Unravelling the influenza virus inhibitory potential: Ligand-based docking, pharmacophore, MM-GBSA, and molecular dynamic simulation of phytochemicals and cyanobacteria metabolites
John Maria Jancy Rani, Karunanithi Kalaimathi, Srinivasan Prabhu, Muniappan Ayyanar, Shine Kadaikunnan, Subramaniyan Vijayakumar, Sathammai Priya, Jayasree Sheshadri, Singamoorthy Amalraj, Muthu Thiruvengadam, Stanislaus Antony Ceasar
Unravelling the influenza virus inhibitory potential: Ligand-based docking, pharmacophore, MM-GBSA, and molecular dynamic simulation of phytochemicals and cyanobacteria metabolites
Viral outbreaks facilitated by global travel and modernity pose significant threats to global health. Influenza viruses, particularly α-influenza and β-influenza strains, have been plaguing human populations since time immemorial. Despite their long-standing impact, effective drugs are yet to be developed, and co-infection with these viruses can lead to severe health complications. In light of these challenges, this study aimed to investigate the potential antiviral molecules sourced from cyanobacteria and herbs. We conducted virtual screening using ligand-based docking to identify potential phytochemicals and cyanobacterial metabolites as candidates for further evaluation. Subsequently, pharmacophore modeling was employed to validate the binding modes of the selected compounds, followed by MM-GBSA calculations to assess their binding affinities and stabilities within the viral target. Among the molecules investigated, the cyanobacterial compound Symplocamide A (-8.042) demonstrated notable outcomes in docking than the herb molecules in the docked ligand. This finding suggests its potential as a therapeutic agent against influenza A virus proteins. Additionally, cyanobacterial molecules such as Lyngbyastatins 3 (-8.001), Lyngbyastatin G1 (-7.501), and Kempenopeptide (-6.128) exhibit stronger binding affinities and more potent docking scores, making them promising candidates for targeting viral proteins in potential therapeutic applications. The present study reveals the possibility of harnessing cyanobacterial molecules as novel antiviral agents against influenza viruses. Ultimately, we believe that this research will serve as a stepping stone in the quest for innovative drugs to combat respiratory diseases caused by viral infections.
Influenza A virus / Phytochemicals / Cyanobacteria metabolites / Molecular docking / Pharmacophore / MM-GBSA / MD simulations
[1] |
Liu L, Zeng F, Rao J, et al. Comparison of clinical features and outcomes of medically attended COVID-19 and influenza patients in a defined population in the 2020 respiratory virus season. Front Public Health. 2021;9:587425.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Bonilla-Aldana DK, Aguirre-Florez M, Villamizar-Peña R, et al. After SARS-CoV-2, will H5N6 and other influenza viruses follow the pandemic path? Inf Med. 2020;28(4):475–485.
|
[3] |
Philippon DAM, Wu P, Cowling BJ, et al. Avian influenza human infections at the human-animal interface. J Infect Dis. 2020;222(4):528–537.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Kessler S, Harder TC, Schwemmle M, et al. Influenza A viruses and zoonotic events—are we creating our own reservoirs? Viruses. 2021;13(11):2250.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Kalil AC, Thomas P. Influenza virus-related critical illness: pathophysiology and epidemiology. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):258.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Joseph U, Su YCF, Vijaykrishna,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Franco-Paredes C, Hernandez-Ramos I, Del Rio C, et al. H1N1 influenza pandemics: comparing the events of 2009 in Mexico with those of 1976 and 1918-1919. Arch Med Res. 2009;40:669–672.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Chuah CXP, Lim RL, Chen MIC. Investigating the Legacy of the 1918 influenza pandemic in age-related seroepidemiology and immune responses to subsequent influenza A(H1N1) viruses through a structural equation model. Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187:2530–2540.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Krammer F, García-Sastre A, Palese P. Is it possible to develop a “universal” influenza virus vaccine? potential target antigens and critical aspects for a universal influenza vaccin. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol. 2018;10(7):a028845.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Xu Z, Shi L, Wang Y, et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;(4):420–422.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Zu M, Li C, Fang JS, et al. Drug discovery of host CLK1 inhibitors for influenza treatment. Molecules. 2015;20.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Cai C, Xu L, Fang J, et al. In-silico prediction and bioactivity evaluation of chemical ingredients against Influenza A virus from Isatis tinctoria L. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:755396.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
www.rcsb.com.
|
[14] |
Kalaimathi K, Thiyagarajan G, Vijayakumar S, et al. Molecular docking and network pharmacology-based approaches to explore the potential of terpenoids for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Pharmaco Res-Mode Chin Med. 2021;1:100002.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Kalaimathi K, Maria Jancy Rani J, Manogar P, et al. In vitro and in silico strategies for the assessment of fungicidal compounds from the bark of Bauhinia racemosa against dermatitis: clinical isolates. Integrative Medicine Reports. 2022:76–85.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Christy Rani A, Sujitha S, Kalaimathi K, et al. Uncovering of anti dengue molecules from plants prescribed for dengue: a computational investigation. Chem Afri. 2022.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Sangeetha M, Vijayakumar S, Prabhu S, et al. In-silico and in-vitro studies on Lyngbya majuscula using against lung cancer cell line (A549). Pharmacogn J. 2018;10(3):421–428.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Maria Jancy Rani J, Kalaimathi K, Vijayakumar S, et al. Anti-viral efectuality of plant polyphenols against mutated dengue protein NS2B47-NS3: a computational exploration. Gene Rep. 2022;27:101546.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Oliveira AF, Teixeira RR, Oliveira AS, et al. Potential antivirals: natural products targeting replication enzymes of dengue and chikungunya viruses. Molecules. 2017;22(3):505.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Kapoor R, Sharma B, Kanwar SS. Antiviral phytochemicals: an overview. Biochem Physiol. 2017;6(2):7.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Akram M, Tahir IM, Shah SM, et al. Antiviral potential of medicinal plants against HIV, HSV, influenza, hepatitis, and coxsackievirus: a systematic review. Phytother Res. 2018;32(5):811–822.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Ghildiyal R, Prakash V, Chaudhary VK, et al. In: Swamy MK, ed. Phytochemicals as Antiviral Agents: Recent Updates. Plant-derived Bioactives. 2018:279–295.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Perera C, Efferth T. Antiviral medicinal herbs and phytochemicals. J Pharmacogn. 2012;3(1):45–48.
|
[24] |
Subudhi B, Chattopadhyay S, Mishra P, et al. Current strategies for inhibition of chikungunya infection. Viruses. 2018;10(5):235.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Lipson SM, Karalis G, Karthikeyan L, et al. Mechanism of anti-rotavirus synergistic activity by epigallocatechin gallate and a proanthocyanidin-containing nutraceutical. Food Environ Virol. 2017;9(4):434–443.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Carpine R, Simon S. Antibacterial and antiviral metabolites from cyanobacteria: their application and their impact on human health. Current Res Biotech. 2021;3:65–81.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Prabhu S, Vijayakumar S, Praseetha PK. Cyanobacterial metabolites as novel drug candidates in corona viral therapies: a review. Chronic Dis Translational Medicine. 2022;8.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |