Gaps in the protection of the amphibians of Myanmar–threat status, endemism, protected area coverage and One Plan Approach conservation
Marie Borgwerth , Carolin Scholten , Aung Lin , Myint Kyaw Thura , Larry Lee Grismer , Thomas Ziegler , Dennis Rödder
Integrative Conservation ›› 2024, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (4) : 353 -367.
Gaps in the protection of the amphibians of Myanmar–threat status, endemism, protected area coverage and One Plan Approach conservation
Currently, 41% of amphibian species are threatened with extinction, leading to the ongoing amphibian crisis. In Myanmar, the amphibian diversity is still poorly understood, and, as a result, many conservation gaps remain. To increase the knowledge about Myanmar’s amphibians and thus provide an opportunity to fill the gaps in conservation in the country, we assess the species in greater detail. To do so, we compile a species list of the amphibians of Myanmar through various sources and evaluate their threat status using the IUCN Red list. We perform richness analyses to compare the distribution areas of the amphibian species of Myanmar to the distribution of the protected areas (PAs) in the country. We evaluate the representation of Myanmar’s amphibians in zoos worldwide through the Zoological Information Management System (ZIMS) to check the implementation of the One Plan Approach to Conservation. Our results suggest that there are 152 amphibian species extant in Myanmar, of which 25 are endemic to the country. 4.6% (n = 7) of all species are classified as threatened, but counting those with insufficient available data as possibly threatened increases the number to 44.1% (n = 67). Of them, 40 species are not covered by any of Myanmar’s PAs. That includes 28.6% of the threatened, 35.7% of the potentially threatened, and 48% of the endemic species. According to the ZIMS database, none of Myanmar’s threatened, potentially threatened, or endemic amphibian species are kept in any zoo or aquarium worldwide, suggesting that the One Plan Approach is not sufficiently implemented as a conservation measure for Myanmar’s amphibians. With this study, we show conspicuous gaps in the protection of Myanmar’s amphibians and provide a list of the 36 most threatened species, recommending a possible prioritization for upcoming conservation actions.
amphibians / captive breeding / ex situ / gap analysis / in situ / Myanmar / protected area coverage
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
Amphibia Web. (2023) An Online Reference. Electronic Database University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Available from: https://amphibiaweb.org [Accessed 28th April 2023]. |
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
CITES. (2023a) Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna. Available from: https://cites.org/eng/app/appendices.php [Accessed 8th May 2023]. |
| [12] |
CITES. (2023b) Myanmar. Available from: https://cites.org/eng/parties/country-profiles/mm [Accessed 8th May 2023]. |
| [13] |
CITES. (2023c) Myanmar. Available from: https://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/app/2023/E-Appendices-2023-05-21.pdf [Accessed 2nd June 2023]. |
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
CPSG. (2024a) Conservation Planning Specialist Group. The One Plan Approach to Conservation | Conservation Planning Specialist Group (cpsg.org). Available from: https://www.cpsg.org/our-work/our-approach/one-plan-approach#:∼:text=The%20One%20Plan%20Approach%20to,two%20parallel%20but%20separate%20tracks [Accessed 11th August 2024]. |
| [16] |
CPSG. (2024b) Conservation Planning Specialist Group. Highlighted Story: Pickersgill’s Reed Frog | Conservation Planning Specialist Group (cbsg.org). Available from: https://www.cpsg.org/news/dive-our-2023-annual-report-connecting-conservationists-and-inspiring-species-updates [Accessed 10th August 2024]. |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
GBIF. (2023) The Global Biodiversity Information Facility. What is GBIF. Available from: https://www.gbif.org/what-is-gbif [Accessed 25 May 2023]. |
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
IUCN. (2023) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-2. Available from: https://www.iucnredlist.org [Accessed 21st June 2023]. |
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
* |
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
R Core Team. (2023) R 4.3.0: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ |
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
RStudio. (2023) RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Posit Software, PBC, Boston, MA. Available from: http://www.posit.co/ |
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. (2023) Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) and World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (WD-OECM) [Online], June 2023, Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. Available at: www.protectedplanet.net |
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
ZIMS. (2023) Species360 Zoological Information Management System (ZIMS). Available from: https://zims.species360.org [Accessed 9th May 2023]. |
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
* |
2024 The Author(s). Integrative Conservation published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (XTBG).
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |