Detection of a temporal salient object benefits from visual stimulus-specific adaptation in avian midbrain inhibitory nucleus

Abstract

Food and predators are the most noteworthy objects for the basic survival of wild animals, and both are often deviant in both spatial and temporal domains and quickly attract an animal's attention. Although stimulus-specific adaptation (SSA) is considered a potential neural basis of salient sound detection in the temporal domain, related research on visual SSA is limited and its relationship with temporal saliency is uncertain. The avian nucleus isthmi pars magnocellularis (Imc), which is central to midbrain selective attention network, is an ideal site to investigate the neural correlate of visual SSA and detection of a salient object in the time domain. Here, the constant order paradigm was applied to explore the visual SSA in the Imc of pigeons. The results showed that the firing rates of Imc neurons gradually decrease with repetitions of motion in the same direction, but recover when a motion in a deviant direction is presented, implying visual SSA to the direction of a moving object. Furthermore, enhanced response for an object moving in other directions that were not presented ever in the paradigm is also observed. To verify the neural mechanism underlying these phenomena, we introduced a neural computation model involving a recoverable synaptic change with a “center-surround” pattern to reproduce the visual SSA and temporal saliency for the moving object. These results suggest that the Imc produces visual SSA to motion direction, allowing temporal salient object detection, which may facilitate the detection of the sudden appearance of a predator.

Keywords

adaptation / attention / model / pigeon / saliency

References

[1] Ahmadlou M, Zweifel LS, Heimel JA (2018). Functional modulation of primary visual cortex by the superior colliculus in the mouse. Nature Communications 9, 3895.

[2] Antunes F, Malmierca M (2011). Effect of auditory cortex deactivation on stimulus-specific adaptation in the medial geniculate body. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 31, 17306–16.

[3] Antunes F, Nelken I, Covey E, Malmierca M (2010). Stimulus-specific adaptation in the auditory thalamus of the anesthetized rat. PLoS ONE 5, e14071.

[4] Asadollahi A, Knudsen EI (2016). Spatially precise visual gain control mediated by a cholinergic circuit in the midbrain attention network. Nature Communication 7, 13472.

[5] Zhai, Y-Y, Auksztulewicz R, Song P-R et al. (2020). Synaptic adaptation contributes to stimulus-specific adaptation in the thalamic reticular nucleus. Neuroscience Bulletin 36, 1538–41.

[6] Boström JE, Dimitrova M, Canton C, Hastad O, Qvarnstrom A, Odeen A (2016). Ultra-rapid vision in birds. PLoS ONE 11, e0151099.

[7] Cleophas TJ, Zwinderman AH (2016). Trend test for continuous data (30 patients). In: Cleophas TJ, Zwinderman AH, eds. SPSS for Starters and 2nd Levelers. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 85–8.

[8] Deichler A, Carrasco D, Lopez-Jury L et al. (2020). A specialized reciprocal connectivity suggests a link between the mechanisms by which the superior colliculus and parabigeminal nucleus produce defensive behaviors in rodents. Scientific Reports 10, 16220.

[9] Duque D, Malmierca MS (2015). Stimulus-specific adaptation in the inferior colliculus of the mouse: Anesthesia and spontaneous activity effects. Brain Structure & Function 220, 3385–98.

[10] Duque D, Perez-Gonzalez D, Ayala YA, Palmer AR, Malmierca MS (2012). Topographic distribution, frequency, and intensity dependence of stimulus-specific adaptation in the inferior colliculus of the rat. Journal of Neuroscience 32, 17762–74.

[11] Dutta A, Gutfreund Y (2014). Saliency mapping in the optic tectum and its relationship to habituation. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 8, 1.

[12] Dutta A, Wagner H, Gutfreund Y (2016). Responses to pop-out stimuli in the barn owl's optic tectum can emerge through stimulus-specific adaptation. Journal of Neuroscience 36, 4876–87.

[13] Feng S, Cui Z, Han Z, Li H, Yu H (2022). V1-origin bidirectional plasticity in visual thalamo-ventral pathway and its contribution to saliency detection of dynamic visual inputs. Journal of Neuroscience 42, 6359–79.

[14] Ferger R, Pawlowsky K, Singheiser M, Wagner H (2018). Response adaptation in the barn owl's auditory space map. Journal of Neurophysiology 119, 1235–47.

