens. Polymers (Basel). May 2023;15(10).
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Moradi M, Aminzadeh A, Rahmatabadi D, Rasouli SA. Statistical and experimental analysis of process parameters of 3D Nylon printed parts by fused deposition modeling: response surface modeling and optimisation. J Mater Eng Perform. Jul. 2021;30(7):5441–5454.
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Ziemian C, Sharma M, Ziemi S. Anisotropic mechanical properties of ABS parts fabricated by fused deposition modelling. In: Mechanical Engineering. InTech;2012.
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Huang B, Singamneni S. Raster angle mechanics in fused deposition modelling. J Compos Mater. Feb. 2015;49(3):363–383.
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Ramiah K, Pandian P. Effect of process parameters on the strength of ABS based FDM prototypes: novel machine learning based hybrid optimisation technique. Mater Res Express. Feb. 2023;10(2).
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Muhamedagic K, et al. Effect of process parameters on tensile strength of FDM printed carbon fiber reinforced polyamide parts. Applied Sciences (Switzerland). Jun. 2022;12(12).
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS. Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts. Mater Des. Jan. 2010;31(1):287–295.
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Mishra SB, Abhishek K, Satapathy MP, Mahapatra SS. Parametric appraisal of compressive strength of FDM build parts. In: Materials Today: Proceedings. Elsevier Ltd;2017:9456–9460.
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Gebisa AW, Lemu HG. Influence of 3D printing FDM process parameters on tensile property of ultem 9085. In: Procedia Manufacturing. Elsevier B.V.;2019:331–338.
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Algarni M, Ghazali S. Comparative study of the sensitivity of pla, abs, peek, and petg’s mechanical properties to fdm printing process parameters. Crystals (Basel). Aug. 2021;11(8).
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Miazio Ł. Impact of print speed on strength of samples printed in FDM technology. Agricultural Engineering. Jun. 2019;23(2):33–38.
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Yang TC, Yeh CH. Morphology and mechanical properties of 3D printed wood fiber/polylactic acid composite parts using Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM): the effects of printing speed. Polymers (Basel). Jun. 2020;12(6):1334.
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Rodríguez-Panes A, Claver J, Camacho AM. The influence of manufacturing parameters on the mechanical behaviour of PLA and ABS pieces manufactured by FDM: a comparative analysis. Materials. Aug. 2018;11(8).
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Jatti VS, Sapre MS, Jatti AV, Khedkar NK, Jatti VS. Mechanical properties of 3D-printed components using fused deposition modeling: optimisation using the Desirability approach and machine learning Regressor. Applied System Innovation. Dec. 2022;5(6).
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Hameed AZ, Aravind Raj S, Kandasamy J, Shahzad MA, Baghdadi MA. 3D printing parameter optimisation using taguchi approach to examine acrylonitrile styrene acrylate (ASA) mechanical properties. Polymers (Basel). Aug. 2022;14(16).
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Tanveer MQ, Haleem A, Suhaib M. Effect of variable infill density on mechanical behaviour of 3-D printed PLA specimen: an experimental investigation. SN Appl Sci. Dec. 2019;1(12).
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Durga Prasada Rao V, Rajiv P, Navya Geethika V. Effect of fused deposition modelling (FDM) process parameters on tensile strength of carbon fibre PLA. In: Materials Today: Proceedings. Elsevier Ltd;2019:2012–2018.
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Alam N, Alam M, Ahmad S. Optimisation of fused deposition modelling process parameters using teaching learning based optimization (TLBO) algorithm. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. May 2021;1149(1):012014.
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Khan S, Joshi K, Deshmukh S. A comprehensive review on effect of printing parameters on mechanical properties of FDM printed parts. Mater Today Proc. 2021;50(xxxx):2119–2127.
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Di Angelo L, Di Stefano P, Dolatnezhadsomarin A, Guardiani E, Khorram E, Di Stefano P. A Reliable Build Orientation Optimisation Method in Additive Manufacturing: The Application to FDM Technology. 2020.
[36]
Wu W, Geng P, Li G, Zhao D, Zhang H, Zhao J. Influence of Layer Thickness and Raster Angle on the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed PEEK and a Comparative Mechanical Study between PEEK and ABS. 2015:5834–5846.
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Popescu D, Zapciu A, Amza C, Baciu F, Marinescu R. FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: a review. Polym Test. 2018;69:157–166.
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Solomon IJ, Sevvel P, Gunasekaran J. A review on the various processing parameters in FDM. Mater Today Proc. 2020;37(2):509–514.
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Kuclourya T, Monroy R, Ahmad R. Design of experiments to compare the reprocessing effect with Fused Deposition Modeling printing parameters on mechanical properties of Polylactic Acid specimens towards circular economy. Prog Rubber Plast Recycl Technol.2022.
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Team Xometry;Laser Power: Definition, How It Works, Importance, and How to Determine;https://www.xometry.com/resources/sheet/laser-power/#:∼text=Laser%20power%20is%20the%20energy, %2C%20beam%20power%2C%20and%20irra diance.
[41]
Scantech;Laser thickness measurement;https://scantech.com/information/mea surement/laser-thickness-measurement/.