[15] Garcia-Diaz A, Leboran V, Fdez-Vidal XR, Pardo XM (2012). On the relationship between optical variability, visual saliency, and eye fixations: A computational approach. Journal of Vision 12, 17.

[16] Garrido-Charad F, Vega-Zuniga T, Gutierrez-Ibanez C et al. (2018). “Shepherd's crook” neurons drive and synchronize the enhancing and suppressive mechanisms of the midbrain stimulus selection network. PNAS 115, 201804517.

[17] Goddard CA, Mysore SP, Bryant AS, Huguenard JR, Knudsen EI (2014). Spatially reciprocal inhibition of inhibition within a stimulus selection network in the avian midbrain. PLoS ONE 9, e85865.

[18] Gutfreund Y (2012). Stimulus-specific adaptation, habituation and change detection in the gaze control system. Biological Cybernetics 106, 657–68.

[19] Hershenhoren I, Taaseh N, Antunes FM, Nelken I (2014). Intracellular correlates of stimulus-specific adaptation. Journal of Neuroscience 34, 3303–19.

[20] Itti L, Koch C, Niebur E (1998). A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20, 1254–9.

[21] Dezfouli MP, Zarei M, Jahed M, Parto Dezfouli M (2019). Stimulus-specific adaptation decreases the coupling of spikes to LFP phase[J]. Frontiers in Neural Circuits 13, 44.

[22] Jia G, Li X, Liu C, He J, Gao L (2021). Stimulus-specific adaptation in auditory thalamus is modulated by the thalamic reticular nucleus. ACS Chemical Neuroscience 12, 1688–97.

[23] Kloos M, Weigel S, Luksch H (2019). Anatomy and physiology of neurons in layer 9 of the chicken optic tectum. Frontiers in Neural Circuits 13, 63.

[24] Knudsen EI (2011). Control from below: The role of a midbrain network in spatial attention. European Journal of Neuroscience 33, 1961–72.

[25] Knudsen El, Schwarz JS (2017). The optic tectum: A structure evolved for stimulus selection. In: Kaas JH, ed. Evolution of Nervous Systems, 2nd edn. Academic Press, pp. 387–408.

[26] Koch K, McLean J, Segev R et al. (2006). How much the eye tells the brain. Current Biology 16, 1428–34.

[27] Lee JH, Wang X, Bendor D (2020a). The role of adaptation in generating monotonic rate codes in auditory cortex. PLoS Computational Biology 16, e1007627.

[28] Lee KH, Tran A, Turan Z, Meister M (2020b). The sifting of visual information in the superior colliculus. eLife 9, e50678.

[29] Li DP, Xiao Q, Wang SR (2007). Feedforward construction of the receptive field and orientation selectivity of visual neurons in the pigeon. Cerebral Cortex 17, 885–93.

[30] Mahajan NR, Mysore SP (2018). Combinatorial neural inhibition for stimulus selection across space. Cell Reports 25, 1158–70e9.

[31] Mahajan NR, Mysore SP (2019). Neural circuit mechanism for generating categorical representations. bioRxiv,

[32] Mahajan NR, Mysore SP (2022). Donut-like organization of inhibition underlies categorical neural responses in the midbrain. Nature Communications 13, 1680.

[33] Malmierca MS, Cristaudo S, Perez-Gonzalez D, Covey E (2009). Stimulus-specific adaptation in the inferior colliculus of the anesthetized rat. Journal of Neuroscience 29, 5483–93.

[34] Mill R, Coath M, Wennekers T, Denham SL (2011). A neurocomputational model of stimulus-specific adaptation to oddball and Markov sequences. PLoS Computational Biology 7, e1002117.

[35] Mysore SP, Knudsen EI (2011). The role of a midbrain network in competitive stimulus selection. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 21, 653–60.

[36] Mysore SP, Knudsen EI (2013). A shared inhibitory circuit for both exogenous and endogenous control of stimulus selection. Nature Neuroscience 16, 473–8.

[37] Netser S, Zahar Y, Gutfreund Y (2011). Stimulus-specific adaptation: Can it be a neural correlate of behavioral habituation? Journal of Neuroscience 31, 17811–20.

[38] Nieto-Diego J, Malmierca MS (2016). Topographic distribution of stimulus-specific adaptation across auditory cortical fields in the anesthetized rat. PLoS Biology 14, e1002397.

[39] Ogawa H, Oka K (2015). Direction-specific adaptation in neuronal and behavioral responses of an insect mechanosensory system. Journal of Neuroscience 35, 11644–55.