[42]
Kempen K, Yasa E, Thijis L, Kruth JP, Humbeeck JV. Microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melted 18Ni-300 steel. Phys Procedia. 2011;12:255–263.
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Zhang B, Lee X, Bai J, et al. Study of selective laser melting (SLM) Inconel 718 parts surface improvement by electrochemical polishing. Mater Des. 2017;116:531–537.
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Rashid R, Masood SH, Ruan D, Palanisamy S, Rashid RAR, Brandt M. Effect of scan strategy on density and metallurgical properties of 17-4PH parts printed by selective laser melting (SLM). J Mater Process Technol. 2017;249:502–511.
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Geiger F, Kunze K, Etter T. Tailoring the texture of IN738LC processed by selective laser melting (SLM) by specific scanning strategies. Mater Sci Eng. 2016;661:240–246.
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Kudzal A, McWilliams B, Hofmeister C, et al. Effect of scan pattern on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Powder bed Fusion additive manufactured 17-4 stainless steel. Mater Des. 2017;133:205–215.
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Ahmadi A, Mirzaeifar R, Moghaddam NS, Turabi AS, Karaca HE, Elahinia M. Effect of manufacturing parameters on mechanical properties of 316L stainless steel parts fabricated by selective laser melting: a computational framework. Mater Des. 2016;112:328–338.
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Gu D, Chen H. Selective laser melting of high strength and toughness stainless steel parts: the roles of laser hatch style and part placement strategy. Mater Sci Eng. 2018;725:419–427.
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Sun SH, Hagihara K, Nakano T. Effect of scanning strategy on texture formation in Ni-25 at.% Mo alloys fabricated by selective laser melting. Mater Des. 2018;140:307–316.
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Buj-Corral I, Tejo-Otero A, Fenollosa-Artés F. Use of FDM technology in healthcare applications: recent advances. In: Fused Deposition Modeling Based 3D Printing. 2021:277–297.
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Tepylo N, Huang X, Patnaik PC. Laser-based additive manufacturing technologies for aerospace applications. Adv Eng Mater. 2019;21(11):1900617.
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Paul CP, Jinoop AN, Kumar A, Bindra KS. Laser-based metal additive manufacturing: technology, global scenario and our experiences. Transactions of the Indian National Academy of Engineering. 2021:1–14.
[53]
Quodbach J, Bogdahn M, Breitkreutz J, et al. Quality of FDM 3D Printed Medicines for Paediatrics: Considerations for Formulation Development, Filament Extrusion, Printing Process and Printer Design. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science;2021:1–19.
[54]
Cooper KP. Laser-based additive manufacturing: where it has been, where it needs to go. Laser 3D Manufacturing. 2014, March;8970:10–15. SPIE.
[55]
Haryńska A, Carayon I, Kosmela P, et al. A comprehensive evaluation of flexible FDM/FFF 3D printing filament as a potential material in medical application. Eur Polym J. 2020;138:109958.
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Ferretti P, Leon-Cardenas C, Sali M, et al. Application of TPU—sourced 3D printed FDM organs for improving the realism in surgical planning and training. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Singapore. 2021, March:7–11.
[57]
Zaharin HA, Abdul Rani AM, Ginta TL, Azam FI. Additive manufacturing technology for biomedical components: a review. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineeringvol. 328.
[58]
Buj-Corral I, Tejo-Otero A, Fenollosa-Artés F. Use of FDM technology in healthcare applications: recent advances. In: Fused Deposition Modeling Based 3D Printing. 2021:277–297.
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Ghomi ER, Khosravi F, Neisiany RE, Singh S, Ramakrishna S. Future of additive manufacturing in healthcare. Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering. 2021;17:100255.
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Cailleaux S, Sanchez-Ballester NM, Gueche YA, Bataille B, Soulairol I. Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), the new asset for the production of tailored medicines. J Contr Release. 2021;330:821–841.
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Calì M, Pascoletti G, Gaeta M, Milazzo G, Ambu R. New filaments with natural fillers for FDM 3D printing and their applications in biomedical field. Procedia Manuf. 2020;51:698–703.
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Trevisan F, Calignano F, Aversa A, et al. Additive manufacturing of titanium alloys in the biomedical field: processes, properties and applications. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2018;16(2):57–67.
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Otero JJ, Vijverman A, Mommaerts MY. Use of fused deposit modeling for additive manufacturing in hospital facilities: European certification directives. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2017;45(9):1542–1546.
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Jang IS, Nam SW, Kim JS. Realistic previsualization based on color characteristics of the 3Dprinter. In: IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), IEEE. 2017.
[65]
Ali MH, Mir-Nasiri N, Ko WL. Multi-nozzle extrusion system for 3D printer and its control mechanism. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2016;86(1/4):999–1010.
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Abilgaziyev A, Kulzhan T, Raissov N, Ali MH, Match WK, Mir-Nasiri N. Design and development of multi-nozzle extrusion system for 3D printer. In: International Conference on Informatics, Electronics & Vision (ICIEV). IEEE;2015.
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 2024 The Authors. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd.
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(883 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/