[40] Parto Dezfouli M, Zarei M, Jahed M, Daliri MR (2019). Stimulus-specific adaptation decreases the coupling of spikes to LFP phase. Front Neural Circuits 13, 44.

[41] Potier S, Lieuvin M, Pfaff M, Kelber A (2020). How fast can raptors see? Journal of Experimental Biology 223, jeb209031.

[42] Quiroga RQ, Nadasdy Z, Ben-Shaul Y (2004). Unsupervised spike detection and sorting with wavelets and superparamagnetic clustering. Neural Computation 16, 1661–87.

[43] Reches A, Gutfreund Y (2008). Stimulus-specific adaptations in the gaze control system of the barn owl. Journal of Neuroscience 28, 1523–33.

[44] Schryver HM, Mysore SP (2019). Spatial dependence of stimulus competition in the avian nucleus isthmi pars magnocellularis. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 93, 137–51.

[45] Schryver HM, Straka M, Mysore SP (2020). Categorical signaling of the strongest stimulus by an inhibitory midbrain nucleus. Journal of Neuroscience 40, 4172–84.

[46] Shen L, Zhao L, Hong B (2015). Frequency-specific adaptation and its underlying circuit model in the auditory midbrain. Frontiers in Neural Circuits 9, 55.

[47] Taaseh N, Yaron A, Nelken I (2011). Stimulus-specific adaptation and deviance detection in the rat auditory cortex. PLoS ONE 6, e23369.

[48] Ugray Z, Lasdon L, Plummer J, Glover F, Kelly J, Martí R (2007). Scatter search and local NLP solvers: A multistart framework for global optimization. INFORMS Journal on Computing 19, 328–40.

[49] Ulanovsky N, Las L, Farkas D, Nelken I (2004). Multiple time scales of adaptation in auditory cortex neurons. Journal of Neuroscience 24, 10440–53.

[50] Ulanovsky N, Las L, Nelken I (2003). Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons. Nature Neuroscience 6, 391–8.

[51] Valdés-Baizabal C, Casado-Román L, Bartlett E, Malmierca M (2020). In vivo whole-cell recordings of stimulus-specific adaptation in the inferior colliculus. Hearing Research 399, 107978.

[52] Valdes-Baizabal C, Parras GG, Ayala YA, Malmierca MS (2017). Endocannabinoid modulation of stimulus-specific adaptation in inferior colliculus neurons of the rat. Scientific Reports 7, 6997.

[53] Vinken K, Vogels R, Op de Beeck H (2017). Recent visual experience shapes visual processing in rats through stimulus-specific adaptation and response enhancement. Current Biology 27, 914–9.

[54] Wang J, Niu X, Wang S, Wang Z, Shi L (2020). Entrainment within neuronal response in optic tectum of pigeon to video displays. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology Sensory Neural and Behavioral Physiology 206, 845–55.

[55] Wang YC, Frost BJ (1991). Visual response characteristics of neurons in the nucleus isthmi magnocellularis and nucleus isthmi parvocellularis of pigeons. Experimental Brain Research 87, 624–33.

[56] Wasmuht DF, Pena JL, Gutfreund Y (2017). Stimulus-specific adaptation to visual but not auditory motion direction in the barn owl's optic tectum. European Journal of Neuroscience 45, 610–21.

[57] Weber AI, Krishnamurthy K, Fairhall AL (2019). Coding principles in adaptation. Annual Review of Vision Science 5, 427–49.

[58] Weigel S, Kuenzel T, Lischka K, Huang G, Luksch H (2022). Morphology and dendrite-specific synaptic properties of midbrain neurons shape multimodal integration. Journal of Neuroscience 42, 2614–30.

[59] Wohlgemuth MJ, Kothari NB, Moss CF (2018). Functional organization and dynamic activity in the superior colliculus of the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus. Journal of Neuroscience 38, 245–56.

[60] Zhai Y-Y, Sun Z-H, Gong Y-M, Tang Y, Yu X (2019). Integrative stimulus-specific adaptation of the natural sounds in the auditory cortex of the awake rat. Brain Structure and Function 224, 1753–66.

[61] Zhao L, Liu Y, Shen L, Feng L, Hong B (2011). Stimulus-specific adaptation and its dynamics in the inferior colliculus of rat. Neuroscience 181, 163–74.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 2023 The Authors. Integrative Zoology published by International Society of Zoological Sciences, Institute of Zoology/Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.